REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DX vs ARR vs AGNC vs NLY vs TWO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
DX vs ARR vs AGNC vs NLY vs TWO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $2.66B | $2.18B | $9.62B | $16.08B | $1.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $421M | $993M | $3.46B | $6.70B | $765M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $319M | $241M | $838M | $2.03B | $-343M |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | 95.8% | 100.0% | 99.2% | 88.0% |
| Operating Margin | 107.8% | 84.7% | 107.1% | 102.6% | 57.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 5.7x | 6.9x | 7.5x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $13.91B | $17.94B | $64M | $111.86B | $8.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $930M | $63M | $505M | $2.04B | $842M |
DX vs ARR vs AGNC vs NLY vs TWO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| ARMOUR Residential … (ARR) | 100 | 44.8 | -55.2% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Two Harbors Investm… (TWO) | 100 | 68.5 | -31.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DX vs ARR vs AGNC vs NLY vs TWO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 59.1% 10Y total return vs AGNC's 46.9%
- 75.8% margin vs TWO's -44.8%
- 1.8% ROA vs TWO's -3.0%, ROIC 4.8% vs 3.1%
ARR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 17.1%
- 444.1% FFO/revenue growth vs TWO's -28.4%
- Lower P/E (5.7x vs 7.5x)
- 17.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AGNC's 14.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
AGNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- +39.4% vs TWO's +18.8%
Among these 5 stocks, NLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TWO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.49, yield 13.2%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.49 vs AGNC's 0.74
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 444.1% FFO/revenue growth vs TWO's -28.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.7x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 75.8% margin vs TWO's -44.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs AGNC's 0.74 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AGNC's 14.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs TWO's +18.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs TWO's -3.0%, ROIC 4.8% vs 3.1% |
DX vs ARR vs AGNC vs NLY vs TWO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DX vs ARR vs AGNC vs NLY vs TWO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DX leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGNC leads 1 • ARR leads 1 • NLY leads 0 • TWO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 15.9x DX's $421M. DX is the more profitable business, keeping 75.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWO's -44.8%. On growth, DX holds the edge at +3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $421M | $993M | $3.5B | $6.7B | $765M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $572M | $758M | $3.7B | $6.9B | $70M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $319M | $241M | $838M | $2.0B | -$343M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $107M | $134M | $604M | -$222M | -$66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.9% | +95.8% | +100.0% | +99.2% | +88.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +107.8% | +84.7% | +107.1% | +102.6% | +57.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +75.8% | +24.2% | +24.2% | +30.3% | -44.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +13.5% | +17.5% | -3.3% | -8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | -84.8% | +2.5% | -8.4% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.3% | -2.5% | +84.6% | +79.5% | +120.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARR and TWO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, ARR trades at a 54% valuation discount to AGNC's 11.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWO's 198.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $2.2B | $9.6B | $16.1B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.6B | $20.1B | $9.2B | $125.9B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.39x | 5.32x | 11.53x | 7.67x | -2.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.53x | 5.71x | 6.87x | 7.46x | 11.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.19x | 20.79x | 2.42x | 18.32x | 198.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.32x | 1.67x | 1.97x | 2.40x | 2.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 0.73x | 0.86x | 0.89x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.52x | 111.86x | — | 14.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGNC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NLY delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TWO. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARR's 7.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARR scores 7/9 vs TWO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +11.5% | +7.3% | +14.1% | -19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.7% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +6.8% | +34.0% | +6.4% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +31.5% | +4.9% | +19.7% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.65x | 7.94x | 0.01x | 6.92x | 4.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.0B | $17.9B | -$441M | $109.8B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $930M | $63M | $505M | $2.0B | $842M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.9B | $17.9B | $64M | $111.9B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.50x | 1.32x | 1.42x | 0.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DX five years ago would be worth $10,815 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,379 for ARR. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +39.4% total return vs TWO's +18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DX at 19.1% vs ARR's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +2.3% | +2.5% | +0.8% | +23.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.5% | +24.0% | +39.4% | +31.7% | +18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.0% | +6.5% | +58.3% | +60.1% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.2% | -36.2% | -2.2% | +1.4% | -20.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.1% | -11.6% | +46.9% | +35.5% | -6.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +2.1% | +16.5% | +17.0% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NLY and TWO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TWO is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGNC's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NLY currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs TWO's 87.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.65x | 0.74x | 0.64x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.93 | $19.31 | $12.19 | $24.52 | $14.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.70 | $13.98 | $8.65 | $18.43 | $8.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +90.9% | +87.9% | +91.3% | +87.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 51.1 | 52.1 | 52.7 | 70.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 3.1M | 18.2M | 7.0M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ARR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DX as "Hold", ARR as "Hold", AGNC as "Hold", NLY as "Buy", TWO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.4% upside for DX (target: $17) vs 3.8% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, ARR offers the higher dividend yield at 17.14% vs NLY's 13.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.83 | $18.25 | $11.13 | $24.50 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 25 | 35 | 28 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +17.1% | +14.7% | +13.1% | +13.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.01 | $1.58 | $2.94 | $1.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.1% |
DX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AGNC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DX vs ARR vs AGNC vs NLY vs TWO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
(ARR) is the stronger pick with 444. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 4% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO?
On trailing P/E, ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
(ARR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus AGNC Investment Corp. at 11. 5x. On forward P/E, ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO?
Over the past 5 years, Dynex Capital, Inc.
(DX) delivered a total return of +8. 2%, compared to -36. 2% for ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DX returned +59. 1% versus ARR's -11. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Two Harbors Investment Corp.
(TWO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus AGNC Investment Corp. 's 0. 74β — meaning AGNC is approximately 51% more volatile than TWO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
(ARR) is pulling ahead at 444. 1% versus -28. 4% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -284. 0% for Two Harbors Investment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWO leads at 263. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO?
Dynex Capital, Inc.
(DX) is the more profitable company, earning 75. 9% net margin versus -75. 0% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 75. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DX leads at 175. 6% versus 68. 7% for TWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
(ARR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Two Harbors Investment Corp. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DX: 26. 4% to $16. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO?
In this comparison, ARR (17.
1% yield), AGNC (14. 7% yield), TWO (13. 2% yield), NLY (13. 1% yield) pay a dividend. DX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DX or ARR or AGNC or NLY or TWO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Two Harbors Investment Corp.
(TWO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 13. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWO: -6. 6%, DX: +59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DX and ARR and AGNC and NLY and TWO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TWO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ARR, AGNC, NLY, TWO pay a dividend while DX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.