EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$1.88B
5Y Perf.+98.4%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EPAC vs GTLS vs HLIO vs FBIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.5%
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$2.25B
5Y Perf.+90.7%
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-27.2%
EPAC vs GTLS vs HLIO vs FBIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EPAC | GTLS | HLIO | FBIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.88B | $9.93B | $2.25B | $4.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $616M | $4.26B | $839M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $90M | $40M | $49M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 32.6% | 32.3% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 21.2% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 16.4x | 27.0x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $228M | $3.74B | $111M | $2.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $366M | $73M | $264M |
EPAC vs GTLS vs HLIO vs FBIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EPAC
GTLS
HLIO
FBIN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enerpac Tool Group … (EPAC) | 100 | 198.4 | +98.4% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.5 | +428.5% |
| Helios Technologies… (HLIO) | 100 | 190.7 | +90.7% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPAC vs GTLS vs HLIO vs FBIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EPAC leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. GTLS and HLIO also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
The Growth Play
EPAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 52.5%, current ratio 2.74x
- PEG 0.11 vs HLIO's 1.00
- 4.6% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs HLIO's 109.8%
- Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61
Best for: long-term compounding
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
HLIO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.56, yield 0.5%, current ratio 2.90x
- +134.6% vs FBIN's -16.8%
Best for: defensive
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Income Pick
FBIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.61, yield 2.5%
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 27.0x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EPAC's 0.1%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EPAC | 4.6% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 27.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | EPAC | 14.6% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EPAC's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HLIO | +134.6% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EPAC | 11.0% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 21.7% vs 7.4% |
EPAC vs GTLS vs HLIO vs FBIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
EPAC vs GTLS vs HLIO vs FBIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEPACLAGGINGHLIO
Who Leads Where
EPAC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBIN leads 2 • GTLS leads 2 • HLIO leads 0
Explore the data ↓HLIOHelios Technologies, …
0leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
2leads
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
2leads
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Co…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GTLSvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EPAC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EPAC5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GTLS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FBIN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 6.9x EPAC's $616M. EPAC is the more profitable business, keeping 14.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, HLIO holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $616M | $4.3B | $839M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $147M | $644M | $129M | $482M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $90M | $40M | $49M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $102M | $203M | $103M | $420M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +32.6% | +32.3% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +8.5% | +7.8% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +0.9% | +5.8% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +4.8% | +12.3% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -2.5% | +17.4% | -106.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | -36.1% | +3.1% | -2.0% |
EPAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EPAC offers better value at 0.12x vs HLIO's 1.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $9.9B | $2.3B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $13.3B | $2.3B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.91x | 628.45x | 46.89x | 15.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.74x | 16.40x | 27.01x | 11.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.12x | — | 1.74x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.59x | 14.33x | 17.74x | 10.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 2.33x | 2.68x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.46x | 2.79x | 2.43x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.40x | 48.95x | 21.72x | 12.77x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPAC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPAC delivers a 20.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. HLIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIO scores 9/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.9% | +1.2% | +5.3% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.7% | +7.4% | +4.4% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.8% | +8.6% | +4.8% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 1.11x | 0.12x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $76M | $3.4B | $38M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $366M | $73M | $264M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $228M | $3.7B | $111M | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.59x | 1.08x | 3.84x | 4.72x |
EPAC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $12,951 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, HLIO leads with a +134.6% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.6% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | +0.6% | +24.7% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.7% | +37.6% | +134.6% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.7% | +62.7% | +11.1% | -36.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.0% | +29.5% | -8.1% | -54.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | +772.5% | +109.8% | -2.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +17.6% | +3.6% | -13.9% |
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.49x | 1.53x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.39 | $208.51 | $76.47 | $64.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.66 | $140.50 | $28.34 | $36.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.6% | +99.5% | +88.9% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 51.2 | 55.2 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 375K | 1.6M | 350K | 2.6M |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EPAC as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", HLIO as "Buy", FBIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.4% upside for FBIN (target: $56) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs EPAC's 0.11%.
| Metric | EPACEnerpac Tool Grou… | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $193.81 | $77.00 | $56.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 37 | 12 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.5% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.60 | $0.36 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +5.3% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EPAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallEnerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EPAC vs GTLS vs HLIO vs FBIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Enerpac Tool Group Corp. wins at 0. 11x versus Helios Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 7% versus FBIN's -4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 226% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Helios Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 23. 9% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN?
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
(EPAC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 0% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPAC leads at 22. 6% versus 7. 9% for HLIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EPAC leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Helios Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 27. 0x for Helios Technologies, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 44. 4% to $56. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 1% for Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC).
09Is EPAC or GTLS or HLIO or FBIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, EPAC: +40. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPAC and GTLS and HLIO and FBIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EPAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HLIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. HLIO, FBIN pay a dividend while EPAC, GTLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EPAC: -0.7% · GTLS: -2.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(EPAC: 20.9x · GTLS: 628.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.