Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EPWK vs FLNC vs UPWK vs STEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EPWK
EPWK Holdings Ltd.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$502K
5Y Perf.-99.6%
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.48B
5Y Perf.+171.7%
UPWK
Upwork Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-15.8%
STEM
Stem, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.+22.4%

EPWK vs FLNC vs UPWK vs STEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EPWK logoEPWK
FLNC logoFLNC
UPWK logoUPWK
STEM logoSTEM
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesRenewable UtilitiesStaffing & Employment ServicesSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$502K$2.48B$1.38B$74M
Revenue (TTM)$37M$2.58B$595M$153M
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-42M$109M$144M
Gross Margin17.6%11.7%103.0%36.3%
Operating Margin-8.8%-1.8%20.7%-35.1%
Forward P/E7.4x
Total Debt$6M$391M$381M$369M
Cash & Equiv.$228K$691M$298M$49M

EPWK vs FLNC vs UPWK vs STEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EPWK
FLNC
UPWK
STEM
StockFeb 25Mar 26Return
EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK)1000.4-99.6%
Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC)100271.7+171.7%
Upwork Inc. (UPWK)10084.2-15.8%
Stem, Inc. (STEM)100122.4+22.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EPWK vs FLNC vs UPWK vs STEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STEM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Upwork Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. FLNC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EPWK
EPWK Holdings Ltd.
The Secondary Option

EPWK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FLNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -45.8% 10Y total return vs UPWK's -49.9%
  • +320.6% vs EPWK's -99.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
The Income Pick

UPWK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.16
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 1.46x
  • Beta 1.16, current ratio 1.46x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
STEM
Stem, Inc.
The Growth Play

STEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 91.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -24.5%
  • 8.1% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1%
  • 94.2% margin vs EPWK's -5.8%
  • 43.2% ROA vs EPWK's -45.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSTEM logoSTEM8.1% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1%
ValueUPWK logoUPWKBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSTEM logoSTEM94.2% margin vs EPWK's -5.8%
Stability / SafetyUPWK logoUPWKBeta 1.16 vs STEM's 3.66
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FLNC logoFLNC+320.6% vs EPWK's -99.7%
Efficiency (ROA)STEM logoSTEM43.2% ROA vs EPWK's -45.7%

EPWK vs FLNC vs UPWK vs STEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

FLNCFluence Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
96.3%$2.2B
Service
3.7%$84M
UPWKUpwork Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
86.7%$683M
Marketplace
13.3%$105M
STEMStem, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
56.1%$88M
Hardware
43.9%$69M

EPWK vs FLNC vs UPWK vs STEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUPWKLAGGINGSTEM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 69.5x EPWK's $37M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPWK's -5.8%. On growth, FLNC holds the edge at +7.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$37M$2.6B$595M$153M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M-$19M$150M-$16M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$42M$109M$144M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$269M$224M-$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+17.6%+11.7%+103.0%+36.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.8%-1.8%+20.7%-35.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.8%-1.6%+18.3%+94.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.0%-10.4%+37.7%-5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.5%+7.7%-100.0%-10.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.3%+33.3%+29.6%+27.2%
UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UPWK leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$501,713$2.5B$1.4B$74M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$2.2B$1.5B$394M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.30x-51.27x12.78x-0.95x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x1.10x1.76x0.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.50x2.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.71x10.82x
UPWK leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UPWK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

UPWK delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-8 for FLNC. UPWK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNC's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UPWK scores 6/9 vs EPWK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.3%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-45.7%-1.8%+8.5%+43.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-15.9%+14.3%-57.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.7%+16.2%-23.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92366
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.71x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M-$300M$83M$320M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$227,826$691M$298M$49M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$391M$381M$369M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.50x146.13x14.43x
UPWK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FLNC five years ago would be worth $5,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for EPWK. Over the past 12 months, FLNC leads with a +320.6% total return vs EPWK's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPWK at 9.7% vs EPWK's -84.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6750.0%-17.6%-46.5%-48.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.7%+320.6%-34.8%-16.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+0.7%+32.0%-89.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-45.8%-74.8%-97.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-45.8%-49.9%-95.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-84.4%+0.2%+9.7%-52.9%
FLNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLNC and UPWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

UPWK is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLNC currently trades 56.6% from its 52-week high vs EPWK's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.00x3.55x1.16x3.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$510.40$33.51$22.84$32.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$3.93$10.02$5.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.1%+56.6%+46.5%+27.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.450.035.051.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded161K5.1M3.4M155K
Evenly matched — FLNC and UPWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FLNC as "Hold", UPWK as "Buy", STEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 137.2% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs 0.9% for FLNC (target: $19).

MetricEPWK logoEPWKEPWK Holdings Ltd.FLNC logoFLNCFluence Energy, I…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.15$23.14$20.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts272317
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%+9.8%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UPWK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FLNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallUpwork Inc. (UPWK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EPWK vs FLNC vs UPWK vs STEM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Stem, Inc.

(STEM) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upwork Inc. (UPWK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM?

Over the past 5 years, Fluence Energy, Inc.

(FLNC) delivered a total return of -45. 8%, compared to -99. 6% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNC returned -45. 8% versus EPWK's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 216% more volatile than UPWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Upwork Inc. (UPWK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 71% for Fluence Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stem, Inc.

(STEM) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -408. 3% for Fluence Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLNC leads at 23. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM?

Stem, Inc.

(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -6. 0% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -38. 7% for STEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 137.

2% to $20. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is EPWK or FLNC or UPWK or STEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16)). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPWK: -49. 9%, STEM: -95. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EPWK and FLNC and UPWK and STEM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EPWK (Industrials) and FLNC (Utilities) and UPWK (Industrials) and STEM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EPWK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLNC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EPWK and FLNC and UPWK and STEM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EPWK: -27.5% · FLNC: 7.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.