Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DOOO vs HOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
DOOO vs HOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.79B | $4.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $230M |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 5.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 57.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.13B | $3.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $3.09B |
DOOO vs HOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRP Inc. (DOOO) | 100 | 185.5 | +85.5% |
| Harley-Davidson, In… (HOG) | 100 | 92.8 | -7.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DOOO vs HOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DOOO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 323.8% 10Y total return vs HOG's -28.0%
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 57.5x)
- +87.4% vs HOG's +6.0%
HOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth -13.8%, EPS growth -19.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 96.7%, current ratio 2.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -13.8% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 57.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs DOOO's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs DOOO's 1.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs DOOO's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.4% vs HOG's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs DOOO's -0.6%, ROIC 5.0% vs 12.8% |
DOOO vs HOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DOOO vs HOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DOOO and HOG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOOO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 1.8x HOG's $4.3B. HOG is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOOO's -0.5%. On growth, DOOO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $868M | $366M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $230M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $481M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +5.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -79.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DOOO and HOG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HOG's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DOOO's 6.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.06x | 8.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.45x | 57.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.33x | 5.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 26.77x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.37x | 6.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOG delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-8 for DOOO. HOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DOOO's 12.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOG scores 7/9 vs DOOO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 12.68x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | -$38M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.82x | 13.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DOOO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DOOO five years ago would be worth $7,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,425 for HOG. Over the past 12 months, DOOO leads with a +87.4% total return vs HOG's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOOO at -4.0% vs HOG's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.4% | +15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.4% | +6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | -27.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | -45.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.8% | -28.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOOO and HOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOG is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DOOO's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.89 | $31.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.22 | $17.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.4 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 198K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
HOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DOOO as "Buy" and HOG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for DOOO (target: $103) vs -12.0% for HOG (target: $21). For income investors, HOG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.02% vs DOOO's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.85 | $20.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +13.4% |
HOG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). DOOO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
DOOO vs HOG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DOOO or HOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(HOG) is the stronger pick with -13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (57. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRP Inc. (DOOO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DOOO or HOG?
On forward P/E, BRP Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DOOO or HOG?
Over the past 5 years, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) delivered a total return of -28. 1%, compared to -45. 8% for Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DOOO returned +323. 8% versus HOG's -28. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DOOO or HOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(HOG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus BRP Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning DOOO is approximately 22% more volatile than HOG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 13% for BRP Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DOOO or HOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(HOG) is pulling ahead at -13. 8% versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Harley-Davidson, Inc. grew EPS -19. 2% year-over-year, compared to -130. 4% for BRP Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOOO leads at 0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DOOO or HOG?
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(HOG) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -2. 7% for BRP Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOG leads at 8. 6% versus 7. 0% for DOOO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOG leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DOOO or HOG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Harley-Davidson, Inc. — 44. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOOO: 60. 1% to $102. 85.
08Which pays a better dividend — DOOO or HOG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 9% for BRP Inc. (DOOO).
09Is DOOO or HOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BRP Inc.
(DOOO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 0. 9% yield, +323. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOOO: +323. 8%, HOG: -28. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DOOO and HOG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DOOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.