Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EGAN vs SPSC vs LPSN vs FORR vs KORE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Consulting Services
Telecommunications Services
EGAN vs SPSC vs LPSN vs FORR vs KORE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Consulting Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $212M | $2.14B | $32M | $125M | $156M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $91M | $762M | $244M | $397M | $285M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $91M | $-67M | $-119M | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | 72.4% | 68.0% | 62.2% | 64.6% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 15.3% | -9.6% | -20.9% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 21.7x | 12.7x | — | 8.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $10M | $392M | $72M | $307M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $151M | $95M | $63M | $19M |
EGAN vs SPSC vs LPSN vs FORR vs KORE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| eGain Corporation (EGAN) | 100 | 65.5 | -34.5% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 52.6 | -47.4% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Forrester Research,… (FORR) | 100 | 15.6 | -84.4% |
| KORE Group Holdings… (KORE) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGAN vs SPSC vs LPSN vs FORR vs KORE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGAN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 126.7% 10Y total return vs KORE's -9.8%
- PEG 0.58 vs SPSC's 0.89
- 39.8% margin vs FORR's -30.1%
- 24.6% ROA vs FORR's -28.2%, ROIC 48.3% vs 0.8%
SPSC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 20.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
- 17.8% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FORR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.68
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.68 vs LPSN's 2.05
KORE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +266.4% vs LPSN's -77.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.8% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.8% margin vs FORR's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.4% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.6% ROA vs FORR's -28.2%, ROIC 48.3% vs 0.8% |
EGAN vs SPSC vs LPSN vs FORR vs KORE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EGAN vs SPSC vs LPSN vs FORR vs KORE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KORE leads in 2 of 6 categories
FORR leads 1 • EGAN leads 0 • SPSC leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EGAN and SPSC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPSC is the larger business by revenue, generating $762M annually — 8.4x EGAN's $91M. EGAN is the more profitable business, keeping 39.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FORR's -30.1%. On growth, SPSC holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $91M | $762M | $244M | $397M | $285M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $162M | -$562,000 | -$66M | $44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $91M | -$67M | -$119M | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $167M | -$43M | $18M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.4% | +68.0% | +62.2% | +64.6% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +15.3% | -9.6% | -20.9% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | +11.9% | -27.6% | -30.1% | -24.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +21.9% | -17.4% | +4.6% | +1.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +5.8% | -19.0% | -6.5% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -8.6% | +79.4% | -79.1% | +36.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FORR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.8x trailing earnings, EGAN trades at a 71% valuation discount to SPSC's 23.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EGAN offers better value at 0.18x vs SPSC's 1.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $212M | $2.1B | $32M | $125M | $156M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $152M | $2.0B | $329M | $134M | $444M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.84x | 23.24x | -0.22x | -1.04x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.67x | 12.73x | — | 8.54x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.18x | 1.62x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.93x | 11.30x | — | 8.00x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 2.84x | 0.13x | 0.32x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.74x | 2.23x | — | 0.98x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.05x | 14.04x | — | 6.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — EGAN and SPSC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EGAN delivers a 40.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-81 for FORR. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FORR's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPSC scores 6/9 vs KORE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.6% | +9.5% | — | -80.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.6% | +7.9% | -12.4% | -28.2% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +48.3% | +12.2% | -6.6% | +0.8% | -30.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +12.5% | -5.8% | +0.8% | -22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.01x | — | 0.57x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$141M | $297M | $9M | $288M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $151M | $95M | $63M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $10M | $392M | $72M | $307M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.20x | -30.30x | -1.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KORE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KORE five years ago would be worth $9,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, KORE leads with a +266.4% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KORE at 16.5% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | -35.0% | -31.1% | -19.9% | +105.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.8% | -59.7% | -77.1% | -35.7% | +266.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | -62.6% | -95.8% | -74.5% | +57.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -41.9% | -99.7% | -85.9% | -7.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.7% | +119.8% | -97.0% | -75.9% | -9.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.6% | -28.0% | -65.4% | -36.6% | +16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
KORE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KORE is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 1.03x | 2.05x | 0.68x | -0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.95 | $153.16 | $21.60 | $11.57 | $9.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.87 | $50.56 | $2.37 | $4.88 | $2.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +37.3% | +12.4% | +56.4% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 46.9 | 40.3 | 51.6 | 74.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 170K | 605K | 148K | 109K | 137K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EGAN as "Buy", SPSC as "Hold", FORR as "Hold", KORE as "Buy".
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.71 | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 23 | — | 4 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 6 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.5% | +5.3% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +0.3% |
KORE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). FORR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EGAN vs SPSC vs LPSN vs FORR vs KORE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). eGain Corporation (EGAN) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate eGain Corporation (EGAN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE?
On trailing P/E, eGain Corporation (EGAN) is the cheapest at 6.
8x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. at 23. 2x. On forward P/E, Forrester Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: eGain Corporation wins at 0. 58x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE?
Over the past 5 years, KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) delivered a total return of -7. 4%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGAN returned +126. 7% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately -2388% more volatile than KORE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 57% for Forrester Research, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: eGain Corporation grew EPS 352. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1993. 3% for Forrester Research, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPSC leads at 18. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE?
eGain Corporation (EGAN) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
5% net margin versus -51. 1% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPSC leads at 15. 7% versus -35. 9% for KORE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EGAN leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, eGain Corporation (EGAN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for eGain Corporation — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is EGAN or SPSC or LPSN or FORR or KORE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 09)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KORE: -9. 8%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGAN and SPSC and LPSN and FORR and KORE?
These companies operate in different sectors (EGAN (Technology) and SPSC (Technology) and LPSN (Technology) and FORR (Industrials) and KORE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EGAN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FORR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.