Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ESNT vs PFSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ESNT
Essent Group Ltd.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$5.87B
5Y Perf.+82.1%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.56B
5Y Perf.+160.5%

ESNT vs PFSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ESNT logoESNT
PFSI logoPFSI
IndustryInsurance - SpecialtyFinancial - Mortgages
Market Cap$5.87B$4.56B
Revenue (TTM)$1.31B$4.36B
Net Income (TTM)$703M$507M
Gross Margin89.7%91.4%
Operating Margin63.6%34.6%
Forward P/E8.5x7.1x
Total Debt$494M$23.06B
Cash & Equiv.$131M$302M

ESNT vs PFSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ESNT
PFSI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT)100182.1+82.1%
PennyMac Financial … (PFSI)100260.5+160.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ESNT vs PFSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ESNT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ESNT
Essent Group Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

ESNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 1.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 8.8%
  • Beta 0.38, yield 1.8%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PFSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs ESNT's 216.5%
  • 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs ESNT's 12.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFSI logoPFSI173.8% NII/revenue growth vs ESNT's 12.0%
ValuePFSI logoPFSILower P/E (7.1x vs 8.5x)
Quality / MarginsESNT logoESNT53.7% margin vs PFSI's 11.5%
Stability / SafetyESNT logoESNTBeta 0.38 vs PFSI's 0.93, lower leverage
DividendsESNT logoESNT1.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%
Momentum (1Y)ESNT logoESNT+5.1% vs PFSI's -9.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ESNT logoESNT9.6% ROA vs PFSI's 1.8%, ROIC 11.3% vs 4.4%

ESNT vs PFSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ESNTEssent Group Ltd.
FY 2024
Mortgage Insurance Segment
90.7%$1.1B
Corporate Segment
9.3%$116M
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Mortgage banking Production
63.1%$1.3B
Mortgage banking Servicing
36.9%$737M

ESNT vs PFSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLESNTLAGGINGPFSI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ESNT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

PFSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 3.3x ESNT's $1.3B. ESNT is the more profitable business, keeping 53.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFSI's 11.5%.

MetricESNT logoESNTEssent Group Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$4.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$838M$1.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$703M$507M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$837M-$3.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.7%+91.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+63.6%+34.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+53.7%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+64.0%-32.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.2%+7.7%
ESNT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFSI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.8x trailing earnings, ESNT trades at a 7% valuation discount to PFSI's 9.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESNT's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFSI's 18.1x.

MetricESNT logoESNTEssent Group Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
Market CapShares × price$5.9B$4.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.2B$27.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.78x9.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.48x7.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.23x18.07x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.63x1.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.14x1.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.86x
PFSI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ESNT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

ESNT delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $12 for PFSI. ESNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESNT scores 5/9 vs PFSI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricESNT logoESNTEssent Group Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.2%+12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.6%+1.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.3%+4.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.6%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x5.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$362M$22.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$131M$302M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$494M$23.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense26.45x0.96x
ESNT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PFSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $15,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,554 for ESNT. Over the past 12 months, ESNT leads with a +5.1% total return vs PFSI's -9.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFSI at 15.7% vs ESNT's 14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricESNT logoESNTEssent Group Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.4%-33.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+5.1%-9.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.3%+54.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.5%+53.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+216.5%+598.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.3%+15.7%
PFSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ESNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ESNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFSI's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESNT currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs PFSI's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricESNT logoESNTEssent Group Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.38x0.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$67.09$160.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$55.22$82.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.7%+54.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.947.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded635K601K
ESNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ESNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates ESNT as "Buy" and PFSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.5% upside for PFSI (target: $143) vs 15.2% for ESNT (target: $69). For income investors, ESNT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.84% vs PFSI's 1.33%.

MetricESNT logoESNTEssent Group Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$69.33$143.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1920
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises62
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.11$1.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.9%+0.1%
ESNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ESNT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFSI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallEssent Group Ltd. (ESNT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ESNT vs PFSI: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ESNT or PFSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 0% for Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT). Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ESNT or PFSI?

On trailing P/E, Essent Group Ltd.

(ESNT) is the cheapest at 8. 8x versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. at 9. 4x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ESNT or PFSI?

Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) delivered a total return of +53. 5%, compared to +25. 5% for Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +598. 9% versus ESNT's +216. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ESNT or PFSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essent Group Ltd.

(ESNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning PFSI is approximately 145% more volatile than ESNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ESNT or PFSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus 12. 0% for Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 59. 2% year-over-year, compared to 5. 4% for Essent Group Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ESNT or PFSI?

Essent Group Ltd.

(ESNT) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 6% net margin versus 11. 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 57. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESNT leads at 67. 5% versus 34. 6% for PFSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESNT leads at 93. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ESNT or PFSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for Essent Group Ltd. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 63. 5% to $143. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ESNT or PFSI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 1. 3% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI).

09

Is ESNT or PFSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Essent Group Ltd.

(ESNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 8% yield, +216. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESNT: +216. 5%, PFSI: +598. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ESNT and PFSI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ESNT is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ESNT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 32%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 86%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ESNT and PFSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ESNT: 0.7% · PFSI: 173.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(ESNT: 53.7% · PFSI: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ESNT: 8.8x · PFSI: 9.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.