Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ETOR vs UP vs HOOD vs FLYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Information Technology Services
ETOR vs UP vs HOOD vs FLYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.81B | $242M | $68.72B | $2.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.62B | $736M | $4.47B | $188.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $206M | $-294M | $1.90B | $12.54B |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | 2.2% | 83.3% | 0.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -34.3% | 46.8% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | — | 40.5x | 49.5x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $157M | $15.41B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.57B | $134M | $4.26B | $330M |
ETOR vs UP vs HOOD vs FLYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| eToro Group Ltd. (ETOR) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 25.5 | -74.5% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 100 | 115.3 | +15.3% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 164.9 | +64.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETOR vs UP vs HOOD vs FLYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETOR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 225.7%, EPS growth 11.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.90, Low D/E 5.8%, current ratio 3.52x
- 225.7% NII/revenue growth vs UP's -7.0%
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 49.5x)
UP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 119.1% 10Y total return vs ETOR's -26.5%
- 42.1% margin vs UP's -39.9%
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- beta 1.32
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 1.32 vs HOOD's 3.05
- +62.7% vs UP's -71.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 225.7% NII/revenue growth vs UP's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.1% margin vs UP's -39.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs HOOD's 3.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs UP's -71.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs UP's -29.1% |
ETOR vs UP vs HOOD vs FLYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ETOR vs UP vs HOOD vs FLYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories
ETOR leads 2 • FLYW leads 1 • UP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 256.1x UP's $736M. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UP's -39.9%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.6B | $736M | $4.5B | $188.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $300M | -$191M | $2.2B | $10.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $206M | -$294M | $1.9B | $12.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $254M | -$270M | $2.2B | -$15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +2.2% | +83.3% | +0.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -34.3% | +46.8% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -39.9% | +42.1% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -36.7% | +36.3% | -8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.2% | — | +1408.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +69.2% | +2.7% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ETOR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, ETOR trades at a 97% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HOOD's 36.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $242M | $68.7B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1.7B | $265M | $79.9B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.37x | -0.80x | 37.21x | 161.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.82x | — | 40.47x | 49.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.14x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -6.08x | — | 36.63x | 47.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.33x | 15.36x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | — | 7.66x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.78x | — | 42.34x | 21.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETOR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOOD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. ETOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOOD's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETOR scores 6/9 vs UP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.0% | — | +21.4% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | -29.1% | +4.7% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.8% | — | +7.9% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.5% | -167.1% | +24.0% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | — | 1.68x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.5B | $23M | $11.1B | -$330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $134M | $4.3B | $330M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $157M | $15.4B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.93x | -2.21x | 97.05x | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $21,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for UP. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs UP's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 104.6% vs UP's -59.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | -49.2% | -33.8% | +27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.5% | -71.4% | +52.6% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.5% | -93.2% | +756.1% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.5% | -99.7% | +119.1% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.5% | -99.7% | +119.1% | -49.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.7% | -59.3% | +104.6% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FLYW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLYW is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs UP's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 2.50x | 3.05x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.96 | $70.00 | $153.86 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.74 | $0.75 | $48.32 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.8% | +9.6% | +49.6% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 38.9 | 51.0 | 83.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 131K | 29.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETOR as "Buy", UP as "Hold", HOOD as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7373.8% upside for UP (target: $500) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.86 | $500.00 | $117.14 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 9 | 25 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +1.0% | +3.7% |
HOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ETOR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
ETOR vs UP vs HOOD vs FLYW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, eToro Group Ltd.
(ETOR) is the stronger pick with 225. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). eToro Group Ltd. (ETOR) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate eToro Group Ltd. (ETOR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW?
On trailing P/E, eToro Group Ltd.
(ETOR) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, eToro Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW?
Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) delivered a total return of +119. 1%, compared to -99. 7% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOOD returned +119. 1% versus UP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately 132% more volatile than FLYW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, eToro Group Ltd. (ETOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), eToro Group Ltd.
(ETOR) is pulling ahead at 225. 7% versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: eToro Group Ltd. grew EPS 1117% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for Wheels Up Experience Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW?
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -39. 9% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 46. 8% versus -34. 3% for UP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 83. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eToro Group Ltd.
(ETOR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 34. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UP: 7373. 8% to $500. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ETOR or UP or HOOD or FLYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLYW: -49. 5%, UP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETOR and UP and HOOD and FLYW?
These companies operate in different sectors (ETOR (Financial Services) and UP (Industrials) and HOOD (Financial Services) and FLYW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ETOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.