Trucking
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ETS vs ARCB vs ODFL vs HTLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
Trucking
Trucking
ETS vs ARCB vs ODFL vs HTLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Trucking | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $9M | $2.52B | $39.81B | $956M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $4.04B | $5.50B | $806M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-208K | $56M | $1.02B | $-52M |
| Gross Margin | 7.1% | 4.1% | 32.2% | -0.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 2.2% | 24.8% | -7.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.9x | 35.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $647K | $669M | $141M | $161M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55K | $102M | $120M | $18M |
ETS vs ARCB vs ODFL vs HTLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) | 100 | 504.3 | +404.3% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| Heartland Express, … (HTLD) | 100 | 56.3 | -43.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETS vs ARCB vs ODFL vs HTLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- -4.0% revenue growth vs HTLD's -23.1%
- Better valuation composite
- +61.1% vs ETS's -84.2%
ODFL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth -5.5%, EPS growth -11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.2%
- 8.2% 10Y total return vs ARCB's 6.0%
- 18.6% margin vs ETS's -8.6%
- 0.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs HTLD's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HTLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 21.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 1.33, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 1.33 vs ARCB's 1.85, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.0% revenue growth vs HTLD's -23.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs ETS's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs ARCB's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs HTLD's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.1% vs ETS's -84.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs ETS's -28.8%, ROIC 23.6% vs -22.5% |
ETS vs ARCB vs ODFL vs HTLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ETS vs ARCB vs ODFL vs HTLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARCB leads 2 • ETS leads 0 • HTLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 2265.6x ETS's $2M. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ETS's -8.6%. On growth, ARCB holds the edge at +3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $4.0B | $5.5B | $806M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $217M | $1.7B | $97M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $56M | $1.0B | -$52M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $169M | $955M | -$67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +4.1% | +32.2% | -0.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +2.2% | +24.8% | -7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +1.4% | +18.6% | -6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +4.2% | +17.4% | -8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.3% | -5.7% | -26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -138.5% | -11.4% | -9.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.5x trailing earnings, ODFL trades at a 8% valuation discount to ARCB's 43.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HTLD's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ETS's 239.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $2.5B | $39.8B | $956M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $3.1B | $39.8B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -44.34x | 43.10x | 39.54x | -18.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.90x | 35.73x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.53x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 239.13x | 11.83x | 23.08x | 11.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.82x | 0.63x | 7.24x | 1.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 231.83x | 2.00x | 9.30x | 1.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.05x | 41.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ETS. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ETS's 16.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETS scores 6/9 vs HTLD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.2% | +4.3% | +24.0% | -6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.8% | +2.3% | +18.5% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.5% | +3.9% | +23.6% | -4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.1% | +5.1% | +27.1% | -5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 16.20x | 0.52x | 0.03x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $592,611 | $567M | $21M | $143M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54,712 | $102M | $120M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $647,323 | $669M | $141M | $161M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.33x | 6.58x | 4601.85x | -4.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ODFL five years ago would be worth $15,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,584 for ETS. Over the past 12 months, ARCB leads with a +61.1% total return vs ETS's -84.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCB at 9.4% vs ETS's -45.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.1% | +46.6% | +20.2% | +35.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.2% | +61.1% | +9.1% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +30.8% | +26.0% | -17.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +41.6% | +52.2% | -27.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +595.2% | +822.8% | -22.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.9% | +9.4% | +8.0% | -6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ETS and HTLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETS is the less volatile stock with a -0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCB's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTLD currently trades 88.6% from its 52-week high vs ETS's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.58x | 1.85x | 1.36x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.23 | $135.10 | $233.79 | $13.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $59.43 | $126.01 | $7.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.1% | +83.6% | +81.7% | +88.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 54.0 | 41.2 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 74K | 296K | 2.1M | 389K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ODFL and HTLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARCB as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold", HTLD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for ODFL (target: $208) vs 3.7% for ARCB (target: $117). For income investors, HTLD offers the higher dividend yield at 0.65% vs ARCB's 0.42%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $117.14 | $208.19 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 36 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.6% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.48 | $1.12 | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.0% | +1.8% | +1.1% |
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
ETS vs ARCB vs ODFL vs HTLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) is the stronger pick with -4.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for Heartland Express, Inc. (HTLD). Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) offers the better valuation at 39. 5x trailing P/E (35. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD?
On trailing P/E, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the cheapest at 39. 5x versus ArcBest Corporation at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, ArcBest Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD?
Over the past 5 years, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) delivered a total return of +52. 2%, compared to -84. 2% for Elite Express Holding Inc. (ETS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ODFL returned +822. 8% versus ETS's -84. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elite Express Holding Inc.
(ETS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 58β versus ArcBest Corporation's 1. 85β — meaning ARCB is approximately -416% more volatile than ETS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 16% for Elite Express Holding Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) is pulling ahead at -4.
0% versus -23. 1% for Heartland Express, Inc. (HTLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. grew EPS -11. 9% year-over-year, compared to -76. 3% for Heartland Express, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ODFL leads at -4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -8. 6% for Elite Express Holding Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus -7. 8% for ETS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ODFL leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) trades at 21.
9x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ODFL: 9. 0% to $208. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD?
In this comparison, HTLD (0.
6% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield), ARCB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ETS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ETS or ARCB or ODFL or HTLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Elite Express Holding Inc.
(ETS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 58)). ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETS: -84. 2%, ARCB: +595. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETS and ARCB and ODFL and HTLD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ODFL, HTLD pay a dividend while ETS, ARCB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.