Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ERIE vs MMC vs AON vs TRV vs HIG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
ERIE vs MMC vs AON vs TRV vs HIG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $10.01B | $85.27B | $67.19B | $64.62B | $36.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.33B | $26.45B | $17.49B | $48.83B | $28.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $571M | $4.13B | $3.94B | $6.29B | $4.06B |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 42.3% | 55.9% | 36.9% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 23.2% | 27.0% | 16.0% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.1x | 16.9x | 16.5x | 10.7x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21.86B | $16.53B | $9.27B | $4.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $346M | $2.40B | $1.20B | $842M | $133M |
ERIE vs MMC vs AON vs TRV vs HIG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Marsh & McLennan Co… (MMC) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| Aon plc (AON) | 100 | 159.2 | +59.2% |
| The Travelers Compa… (TRV) | 100 | 279.4 | +179.4% |
| The Hartford Financ… (HIG) | 100 | 346.5 | +246.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ERIE vs MMC vs AON vs TRV vs HIG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ERIE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRV's 1.4%
- 17.3% ROA vs TRV's 4.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 15.3%
MMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, current ratio 1.13x
AON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 36.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs TRV's 5.2%
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs TRV's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
- Beta 0.10 vs HIG's 0.29
TRV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +12.8% vs ERIE's -38.7%
HIG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 233.5% 10Y total return vs AON's 219.8%
- PEG 0.44 vs ERIE's 1.26
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.44 vs 0.51
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs TRV's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.44 vs 0.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs TRV's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs HIG's 0.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRV's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs ERIE's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs TRV's 4.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 15.3% |
ERIE vs MMC vs AON vs TRV vs HIG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ERIE vs MMC vs AON vs TRV vs HIG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIG leads in 2 of 6 categories
AON leads 1 • ERIE leads 1 • MMC leads 0 • TRV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRV is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.8B annually — 11.3x ERIE's $4.3B. AON is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRV's 12.9%. On growth, MMC holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $26.5B | $17.5B | $48.8B | $28.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $786M | $7.0B | $5.4B | $8.5B | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $571M | $4.1B | $3.9B | $6.3B | $4.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $537M | $5.1B | $3.5B | $7.9B | $5.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +42.3% | +55.9% | +36.9% | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +23.2% | +27.0% | +16.0% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +15.6% | +22.5% | +12.9% | +14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +19.3% | +20.0% | +16.2% | +20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +11.5% | +6.4% | +3.5% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | 0.0% | +27.1% | +23.4% | +40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HIG leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, HIG trades at a 53% valuation discount to MMC's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HIG offers better value at 0.44x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.0B | $85.3B | $67.2B | $64.6B | $36.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.7B | $104.7B | $82.5B | $73.0B | $40.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.41x | 21.28x | 18.42x | 10.90x | 9.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.15x | 16.89x | 16.50x | 10.69x | 10.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.50x | 1.11x | 1.23x | 0.52x | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.14x | 15.96x | 15.54x | 8.62x | 7.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 3.49x | 3.91x | 1.32x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.00x | 6.38x | 7.11x | 2.07x | 2.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.53x | 21.39x | 20.88x | — | 6.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AON delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $19 for TRV. HIG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AON's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIG scores 9/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.0% | +26.9% | +44.2% | +19.1% | +22.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.3% | +7.0% | +7.6% | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.5% | +15.2% | +13.5% | +15.3% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.0% | +17.8% | +16.2% | +8.6% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.62x | 1.73x | 0.28x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$346M | $19.5B | $15.3B | $8.4B | $4.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $346M | $2.4B | $1.2B | $842M | $133M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21.9B | $16.5B | $9.3B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.66x | 9.58x | 19.34x | 20.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIG five years ago would be worth $21,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,482 for ERIE. Over the past 12 months, TRV leads with a +12.8% total return vs ERIE's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIG at 25.3% vs AON's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | -3.6% | -8.5% | +5.2% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.7% | -22.0% | -12.0% | +12.8% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.2% | +2.0% | -3.2% | +70.6% | +96.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.8% | +36.5% | +26.2% | +98.2% | +112.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.6% | +209.8% | +219.8% | +201.4% | +233.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +0.7% | -1.1% | +19.5% | +25.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AON and TRV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AON is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIG's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRV currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs ERIE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | 0.14x | 0.10x | 0.22x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $380.67 | $235.78 | $381.00 | $313.12 | $144.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $210.06 | $170.37 | $304.59 | $249.19 | $119.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.9% | +73.8% | +82.3% | +95.4% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.6 | 37.2 | 37.9 | 50.5 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 231K | 2.7M | 1.2M | 1.3M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ERIE and TRV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MMC as "Hold", AON as "Buy", TRV as "Hold", HIG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.0% upside for AON (target: $404) vs 4.7% for TRV (target: $313). For income investors, ERIE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.23% vs AON's 0.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $206.75 | $404.40 | $313.00 | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 38 | 43 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.8% | +0.9% | +1.4% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 19 | 14 | 20 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.83 | $3.05 | $2.91 | $4.30 | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.5% | +4.8% | +4.4% |
HIG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). AON leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ERIE vs MMC vs AON vs TRV vs HIG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aon plc (AON) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aon plc (AON) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG?
On trailing P/E, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
(HIG) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG?
Over the past 5 years, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
(HIG) delivered a total return of +112. 7%, compared to +14. 8% for Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIG returned +233. 5% versus ERIE's +171. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aon plc (AON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 0. 29β — meaning HIG is approximately 204% more volatile than AON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 173% for Aon plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aon plc (AON) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus 5. 2% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aon plc grew EPS 36. 3% year-over-year, compared to -7. 5% for Erie Indemnity Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ERIE leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG?
Aon plc (AON) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
5% net margin versus 12. 9% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AON leads at 25. 3% versus 16. 0% for TRV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AON leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AON: 29. 0% to $404. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 9% for Aon plc (AON).
09Is ERIE or MMC or AON or TRV or HIG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aon plc (AON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10), 0. 9% yield, +219. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AON: +219. 8%, HIG: +233. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ERIE and MMC and AON and TRV and HIG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HIG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.