EFX vs MCO vs SPGI vs VRSK

For growth investors, Moody's Corporation (MCO) is the stronger pick with 8.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equifax Inc. (EFX) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus Moody's Corporation at 33. 4x. On forward P/E, Equifax Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: S&P Global Inc. wins at 2. 51x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x.

Over the past 5 years, Moody's Corporation (MCO) delivered a total return of +41.

4%, compared to -23. 2% for Equifax Inc. (EFX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCO returned +409. 5% versus EFX's +58. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Equifax Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning EFX is approximately -2525% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Moody's Corporation (MCO) is pulling ahead at 8.

9% versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Moody's Corporation grew EPS 21. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRSK leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Moody's Corporation (MCO) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus 10. 9% for Equifax Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCO leads at 44. 8% versus 18. 0% for EFX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPGI leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 51x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Equifax Inc. (EFX) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Moody's Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRSK: 32. 4% to $231. 25.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Equifax Inc. (EFX) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Moody's Corporation (MCO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, EFX: +58. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (EFX (Industrials) and MCO (Financial Services) and SPGI (Financial Services) and VRSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.