Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EGBN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs WSFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
EGBN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs WSFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $799M | $588M | $2.35B | $3.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $634M | $251M | $867M | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-128M | $39M | $169M | $287M |
| Gross Margin | 3.2% | 49.1% | 72.1% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | -26.9% | 16.1% | 25.3% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.7x | 10.4x | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $760M | $327M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $168M | $185M | $1.33B |
EGBN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs WSFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGBN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs WSFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +46.7% vs NBTB's +9.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
NFBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 10.8x)
- 3.7% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 129.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 0.08x
- PEG 0.67 vs NBTB's 1.53
- NIM 3.4% vs NFBK's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs EGBN's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
EGBN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs WSFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EGBN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs WSFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSFS leads in 3 of 6 categories
EGBN leads 1 • NFBK leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 5.4x NFBK's $251M. WSFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGBN's -20.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $634M | $251M | $867M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$168M | $61M | $241M | $408M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$128M | $39M | $169M | $287M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $42M | $225M | $214M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +49.1% | +72.1% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +16.1% | +25.3% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | +11.9% | +19.5% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +11.9% | +25.2% | +15.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +68.8% | +39.5% | +22.9% |
Valuation Metrics
EGBN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 31% valuation discount to NFBK's 19.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSFS offers better value at 0.81x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $799M | $588M | $2.4B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $935M | $1.2B | $2.5B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.23x | 19.54x | 13.53x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.73x | 10.42x | 10.80x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.92x | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.19x | 10.35x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 2.34x | 2.71x | 2.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 0.83x | 1.21x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.50x | 19.64x | 10.75x | 17.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-11 for EGBN. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFBK scores 7/9 vs EGBN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +5.5% | +9.5% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.2% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +2.5% | +2.4% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.08x | 0.17x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $135M | $592M | $142M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $168M | $185M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $760M | $327M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.51x | 0.46x | 1.05x | 1.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSFS five years ago would be worth $14,315 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,901 for EGBN. Over the past 12 months, EGBN leads with a +46.7% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs EGBN's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.8% | +26.5% | +9.3% | +31.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +31.5% | +9.0% | +37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.1% | +65.7% | +54.1% | +135.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | +0.2% | +29.9% | +43.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.7% | +20.6% | +102.2% | +129.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.7% | +18.3% | +15.5% | +33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFBK and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WSFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EGBN's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs EGBN's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.00x | 0.89x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.26 | $14.21 | $46.92 | $73.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.03 | $9.90 | $39.20 | $49.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +99.0% | +96.1% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 57.0 | 57.3 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 281K | 258K | 236K | 385K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EGBN as "Hold", NFBK as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for EGBN (target: $29) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.67 | $14.50 | $46.00 | $74.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 9 | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +3.7% | +3.2% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | $0.52 | $1.43 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% | +0.4% | +7.6% |
WSFS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EGBN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EGBN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs WSFS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 67x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS?
Over the past 5 years, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) delivered a total return of +43.
1%, compared to -41. 0% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSFS returned +129. 0% versus EGBN's -31. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Eagle Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EGBN is approximately 37% more volatile than WSFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WSFS Financial Corporation grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -169. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS?
WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
1% net margin versus -20. 2% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus -26. 9% for EGBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGBN: 9. 4% to $28. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is EGBN or NFBK or NBTB or WSFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 9% yield, +129. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSFS: +129. 0%, EGBN: -31. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGBN and NFBK and NBTB and WSFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EGBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.