Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ESHA vs PSFE vs SOFI vs EVTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Infrastructure
ESHA vs PSFE vs SOFI vs EVTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $124M | $485M | $20.40B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B | $4.77B | $951M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-183M | $481M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% | 75.1% | 46.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% | 11.0% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x | 26.5x | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.66B | $1.82B | $1.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.35B | $4.93B | $306M |
ESHA vs PSFE vs SOFI vs EVTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESH Acquisition Cor… (ESHA) | 100 | 114.1 | +14.1% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 193.0 | +93.0% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESHA vs PSFE vs SOFI vs EVTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESHA is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 59.6% vs SOFI's 4.4%
- 59.6% margin vs PSFE's -10.7%
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.0x)
SOFI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs ESHA's -77.9%
- +23.0% vs PSFE's -37.1%
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 52.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 2.07x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.8% NII/revenue growth vs ESHA's -77.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 6.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 59.6% margin vs PSFE's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs SOFI's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.0% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs ESHA's -16.1%, ROIC 10.2% vs -12K% |
ESHA vs PSFE vs SOFI vs EVTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ESHA vs PSFE vs SOFI vs EVTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EVTC leads in 3 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • SOFI leads 1 • ESHA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVTC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOFI and ESHA operate at a comparable scale, with $4.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -10.7%. On growth, EVTC holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $4.8B | $951M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $371M | $760M | $316M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$183M | $481M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $136M | -$2.6B | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% | +75.1% | +46.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% | +11.0% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% | +10.1% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% | -83.5% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | — | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | -183.3% | -56.7% | -24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 74% valuation discount to SOFI's 41.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ESHA's 24.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $124M | $485M | $20.4B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $122M | $1.8B | $17.3B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -2.99x | 41.03x | 10.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x | 26.45x | 5.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.70x | 4.53x | 22.75x | 7.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x | 4.28x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.84x | 0.83x | 1.91x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x | — | 10.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESHA delivers a 59841.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59841 in annual profit, vs $-24 for PSFE. SOFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +59841.2% | -24.1% | +5.9% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.1% | -3.8% | +1.1% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11530.1% | +3.6% | +3.6% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15373.5% | +3.6% | +1.2% | +10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x | 0.17x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $1.3B | -$3.1B | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $1.3B | $4.9B | $306M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.84x | 0.45x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESHA five years ago would be worth $11,467 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, SOFI leads with a +23.0% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.1% | +17.7% | -41.7% | -18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | -37.1% | +23.0% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.7% | -34.9% | +192.5% | -31.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.7% | -94.2% | -3.1% | -43.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.7% | -92.1% | +52.7% | +89.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.7% | -13.3% | +43.0% | -11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ESHA and EVTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESHA is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOFI's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVTC currently trades 60.6% from its 52-week high vs ESHA's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.19x | 2.35x | 2.54x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.00 | $16.49 | $32.73 | $38.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.92 | $5.95 | $12.56 | $22.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.9% | +56.9% | +48.9% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 65.3 | 41.9 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 361K | 65.8M | 431K |
Analyst Outlook
EVTC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", EVTC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for EVTC (target: $37) vs 6.5% for PSFE (target: $10). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $20.89 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 27 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +93.7% | +20.9% | +0.3% | +4.8% |
EVTC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ESHA vs PSFE vs SOFI vs EVTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is the stronger pick with 28. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. at 41. 0x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC?
Over the past 5 years, ESH Acquisition Corp.
(ESHA) delivered a total return of +14. 7%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ESH Acquisition Corp.
(ESHA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus SoFi Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning SOFI is approximately -1405% more volatile than ESHA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoFi Technologies, Inc.
(SOFI) is pulling ahead at 28. 8% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ESH Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 999999% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVTC leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus 0. 0% for ESHA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOFI leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 58. 4% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ESHA, PSFE, SOFI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESHA or PSFE or SOFI or EVTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ESH Acquisition Corp.
(ESHA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESHA: +14. 7%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESHA and PSFE and SOFI and EVTC?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESHA (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and SOFI (Financial Services) and EVTC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESHA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock. EVTC pays a dividend while ESHA, PSFE, SOFI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.