Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DSY vs AIXI vs GFAI vs MSFT vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
DSY vs AIXI vs GFAI vs MSFT vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $123M | $8M | $10M | $3.13T | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $115M | $72M | $318.27B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-324K | $-53M | $-24M | $125.22B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 66.9% | 64.3% | 15.1% | 68.3% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -13.1% | -44.2% | -27.4% | 46.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 174.8x | — | — | 25.3x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $46M | $3M | $112.18B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $748K | $847K | $22M | $30.24B | $86.81B |
DSY vs AIXI vs GFAI vs MSFT vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Tree Cloud Hold… (DSY) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 8.3 | -91.7% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 17.9 | -82.1% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DSY vs AIXI vs GFAI vs MSFT vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DSY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIXI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2%
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
AMZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.24 vs MSFT's 1.35
- +43.7% vs DSY's -93.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs GFAI's 0.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs GFAI's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs DSY's -93.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs -34.4% |
DSY vs AIXI vs GFAI vs MSFT vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DSY vs AIXI vs GFAI vs MSFT vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • DSY leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 101421.6x DSY's $7M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $115M | $72M | $318.3B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25,648 | -$49M | -$12M | $192.6B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$323,757 | -$53M | -$24M | $125.2B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$2M | -$6M | $72.9B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.9% | +64.3% | +15.1% | +68.3% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.1% | -44.2% | -27.4% | +46.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -45.9% | -32.9% | +39.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.9% | -2.0% | -8.8% | +22.9% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -64.9% | +3.6% | +18.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.8% | -29.9% | +38.9% | +23.4% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 82% valuation discount to DSY's 174.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $123M | $8M | $10M | $3.13T | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $125M | $53M | -$9M | $3.21T | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 174.80x | -0.45x | -0.89x | 30.86x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 25.34x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.64x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 112.86x | — | — | 19.72x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.76x | 0.11x | 0.28x | 11.10x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 0.16x | 9.15x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 43.66x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs AIXI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | — | -69.7% | +33.1% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | -65.3% | -50.2% | +19.2% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -34.4% | -41.6% | +24.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -3.4% | -19.1% | +29.7% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.08x | 0.33x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $45M | -$19M | $81.9B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $748,099 | $846,593 | $22M | $30.2B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $46M | $3M | $112.2B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.35x | -14.13x | -167.24x | 55.65x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs DSY's -93.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.6% | +68.1% | -26.3% | -10.8% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.0% | -79.2% | -53.2% | -2.1% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -98.6% | -93.8% | +39.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -98.6% | -99.5% | +72.5% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -98.6% | -99.5% | +787.7% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.9% | -75.9% | -60.4% | +11.7% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSFT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs DSY's 1.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.94x | 2.31x | 0.89x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $146.60 | $4.02 | $1.50 | $555.45 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $0.08 | $0.38 | $356.28 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.5% | +18.0% | +31.5% | +75.8% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.1 | 49.3 | 47.0 | 54.0 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 60.6M | 378K | 32.5M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSFT as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $551.75 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 81 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 19 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
DSY vs AIXI vs GFAI vs MSFT vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) a "Buy" — based on 81 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited at 174. 8x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately 161% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus 0. 2% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -20. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -18. 5% for GFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 31. 1% to $551. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. DSY, AIXI, GFAI, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DSY or AIXI or GFAI or MSFT or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DSY and AIXI and GFAI and MSFT and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (DSY (Consumer Defensive) and AIXI (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and MSFT (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DSY is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while DSY, AIXI, GFAI, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.