Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
EXC vs SO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
EXC vs SO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $46.05B | $105.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.79B | $30.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.78B | $4.36B |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 21.0% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $50.55B | $65.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.15B | $1.64B |
EXC vs SO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exelon Corporation (EXC) | 100 | 164.8 | +64.8% |
| The Southern Company (SO) | 100 | 163.9 | +63.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXC vs SO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -0.14, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.14, current ratio 0.92x
SO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 141.5% 10Y total return vs EXC's 124.7%
- 10.6% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3%
- 14.5% margin vs EXC's 11.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs EXC's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 20.4x), PEG 2.50 vs 3.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs EXC's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (169.3% vs 175.5%) | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SO's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs EXC's +0.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs SO's 2.8%, ROIC 5.1% vs 5.3% |
EXC vs SO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EXC vs SO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SO and EXC operate at a comparable scale, with $30.2B and $24.8B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.5% (SO) to 11.2% (EXC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.8B | $30.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.9B | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.8B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.2B | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +43.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +14.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | -12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EXC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.4x trailing earnings, EXC trades at a 31% valuation discount to SO's 23.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EXC offers better value at 2.57x vs SO's 4.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.1B | $105.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $95.5B | $169.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.43x | 23.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.78x | 20.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.57x | 4.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.86x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 3.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SO delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for EXC. SO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXC's 1.76x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.76x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49.4B | $64.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50.6B | $65.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.42x | 2.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXC five years ago would be worth $16,447 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,277 for SO. Over the past 12 months, SO leads with a +5.8% total return vs EXC's +0.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SO at 11.1% vs EXC's 5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.5% | +8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.8% | +5.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.1% | +37.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.5% | +62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.7% | +141.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.1% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXC's -0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SO currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs EXC's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.65 | $100.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.71 | $83.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.6 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.2M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
EXC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EXC as "Hold" and SO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for EXC (target: $49) vs 6.5% for SO (target: $100). For income investors, EXC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.55% vs SO's 2.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.18 | $99.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $2.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
EXC vs SO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXC or SO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger pick with 10.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Exelon Corporation (EXC) a "Hold" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXC or SO?
On trailing P/E, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the cheapest at 16.
4x versus The Southern Company at 23. 9x. On forward P/E, Exelon Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Exelon Corporation wins at 2. 50x versus The Southern Company's 3. 49x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXC or SO?
Over the past 5 years, Exelon Corporation (EXC) delivered a total return of +64.
5%, compared to +62. 8% for The Southern Company (SO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SO returned +141. 5% versus EXC's +124. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXC or SO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Southern Company (SO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Exelon Corporation's -0. 14β — meaning EXC is approximately -7% more volatile than SO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Southern Company (SO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 176% for Exelon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EXC or SO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Southern Company (SO) is pulling ahead at 10.
6% versus 5. 3% for Exelon Corporation (EXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exelon Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXC or SO?
The Southern Company (SO) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus 11. 4% for Exelon Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SO leads at 24. 6% versus 21. 2% for EXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SO leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EXC or SO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Exelon Corporation (EXC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 50x versus The Southern Company's 3. 49x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Exelon Corporation (EXC) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for The Southern Company — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXC: 9. 2% to $49. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — EXC or SO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exelon Corporation (EXC) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 9% for The Southern Company (SO).
09Is EXC or SO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Southern Company (SO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 9% yield, +141. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SO: +141. 5%, EXC: +124. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EXC and SO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EXC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.