Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FBYD vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
FBYD vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $159M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $95.62B | $67.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $125.28B | $37.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $18.60B | $-2.15B |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 61.7% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | -164.9% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 15.3% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 24.5x | 16.5x | 7.2x | 93.5x |
| Total Debt | $41M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $110.44B | $32.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $825K | $9.03B | $5.70B | $9.48B | $4.57B |
FBYD vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Falcon's Beyond Glo… (FBYD) | 100 | 88.3 | -11.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 132.4 | +32.4% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 61.5 | -38.5% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 272.7 | +172.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBYD vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBYD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 15.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs FBYD's -63.0%
- 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 151.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.38 vs NFLX's 0.74
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 93.5x)
WBD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs FBYD's -63.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 93.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5% |
FBYD vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBYD vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • FBYD leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 12951.2x FBYD's $10M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, FBYD holds the edge at +95.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $125.3B | $37.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $30.1B | $20.5B | $35.4B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $11.0B | $11.2B | $18.6B | -$2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $18.1B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +61.7% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -164.9% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +15.3% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +14.8% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +14.5% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +5.3% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -128.3% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -32.6% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 95% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $159M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $95.6B | $68.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $199M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $196.6B | $96.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.85x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 4.87x | 93.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.52x | 16.53x | 7.20x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 12.10x | 5.33x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.55x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 0.77x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.32x | 1.72x | 0.98x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 19.11x | 4.37x | 22.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs FBYD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +41.3% | +9.8% | +19.5% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +6.9% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.5% | +29.8% | +6.9% | +8.2% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -101.8% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +8.9% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.13x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $5.4B | $39.2B | $101.0B | $28.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $825,000 | $9.0B | $5.7B | $9.5B | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $110.4B | $32.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.36x | 17.33x | 9.95x | 6.84x | 3.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,482 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs CMCSA's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -8.9% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.8% | -23.6% | +7.7% | -19.9% | +216.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +166.5% | +8.0% | -26.4% | +101.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -45.2% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +875.3% | +11.8% | +15.4% | -3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.9% | +38.6% | +2.6% | -9.7% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMCSA and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs FBYD's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.35x | 0.91x | 0.17x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.02 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $36.66 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $25.75 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.0% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +71.6% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 37.8 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 101K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 28.4M | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 10.4% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.59 | $139.50 | $31.35 | $29.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 63 | 60 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +5.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 18 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | $1.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +7.5% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FBYD vs NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 0% for Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 38x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -45. 2% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +866. 6% versus FBYD's -19. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus The Walt Disney Company's 0. 91β — meaning DIS is approximately 421% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -63. 0% for Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the more profitable company, earning 327. 0% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 327. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -235. 2% for FBYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBYD leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 0% to $115. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FBYD, NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FBYD or NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
17), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +12. 6%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBYD and NFLX and DIS and CMCSA and WBD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FBYD (Industrials) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services) and WBD (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FBYD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while FBYD, NFLX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.