Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EFOI vs LYTS vs OESX vs HUBB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
EFOI vs LYTS vs OESX vs HUBB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $22M | $760M | $33M | $26.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $592M | $81M | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-965K | $26M | $-5M | $906M |
| Gross Margin | 19.5% | 25.3% | 29.9% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -24.7% | 6.5% | -4.3% | 20.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.3x | — | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $393K | $67M | $10M | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $565K | $3M | $6M | $483M |
EFOI vs LYTS vs OESX vs HUBB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Focus, Inc. (EFOI) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 397.7 | +297.7% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFOI vs LYTS vs OESX vs HUBB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFOI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 13.5%, current ratio 2.11x
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 2.11x
- Beta 0.49 vs LYTS's 1.43, lower leverage
- +131.3% vs OESX's +31.2%
LYTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs EFOI's -15.0%
- Better valuation composite
OESX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HUBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- 410.7% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 108.5%
- PEG 1.20 vs LYTS's 1.31
- 15.1% margin vs EFOI's -25.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs EFOI's -15.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs EFOI's -25.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs LYTS's 1.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs LYTS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.3% vs OESX's +31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs EFOI's -18.6%, ROIC 17.1% vs -45.2% |
EFOI vs LYTS vs OESX vs HUBB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EFOI vs LYTS vs OESX vs HUBB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUBB leads in 3 of 6 categories
LYTS leads 2 • EFOI leads 0 • OESX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 1552.2x EFOI's $4M. HUBB is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFOI's -25.0%. On growth, HUBB holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $592M | $81M | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$918,000 | $51M | -$1M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$965,000 | $26M | -$5M | $906M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$850,000 | $38M | $348M | $909M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +25.3% | +29.9% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.7% | +6.5% | -4.3% | +20.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | +4.3% | -5.6% | +15.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.0% | +6.4% | +4.3% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.9% | -0.5% | +7.7% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | +11.1% | +109.6% | +8.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LYTS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 4% valuation discount to LYTS's 30.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HUBB offers better value at 1.43x vs LYTS's 1.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $760M | $33M | $26.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | $823M | $37M | $28.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.00x | 30.91x | -2.57x | 29.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.34x | — | 25.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.82x | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.03x | — | 20.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.53x | 1.33x | 0.41x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.52x | 3.26x | 2.56x | 6.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.94x | 66.51x | 29.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-31 for EFOI. EFOI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OESX's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs OESX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.7% | +10.9% | -0.0% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | +6.5% | -0.0% | +11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.2% | +9.5% | -34.8% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.5% | +12.6% | -34.9% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.29x | 0.87x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$172,000 | $63M | $4M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $565,000 | $3M | $6M | $483M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $393,000 | $67M | $10M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -368.40x | 13.52x | -3.29x | 16.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYTS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,250 for EFOI. Over the past 12 months, EFOI leads with a +131.3% total return vs OESX's +31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYTS at 26.0% vs OESX's -15.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +73.0% | +32.8% | -38.0% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +131.3% | +58.0% | +31.2% | +41.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.7% | +100.0% | -38.7% | +87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | +223.4% | -83.6% | +159.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +108.5% | -32.5% | +410.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | +26.0% | -15.1% | +23.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EFOI and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EFOI is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LYTS's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs EFOI's 39.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.43x | 1.10x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.84 | $24.75 | $18.64 | $565.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $15.31 | $5.50 | $349.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.0% | +98.7% | +49.6% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 70.1 | 41.8 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 378K | 39K | 546K |
Analyst Outlook
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYTS as "Buy", HUBB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs 8.5% for HUBB (target: $535). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | — | $535.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 | — | $5.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.9% |
HUBB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LYTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
EFOI vs LYTS vs OESX vs HUBB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Energy Focus, Inc. (EFOI). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus LSI Industries Inc. at 30. 9x. On forward P/E, LSI Industries Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hubbell Incorporated wins at 1. 20x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 31x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +223. 4%, compared to -87. 5% for Energy Focus, Inc. (EFOI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBB returned +410. 7% versus EFOI's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Energy Focus, Inc.
(EFOI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning LYTS is approximately 194% more volatile than EFOI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Focus, Inc. (EFOI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 87% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -15. 0% for Energy Focus, Inc. (EFOI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Energy Focus, Inc. grew EPS 75. 8% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for LSI Industries Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB?
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
2% net margin versus -32. 6% for Energy Focus, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus -37. 9% for EFOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBB leads at 35. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 20x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 31x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) trades at 22. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Hubbell Incorporated — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 10. 6% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB?
In this comparison, HUBB (1.
1% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. EFOI, OESX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EFOI or LYTS or OESX or HUBB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +410. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 7%, OESX: -32. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFOI and LYTS and OESX and HUBB?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFOI (Consumer Cyclical) and LYTS (Technology) and OESX (Industrials) and HUBB (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EFOI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LYTS, HUBB pay a dividend while EFOI, OESX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.