Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EFX vs SPGI vs MCO vs VRSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Consulting Services
EFX vs SPGI vs MCO vs VRSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $21.19B | $126.89B | $81.04B | $22.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.28B | $15.34B | $7.72B | $3.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $699M | $4.78B | $2.50B | $910M |
| Gross Margin | 44.7% | 70.2% | 68.2% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 42.2% | 44.8% | 44.9% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 21.8x | 27.4x | 22.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.09B | $14.20B | $7.35B | $5.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $1.75B | $2.38B | $2.18B |
EFX vs SPGI vs MCO vs VRSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equifax Inc. (EFX) | 100 | 114.4 | +14.4% |
| S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
| Moody's Corporation (MCO) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Verisk Analytics, I… (VRSK) | 100 | 101.2 | +1.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFX vs SPGI vs MCO vs VRSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 22.9x)
- 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MCO's 0.9%
SPGI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 39.3%, current ratio 0.82x
- PEG 2.51 vs EFX's 4.39
- Beta 0.58, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.82x
MCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.4%
- 409.5% 10Y total return vs SPGI's 337.1%
- 8.9% NII/revenue growth vs VRSK's 6.6%
- 31.9% margin vs EFX's 11.1%
VRSK is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 16.7% ROA vs EFX's 5.9%, ROIC 33.0% vs 8.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% NII/revenue growth vs VRSK's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 22.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs EFX's 11.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs EFX's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MCO's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.5% vs VRSK's -43.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.7% ROA vs EFX's 5.9%, ROIC 33.0% vs 8.5% |
EFX vs SPGI vs MCO vs VRSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EFX vs SPGI vs MCO vs VRSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EFX leads in 1 of 6 categories
VRSK leads 1 • MCO leads 1 • SPGI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EFX and VRSK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPGI is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.3B annually — 4.9x VRSK's $3.1B. MCO is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFX's 11.1%. On growth, EFX holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $15.3B | $7.7B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $7.8B | $4.0B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $699M | $4.8B | $2.5B | $910M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $5.6B | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.7% | +70.2% | +68.2% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +42.2% | +44.8% | +44.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +29.2% | +31.9% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +35.6% | +33.4% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | — | — | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.0% | +32.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EFX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, VRSK trades at a 20% valuation discount to MCO's 33.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VRSK offers better value at 3.16x vs EFX's 7.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.2B | $126.9B | $81.0B | $22.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.1B | $139.3B | $86.0B | $25.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.01x | 29.24x | 33.44x | 26.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.38x | 21.84x | 27.37x | 22.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.11x | 3.36x | 4.29x | 3.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.38x | 18.20x | 21.86x | 15.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.49x | 8.27x | 10.50x | 7.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.60x | 3.62x | 19.56x | 78.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.68x | 23.26x | 31.47x | 19.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $13 for SPGI. SPGI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRSK's 16.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCO scores 9/9 vs VRSK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +12.9% | +64.1% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +7.9% | +16.2% | +16.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +9.7% | +22.5% | +33.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +12.1% | +27.9% | +39.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 0.39x | 1.75x | 16.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.9B | $12.5B | $5.0B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $1.7B | $2.4B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $14.2B | $7.4B | $5.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.38x | 22.69x | 17.22x | 7.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCO five years ago would be worth $14,141 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,677 for EFX. Over the past 12 months, MCO leads with a -1.5% total return vs VRSK's -43.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCO at 15.2% vs VRSK's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.7% | -16.2% | -8.2% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.2% | -14.5% | -1.5% | -43.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.9% | +23.8% | +52.8% | -14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.2% | +14.2% | +41.4% | +1.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.3% | +337.1% | +409.5% | +137.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +7.4% | +15.2% | -5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCO and VRSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRSK is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EFX's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCO currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs VRSK's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.58x | 0.86x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $281.03 | $579.05 | $546.88 | $322.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $166.02 | $381.61 | $402.28 | $161.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.5% | +74.0% | +83.6% | +54.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 42.4 | 48.0 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.8M | 1.1M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EFX and MCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EFX as "Buy", SPGI as "Buy", MCO as "Buy", VRSK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.4% upside for VRSK (target: $231) vs 19.2% for MCO (target: $545). For income investors, EFX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs MCO's 0.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $227.60 | $548.11 | $544.75 | $231.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 28 | 32 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 22 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.88 | $3.83 | $3.90 | $1.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +3.9% | +2.1% | +2.7% |
EFX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). VRSK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
EFX vs SPGI vs MCO vs VRSK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Moody's Corporation (MCO) is the stronger pick with 8.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (22. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equifax Inc. (EFX) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK?
On trailing P/E, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus Moody's Corporation at 33. 4x. On forward P/E, Equifax Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: S&P Global Inc. wins at 2. 51x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK?
Over the past 5 years, Moody's Corporation (MCO) delivered a total return of +41.
4%, compared to -23. 2% for Equifax Inc. (EFX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCO returned +409. 5% versus EFX's +58. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Equifax Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning EFX is approximately -2525% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Moody's Corporation (MCO) is pulling ahead at 8.
9% versus 6. 6% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Moody's Corporation grew EPS 21. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VRSK leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK?
Moody's Corporation (MCO) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus 10. 9% for Equifax Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCO leads at 44. 8% versus 18. 0% for EFX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPGI leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 51x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Equifax Inc. (EFX) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Moody's Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRSK: 32. 4% to $231. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Equifax Inc. (EFX) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Moody's Corporation (MCO).
09Is EFX or SPGI or MCO or VRSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, EFX: +58. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFX and SPGI and MCO and VRSK?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFX (Industrials) and SPGI (Financial Services) and MCO (Financial Services) and VRSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.