Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EXFY vs APPF vs PCTY vs PAYC vs HUBS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
EXFY vs APPF vs PCTY vs PAYC vs HUBS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $91M | $6.00B | $6.04B | $7.47B | $10.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $995M | $1.73B | $2.09B | $3.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $152M | $258M | $470M | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 63.2% | 69.3% | 79.7% | 83.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | 17.1% | 21.3% | 28.3% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.1x | 24.5x | 14.3x | 12.6x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $71M | $218M | $152M | $485M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $107M | $398M | $370M | $882M |
EXFY vs APPF vs PCTY vs PAYC vs HUBS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expensify, Inc. (EXFY) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 138.3 | +38.3% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Paycom Software, In… (PAYC) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXFY vs APPF vs PCTY vs PAYC vs HUBS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EXFY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.30x
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs HUBS's 359.7%
- 19.7% revenue growth vs EXFY's 2.1%
- -22.8% vs HUBS's -70.1%
PCTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.39
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 0.39 vs HUBS's 1.01, lower leverage
PAYC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.47 vs PCTY's 0.51
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 15.2x)
- 22.4% margin vs EXFY's -14.7%
- 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, HUBS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs EXFY's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.4% margin vs EXFY's -14.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs HUBS's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.8% vs HUBS's -70.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs EXFY's -11.0%, ROIC 22.4% vs -16.8% |
EXFY vs APPF vs PCTY vs PAYC vs HUBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EXFY vs APPF vs PCTY vs PAYC vs HUBS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUBS leads in 1 of 6 categories
EXFY leads 1 • PAYC leads 1 • APPF leads 1 • PCTY leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 23.6x EXFY's $140M. PAYC is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXFY's -14.7%. On growth, HUBS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $995M | $1.7B | $2.1B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $192M | $394M | $780M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $152M | $258M | $470M | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $234M | $470M | $443M | $712M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +63.2% | +69.3% | +79.7% | +83.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | +17.1% | +21.3% | +28.3% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.7% | +15.3% | +14.9% | +22.4% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +23.5% | +27.2% | +21.1% | +21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.8% | +20.4% | +10.5% | +7.8% | +23.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.2% | +37.2% | +26.7% | +22.6% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
EXFY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.9x trailing earnings, PAYC trades at a 93% valuation discount to HUBS's 229.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAYC offers better value at 0.63x vs PCTY's 0.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $91M | $6.0B | $6.0B | $7.5B | $10.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $6.0B | $5.9B | $7.3B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.46x | 42.94x | 27.61x | 16.94x | 229.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.08x | 24.48x | 14.29x | 12.56x | 15.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.98x | 0.63x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.95x | 14.51x | 9.75x | 55.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 6.31x | 3.78x | 3.64x | 3.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 11.15x | 5.09x | 4.43x | 5.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.53x | 25.09x | 17.61x | 18.31x | 14.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-15 for EXFY. EXFY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs EXFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.3% | +30.9% | +22.4% | +31.0% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.0% | +24.2% | +4.9% | +9.1% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.8% | +22.4% | +26.2% | +30.7% | +0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.1% | +25.9% | +23.3% | +27.1% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.13x | 0.18x | 0.09x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | -$36M | -$180M | -$218M | -$397M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $107M | $398M | $370M | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $71M | $218M | $152M | $485M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 23.29x | 95.85x | 6749.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $250 for EXFY. Over the past 12 months, APPF leads with a -22.8% total return vs HUBS's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 6.5% vs EXFY's -48.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.3% | -27.7% | -23.8% | -9.9% | -48.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.5% | -22.8% | -42.7% | -44.5% | -70.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.2% | +20.9% | -36.1% | -48.3% | -55.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +30.8% | -31.8% | -55.3% | -59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +1248.9% | +223.7% | +267.8% | +359.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -48.3% | +6.5% | -13.8% | -19.8% | -23.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PCTY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUBS's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCTY currently trades 54.9% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.64x | 0.39x | 0.49x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.06 | $326.04 | $201.97 | $267.76 | $682.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.69 | $142.72 | $92.99 | $104.90 | $180.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.5% | +51.1% | +54.9% | +51.1% | +28.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 56.2 | 55.2 | 63.4 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 874K | 346K | 736K | 1.4M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EXFY as "Buy", APPF as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", PAYC as "Hold", HUBS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1241.5% upside for EXFY (target: $14) vs 10.9% for PAYC (target: $152). PAYC is the only dividend payer here at 1.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.75 | $236.67 | $147.73 | $151.75 | $306.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 13 | 41 | 36 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.51 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.0% | +3.2% | +2.5% | +4.4% | +4.9% |
HUBS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). EXFY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
EXFY vs APPF vs PCTY vs PAYC vs HUBS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expensify, Inc. (EXFY) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS?
On trailing P/E, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the cheapest at 16. 9x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 229. 5x. On forward P/E, Paycom Software, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paycom Software, Inc. wins at 0. 47x versus Paylocity Holding Corporation's 0. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 8%, compared to -97. 5% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1249% versus EXFY's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus HubSpot, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning HUBS is approximately 158% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expensify, Inc. (EXFY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 23% for HubSpot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 2. 1% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -91. 7% for Expensify, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS?
Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -15. 1% for Expensify, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYC leads at 27. 6% versus -12. 7% for EXFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Paylocity Holding Corporation's 0. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for AppFolio, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXFY: 1241. 5% to $13. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS?
In this comparison, PAYC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. EXFY, APPF, PCTY, HUBS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EXFY or APPF or PCTY or PAYC or HUBS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), +1249% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1249%, EXFY: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EXFY and APPF and PCTY and PAYC and HUBS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EXFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAYC pays a dividend while EXFY, APPF, PCTY, HUBS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.