Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DTW vs GEV vs NEE vs SO vs EXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
DTW vs GEV vs NEE vs SO vs EXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $3.90B | $281.02B | $194.60B | $104.20B | $45.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.63B | $39.38B | $27.93B | $30.17B | $24.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.46B | $9.38B | $8.18B | $4.36B | $2.78B |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 19.9% | 47.8% | 43.1% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 3.9% | 29.5% | 24.1% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | 37.6x | 23.1x | 20.2x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $26.52B | $0.00 | $95.62B | $65.82B | $50.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $8.85B | $2.81B | $1.64B | $1.15B |
DTW vs GEV vs NEE vs SO vs EXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DTE Energy Company … (DTW) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 128.8 | +28.8% |
| Exelon Corporation (EXC) | 100 | 118.2 | +18.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DTW vs GEV vs NEE vs SO vs EXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 19.4%
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 4.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.3%
- Beta 0.80, yield 19.4%, current ratio 0.80x
- 26.9% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3%
GEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs NEE's 266.0%
- +157.4% vs EXC's -0.7%
- 15.2% ROA vs EXC's 2.4%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.1%
NEE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.60x
- PEG 1.33 vs SO's 3.45
- 29.3% margin vs DTW's 9.4%
- Beta 0.21 vs GEV's 1.76
SO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, EXC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs DTW's 9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs GEV's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 19.4% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NEE's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +157.4% vs EXC's -0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs EXC's 2.4%, ROIC 27.9% vs 5.1% |
DTW vs GEV vs NEE vs SO vs EXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DTW vs GEV vs NEE vs SO vs EXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
NEE leads 1 • DTW leads 1 • SO leads 0 • EXC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 2.5x DTW's $15.6B. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DTW's 9.4%. On growth, DTW holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.6B | $39.4B | $27.9B | $30.2B | $24.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.1B | $2.2B | $15.5B | $13.3B | $8.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $9.4B | $8.2B | $4.4B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.0B | $3.6B | -$3.8B | -$3.8B | -$2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +19.9% | +47.8% | +43.1% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +3.9% | +29.5% | +24.1% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +23.8% | +29.3% | +14.5% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +9.2% | -13.6% | -12.7% | -8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.4% | +16.1% | +7.3% | +8.0% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.7% | +18.2% | +160.0% | -0.8% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DTW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.1x trailing earnings, DTW trades at a 95% valuation discount to GEV's 59.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEE offers better value at 1.64x vs SO's 4.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $281.0B | $194.6B | $104.2B | $45.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.2B | $272.2B | $287.4B | $168.4B | $94.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.08x | 59.12x | 28.36x | 23.58x | 16.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.81x | 37.62x | 23.07x | 20.21x | 15.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.64x | 4.03x | 2.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.05x | 121.45x | 18.73x | 12.66x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 7.38x | 7.08x | 3.53x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 23.47x | 2.93x | 2.64x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.73x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $10 for EXC. NEE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DTW's 2.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DTW scores 7/9 vs EXC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +79.7% | +12.7% | +11.3% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +15.2% | +3.9% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +27.9% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +6.6% | +4.7% | +5.4% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.16x | — | 1.44x | 1.69x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $26.3B | -$8.8B | $92.8B | $64.2B | $49.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $8.8B | $2.8B | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26.5B | $0 | $95.6B | $65.8B | $50.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.94x | — | 1.99x | 2.51x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,754 for DTW. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +157.4% total return vs EXC's -0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 99.9% vs DTW's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.9% | +54.0% | +16.1% | +6.9% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.1% | +157.4% | +42.0% | +3.6% | -0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.0% | +698.3% | +31.0% | +35.5% | +14.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.5% | +698.3% | +38.2% | +60.6% | +61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | +698.3% | +266.0% | +137.8% | +125.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | +99.9% | +9.4% | +10.7% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEE and SO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs EXC's 87.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.76x | 0.21x | -0.15x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.23 | $1181.95 | $98.75 | $100.84 | $50.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.89 | $387.03 | $63.88 | $83.09 | $41.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +88.5% | +94.5% | +91.7% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.3 | 66.5 | 54.3 | 43.5 | 33.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 2.4M | 8.7M | 4.5M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DTW and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", NEE as "Buy", SO as "Hold", EXC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for EXC (target: $49) vs 5.2% for NEE (target: $98). For income investors, DTW offers the higher dividend yield at 19.37% vs NEE's 2.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1119.95 | $98.13 | $99.62 | $49.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 36 | 33 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +19.4% | +0.1% | +2.4% | +2.9% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.21 | $1.00 | $2.24 | $2.72 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NEE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
DTW vs GEV vs NEE vs SO vs EXC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E (DTW) is the stronger pick with 26.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E (DTW) offers the better valuation at 3. 1x trailing P/E (2. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC?
On trailing P/E, DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E (DTW) is the cheapest at 3.
1x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 59. 1x. On forward P/E, DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E is actually cheaper at 2. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NextEra Energy, Inc. wins at 1. 33x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to +7. 5% for DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E (DTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +698. 3% versus DTW's +30. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately -1258% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 144% versus 2% for DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E (DTW) is pulling ahead at 26.
9% versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEE leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus 9. 2% for DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DTW leads at 84. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 33x versus The Southern Company's 3. 45x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, DTE Energy Company JR SUB DB 2017 E (DTW) trades at 2. 8x forward P/E versus 37. 6x for GE Vernova Inc. — 34. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXC: 10. 7% to $49. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC?
In this comparison, DTW (19.
4% yield), EXC (3. 6% yield), SO (2. 9% yield), NEE (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DTW or GEV or NEE or SO or EXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 9% yield, +137. 8% 10Y return). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +137. 8%, GEV: +698. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DTW and GEV and NEE and SO and EXC?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DTW is a small-cap high-growth stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DTW, NEE, SO, EXC pay a dividend while GEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.