Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EGHT vs NICE vs FIVN vs LPSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
EGHT vs NICE vs FIVN vs LPSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $372M | $5.78B | $1.70B | $32M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $728M | $2.95B | $1.17B | $244M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $612M | $57M | $-67M |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 66.4% | 55.1% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 21.9% | 4.7% | -9.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 8.7x | 7.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $410M | $164M | $847M | $392M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $379M | $232M | $95M |
EGHT vs NICE vs FIVN vs LPSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8x8, Inc. (EGHT) | 100 | 18.4 | -81.6% |
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGHT vs NICE vs FIVN vs LPSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGHT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +51.7% vs LPSN's -77.1%
NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
- 20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
FIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- 125.4% 10Y total return vs NICE's 50.7%
- 10.3% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
- Better valuation composite
LPSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.7% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 13.2% vs -6.6% |
EGHT vs NICE vs FIVN vs LPSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EGHT vs NICE vs FIVN vs LPSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
EGHT leads 1 • FIVN leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 12.1x LPSN's $244M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, FIVN holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $728M | $2.9B | $1.2B | $244M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $845M | $140M | -$562,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $612M | $57M | -$67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | $665M | $206M | -$43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.7% | +66.4% | +55.1% | +62.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +21.9% | +4.7% | -9.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +20.8% | +4.9% | -27.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +22.6% | +17.6% | -17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.0% | +9.0% | +9.2% | -19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.6% | +56.5% | +20.0% | +79.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EGHT and NICE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIVN's 48.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIVN's 16.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $372M | $5.8B | $1.7B | $32M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $694M | $5.6B | $2.3B | $329M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.71x | 9.89x | 48.26x | -0.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.27x | 8.74x | 6.96x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.76x | 6.59x | 16.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 1.96x | 1.48x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.84x | 1.56x | 2.46x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.43x | 8.22x | 8.45x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EGHT. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGHT's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs LPSN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +16.4% | +7.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +11.8% | +3.2% | -12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +13.2% | +1.7% | -6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +16.1% | +2.2% | -5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.36x | 0.04x | 1.08x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $322M | -$216M | $615M | $297M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $379M | $232M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $410M | $164M | $847M | $392M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | — | 7.94x | 0.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EGHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NICE five years ago would be worth $4,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, EGHT leads with a +51.7% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EGHT at -2.8% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.3% | -14.6% | +18.0% | -31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.7% | -40.4% | -11.9% | -77.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.2% | -49.3% | -61.4% | -95.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | -59.1% | -87.0% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | +50.7% | +125.4% | -97.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.8% | -20.2% | -27.2% | -65.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EGHT and NICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGHT currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 0.72x | 1.79x | 2.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.88 | $180.61 | $30.38 | $21.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $94.89 | $13.29 | $2.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +53.0% | +73.1% | +12.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 40.9 | 68.1 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 631K | 2.8M | 148K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EGHT as "Hold", NICE as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 640.4% upside for EGHT (target: $20) vs 27.9% for FIVN (target: $28).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.77 | $150.88 | $28.40 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 23 | 41 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EGHT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
EGHT vs NICE vs FIVN vs LPSN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NICE Ltd. (NICE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN?
On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Five9, Inc. at 48. 3x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN?
Over the past 5 years, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) delivered a total return of -59. 1%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVN returned +125. 4% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 183% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for 8x8, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to 43. 0% for NICE Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN?
NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EGHT leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 7x for NICE Ltd. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGHT: 640. 4% to $19. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is EGHT or NICE or FIVN or LPSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGHT and NICE and FIVN and LPSN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EGHT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.