Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EBMT vs MSBI vs CZWI vs HAFC vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
EBMT vs MSBI vs CZWI vs HAFC vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $182M | $608M | $203M | $908M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126M | $468M | $90M | $445M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $-124M | $14M | $76M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 70.9% | 57.4% | 54.7% | 57.5% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | -22.1% | 7.0% | 24.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 9.1x | 11.8x | 9.6x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $82M | $432M | $52M | $280M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $128M | $119M | $213M | $185M |
EBMT vs MSBI vs CZWI vs HAFC vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Bancorp Monta… (EBMT) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
| Midland States Banc… (MSBI) | 100 | 189.3 | +89.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EBMT vs MSBI vs CZWI vs HAFC vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EBMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 53.2%
MSBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 4.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EBMT's 2.6%
- +66.4% vs NBTB's +9.0%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs MSBI's 1.05, lower leverage
HAFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.76 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.53
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MSBI's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MSBI's 0.8%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MSBI's -14.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MSBI's -14.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MSBI's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs MSBI's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EBMT's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.4% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MSBI's 0.8% |
EBMT vs MSBI vs CZWI vs HAFC vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EBMT vs MSBI vs CZWI vs HAFC vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • EBMT leads 0 • MSBI leads 0 • HAFC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSBI's -26.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126M | $468M | $90M | $445M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | -$106M | $9M | $110M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | -$124M | $14M | $76M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $122M | $11M | $204M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.9% | +57.4% | +54.7% | +57.5% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | -22.1% | +7.0% | +24.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -26.6% | +16.0% | +17.1% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +25.7% | +11.5% | +45.8% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | -60.0% | +63.0% | +20.7% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MSBI and HAFC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, EBMT trades at a 17% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAFC offers better value at 0.95x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $182M | $608M | $203M | $908M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $240M | $913M | $136M | $976M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.03x | -4.62x | 14.44x | 12.10x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.22x | 9.08x | 11.78x | 9.61x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.85x | 0.95x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.32x | — | 15.28x | 8.59x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 1.30x | 2.25x | 2.04x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.10x | 1.09x | 1.15x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.42x | 5.06x | 19.55x | 4.46x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAFC delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-22 for MSBI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSBI's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EBMT scores 9/9 vs MSBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | -21.7% | +7.8% | +9.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | -1.8% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | -7.3% | +2.0% | +7.4% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | -2.7% | +0.6% | +2.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.76x | 0.28x | 0.35x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $304M | -$67M | $68M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $128M | $119M | $213M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82M | $432M | $52M | $280M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.53x | -0.76x | 0.16x | 0.62x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,133 for EBMT. Over the past 12 months, MSBI leads with a +66.4% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | +35.1% | +21.5% | +15.2% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +66.4% | +45.6% | +36.9% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.8% | +67.7% | +160.0% | +137.2% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +19.6% | +71.2% | +64.7% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.0% | +76.8% | +157.0% | +76.5% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +18.8% | +37.5% | +33.4% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSBI and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSBI's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSBI currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.05x | 0.46x | 0.92x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.95 | $28.46 | $22.62 | $31.27 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.10 | $14.24 | $12.83 | $21.84 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +99.6% | +93.2% | +97.2% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 76.4 | 63.7 | 64.1 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 139K | 40K | 265K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EBMT and MSBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EBMT as "Hold", MSBI as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for HAFC (target: $35) vs -6.5% for MSBI (target: $27). For income investors, MSBI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.47% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $26.50 | — | $35.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +4.5% | +1.8% | +3.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.59 | $1.27 | $0.37 | $1.09 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +1.6% | +3.1% | +1.0% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
EBMT vs MSBI vs CZWI vs HAFC vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 4% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI). Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.
(EBMT) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Midland States Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hanmi Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +11. 3% for Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus HAFC's +76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Midland States Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning MSBI is approximately 128% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 76% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -14. 4% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. grew EPS 53. 2% year-over-year, compared to -565. 2% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -26. 6% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -22. 1% for MSBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAFC: 15. 2% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is EBMT or MSBI or CZWI or HAFC or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MSBI: +76. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EBMT and MSBI and CZWI and HAFC and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EBMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSBI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.