Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EQBK vs SBCF vs FFIN vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
EQBK vs SBCF vs FFIN vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $969M | $3.03B | $4.61B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $327M | $870M | $739M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $145M | $243M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 66.7% | 61.6% | 70.8% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 21.4% | 36.8% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 12.4x | 15.9x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $313M | $1.34B | $197M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $384M | $181M | $763M | $52M |
EQBK vs SBCF vs FFIN vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Bancshares, … (EQBK) | 100 | 280.7 | +180.7% |
| Seacoast Banking Co… (SBCF) | 100 | 142.7 | +42.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQBK vs SBCF vs FFIN vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 45.3%, EPS growth 7.0%
- PEG 0.50 vs SBCF's 6.62
- NIM 3.5% vs SBCF's 2.7%
- 45.3% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
SBCF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +31.5% vs FFIN's -3.2%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs EQBK's 125.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.3% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.82 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs SBCF's 1.19 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.5% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% |
EQBK vs SBCF vs FFIN vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EQBK vs SBCF vs FFIN vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 2 • EQBK leads 1 • SBCF leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBCF is the larger business by revenue, generating $870M annually — 2.8x IBCP's $315M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBCF's 16.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $327M | $870M | $739M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $202M | $310M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $145M | $243M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $179M | $290M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.7% | +61.6% | +70.8% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +21.4% | +36.8% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +16.7% | +30.2% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +20.6% | +39.6% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -27.5% | -7.7% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 50% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EQBK offers better value at 0.57x vs SBCF's 10.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $969M | $3.0B | $4.6B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $898M | $4.2B | $4.0B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.45x | 19.65x | 20.76x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.04x | 12.41x | 15.92x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 10.49x | 3.98x | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.15x | 22.45x | 14.17x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.97x | 3.49x | 6.23x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 0.93x | 2.89x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.83x | 16.95x | 15.73x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $2 for EQBK. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EQBK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SBCF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +5.8% | +13.3% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +0.8% | +1.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +3.9% | +11.0% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +3.7% | +16.0% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.44x | 0.12x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$71M | $1.2B | -$566M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $384M | $181M | $763M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $313M | $1.3B | $197M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 0.66x | 1.48x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, SBCF leads with a +31.5% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | -1.2% | +8.5% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +31.5% | -3.2% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.0% | +67.4% | +29.1% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | -10.7% | -28.2% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.1% | +121.9% | +145.4% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.2% | +18.7% | +8.9% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
EQBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EQBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBCF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQBK currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.19x | 0.95x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.07 | $35.55 | $38.74 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.04 | $23.48 | $28.11 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +87.3% | +83.6% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 48.7 | 58.2 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 111K | 741K | 740K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
IBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EQBK as "Hold", SBCF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 4.7% for SBCF (target: $33). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.05% vs EQBK's 1.10%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.50 | $32.50 | $39.25 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 16 | 15 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.4% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 6 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $0.74 | $0.72 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FFIN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
EQBK vs SBCF vs FFIN vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is the stronger pick with 45. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Equity Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SBCF's +121. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 19β — meaning SBCF is approximately 56% more volatile than EQBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 53% for Equity Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is pulling ahead at 45. 3% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Equity Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 700. 0% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for Independent Bank Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 16. 7% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 21. 4% for SBCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK).
09Is EQBK or SBCF or FFIN or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 1. 1% yield, +125. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQBK: +125. 1%, SBCF: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQBK and SBCF and FFIN and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EQBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.