Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ETR vs AEP vs SO vs EXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
ETR vs AEP vs SO vs EXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $51.29B | $71.69B | $104.20B | $45.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.29B | $22.16B | $30.17B | $24.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.80B | $3.65B | $4.36B | $2.78B |
| Gross Margin | 43.3% | 40.4% | 43.1% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 23.5% | 24.1% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | 25.5x | 20.8x | 20.2x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $30.93B | $50.24B | $65.82B | $50.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $268M | $1.64B | $1.15B |
ETR vs AEP vs SO vs EXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entergy Corporation (ETR) | 100 | 220.1 | +120.1% |
| American Electric P… (AEP) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 162.0 | +62.0% |
| Exelon Corporation (EXC) | 100 | 162.6 | +62.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETR vs AEP vs SO vs EXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 246.8% 10Y total return vs AEP's 146.9%
- +36.0% vs EXC's -0.7%
AEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 0.45x
- PEG 2.43 vs ETR's 10.06
SO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.6% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3%
EXC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta -0.14, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.92x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3% | |
| Value | PEG 2.43 vs 3.45 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs EXC's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs ETR's 0.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs EXC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.0% vs EXC's -0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs EXC's 2.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs 5.1% |
ETR vs AEP vs SO vs EXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ETR vs AEP vs SO vs EXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AEP leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXC leads 1 • ETR leads 1 • SO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SO is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.2B annually — 2.3x ETR's $13.3B. AEP is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXC's 11.2%. On growth, ETR holds the edge at +12.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $22.2B | $30.2B | $24.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.5B | $8.8B | $13.3B | $8.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $3.7B | $4.4B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.0B | $840M | -$3.8B | -$2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.3% | +40.4% | +43.1% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +23.5% | +24.1% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +16.5% | +14.5% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.6% | +3.8% | -12.7% | -8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +6.8% | +8.0% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +6.7% | -0.8% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
EXC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, EXC trades at a 43% valuation discount to ETR's 28.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AEP offers better value at 2.32x vs ETR's 11.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $51.3B | $71.7B | $104.2B | $45.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82.2B | $121.7B | $168.4B | $94.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.65x | 19.78x | 23.58x | 16.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.50x | 20.77x | 20.21x | 15.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.30x | 2.32x | 4.03x | 2.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.70x | 13.84x | 12.66x | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.96x | 3.29x | 3.53x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.93x | 2.13x | 2.64x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEP delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for EXC. AEP carries lower financial leverage with a 1.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ETR's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEP scores 7/9 vs EXC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +11.5% | +11.3% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +3.2% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +5.1% | +5.3% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +5.5% | +5.4% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.80x | 1.56x | 1.69x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30.9B | $50.0B | $64.2B | $49.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $268M | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.9B | $50.2B | $65.8B | $50.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.70x | 2.61x | 2.51x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ETR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETR five years ago would be worth $22,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,062 for SO. Over the past 12 months, ETR leads with a +36.0% total return vs EXC's -0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ETR at 30.6% vs EXC's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.7% | +14.6% | +6.9% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.0% | +26.1% | +3.6% | -0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.9% | +54.7% | +35.5% | +14.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.6% | +70.7% | +60.6% | +61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +246.8% | +146.9% | +137.8% | +125.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.6% | +15.7% | +10.7% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ETR and SO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETR's 0.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETR currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs EXC's 87.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.01x | -0.15x | -0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.44 | $139.44 | $100.84 | $50.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $79.40 | $97.46 | $83.09 | $41.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +94.5% | +91.7% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 46.5 | 43.5 | 33.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 2.9M | 4.5M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AEP and EXC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETR as "Buy", AEP as "Buy", SO as "Hold", EXC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for EXC (target: $49) vs 3.4% for AEP (target: $136). For income investors, EXC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs ETR's 2.13%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.92 | $136.20 | $99.62 | $49.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 35 | 33 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.9% | +2.9% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 21 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.39 | $3.86 | $2.72 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AEP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ETR vs AEP vs SO vs EXC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETR or AEP or SO or EXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger pick with 10.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Entergy Corporation (ETR) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETR or AEP or SO or EXC?
On trailing P/E, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the cheapest at 16.
2x versus Entergy Corporation at 28. 7x. On forward P/E, Exelon Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Electric Power Company, Inc. wins at 2. 43x versus Entergy Corporation's 10. 06x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETR or AEP or SO or EXC?
Over the past 5 years, Entergy Corporation (ETR) delivered a total return of +127.
6%, compared to +60. 6% for The Southern Company (SO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETR returned +246. 8% versus EXC's +125. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETR or AEP or SO or EXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Entergy Corporation's 0. 30β — meaning ETR is approximately -300% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 156% versus 180% for Entergy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETR or AEP or SO or EXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Southern Company (SO) is pulling ahead at 10.
6% versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entergy Corporation grew EPS 59. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETR or AEP or SO or EXC?
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 11. 4% for Exelon Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SO leads at 24. 6% versus 21. 2% for EXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEP leads at 31. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETR or AEP or SO or EXC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 43x versus Entergy Corporation's 10. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Exelon Corporation (EXC) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Entergy Corporation — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXC: 10. 7% to $49. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETR or AEP or SO or EXC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 1% for Entergy Corporation (ETR).
09Is ETR or AEP or SO or EXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 9% yield, +137. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +137. 8%, ETR: +246. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETR and AEP and SO and EXC?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ETR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AEP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.