Business Equipment & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EHGO vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
EHGO vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Business Equipment & Supplies | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $4M | $6M | $19.77B | $25M | $3.08T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30M | $115M | $127M | $299M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-53M | $-289M | $-4M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 64.3% | 25.8% | 22.8% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -58.6% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -1.4% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $46M | $24M | $34M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $847K | $87M | $28M | $30.24B |
EHGO vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eshallgo Inc. Class… (EHGO) | 100 | 6.7 | -93.3% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 11.5 | -88.5% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 276.8 | +176.8% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 107.2 | +7.2% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 99.2 | -0.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EHGO vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EHGO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 2.92x
AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs EHGO's -20.6%
BBAI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +28.6% vs EHGO's -91.5%
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 14.7%
- Beta 0.19, yield 14.7%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.19 vs BBAI's 3.31
- 14.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.8% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.5%
- 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- 19.2% ROA vs EHGO's -80.1%, ROIC 24.9% vs -62.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs EHGO's -20.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 14.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.6% vs EHGO's -91.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs EHGO's -80.1%, ROIC 24.9% vs -62.4% |
EHGO vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EHGO vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
BBAI leads 1 • EHGO leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 10629.3x EHGO's $30M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30M | $115M | $127M | $299M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$49M | -$75M | -$1M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$53M | -$289M | -$4M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$2M | -$56M | $0 | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +64.3% | +25.8% | +22.8% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.6% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -1.4% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -61.0% | -45.9% | -2.3% | -1.3% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.4% | -2.0% | -44.3% | -2.3% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.1% | -64.9% | -0.9% | +15.3% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -73.3% | -29.9% | +52.0% | +75.8% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EHGO and AIXI and BBAI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $6M | $19.8B | $25M | $3.08T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$956,417 | $51M | $19.7B | $31M | $3.17T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.22x | -0.38x | -5.10x | -3.46x | 30.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 24.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 19.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.09x | 154.88x | 0.15x | 10.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.14x | — | 24.51x | 0.43x | 9.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 43.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-104 for EHGO. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs EHGO's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -103.5% | — | -50.7% | -6.1% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -80.1% | -65.3% | -35.3% | -3.2% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -62.4% | -34.4% | -19.5% | -7.9% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.8% | -3.4% | -19.6% | -9.8% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | — | 0.04x | 0.59x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $45M | -$63M | $6M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $846,593 | $87M | $28M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $46M | $24M | $34M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.42x | -14.13x | -18.17x | — | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBAI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,377 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $117 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +28.6% total return vs EHGO's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.4% vs AIXI's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.4% | +41.9% | -28.4% | -10.9% | -12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.5% | -83.7% | +28.6% | -9.4% | -4.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | -98.8% | +49.8% | +0.0% | +37.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | -98.8% | -57.0% | -69.2% | +73.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | -98.8% | -57.5% | -78.6% | +776.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.6% | -77.2% | +14.4% | +0.0% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPS and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 74.7% from its 52-week high vs EHGO's 8.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.71x | 3.31x | 0.19x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.44 | $4.02 | $9.39 | $1.88 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $0.08 | $3.01 | $0.80 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.3% | +15.2% | +44.5% | +47.9% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.9 | 48.5 | 57.1 | 46.8 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 60.7M | 34.5M | 15K | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.5% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 34.2% for MSFT (target: $557). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.69% vs MSFT's 0.78%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.00 | — | $556.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 4 | — | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +14.7% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 3 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.13 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BBAI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
EHGO vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 6% for Eshallgo Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (EHGO). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) a "Buy" — based on 81 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +73.
8%, compared to -98. 8% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +776. 0% versus AIXI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 1599% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus -20. 6% for Eshallgo Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (EHGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -74. 7% for EHGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43.
5% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
7% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. EHGO, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is EHGO or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 14. 7% yield). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, BBAI: -57. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EHGO and AIXI and BBAI and CLPS and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (EHGO (Industrials) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EHGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS, MSFT pay a dividend while EHGO, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.