Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FCRX vs BX vs KKR vs ARCC vs APO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management - Global
FCRX vs BX vs KKR vs ARCC vs APO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management - Global |
| Market Cap | $930M | $95.85B | $89.45B | $13.61B | $73.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $13.83B | $19.26B | $3.15B | $30.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $3.02B | $2.37B | $1.15B | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 86.0% | 41.8% | 75.7% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 77.7% | 51.9% | 2.4% | 69.7% | 34.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 20.5x | 16.4x | 9.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $876M | $13.31B | $54.77B | $15.99B | $13.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $2.63B | $6M | $924M | $19.24B |
FCRX vs BX vs KKR vs ARCC vs APO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crescent Capital BD… (FCRX) | 100 | 98.5 | -1.5% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 132.0 | +32.0% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 180.2 | +80.2% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
| Apollo Global Manag… (APO) | 100 | 222.9 | +122.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCRX vs BX vs KKR vs ARCC vs APO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 8.1%
- 8.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs BX's 6.3%
- +6.5% vs KKR's -13.0%
BX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
KKR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 1.71x
- Beta 0.77, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.71x
- NIM 3.6% vs KKR's 0.0%
- 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
APO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs KKR's 7.2%
- PEG 0.19 vs FCRX's 4.54
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 20.5x), PEG 0.96 vs 0.98 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs APO's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs KKR's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 8.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs BX's 6.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.5% vs KKR's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs APO's 0.5% |
FCRX vs BX vs KKR vs ARCC vs APO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FCRX vs BX vs KKR vs ARCC vs APO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
BX leads 1 • APO leads 1 • KKR leads 0 • ARCC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APO is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.3B annually — 153.5x FCRX's $197M. ARCC is the more profitable business, keeping 41.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KKR's 12.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $13.8B | $19.3B | $3.1B | $30.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $0 | $7.2B | $9.0B | $2.0B | $11.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $3.0B | $2.4B | $1.1B | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $3.5B | $7.5B | $1.1B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +86.0% | +41.8% | +75.7% | +88.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +51.9% | +2.4% | +69.7% | +34.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +21.8% | +12.3% | +41.3% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +12.6% | +49.4% | +36.3% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.7% | +41.3% | -1.7% | -63.9% | +16.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARCC and APO each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, ARCC trades at a 76% valuation discount to KKR's 42.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APO offers better value at 0.23x vs FCRX's 3.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $930M | $95.8B | $89.4B | $13.6B | $73.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $106.5B | $144.2B | $28.7B | $67.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.61x | 31.53x | 42.88x | 10.19x | 17.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.07x | 20.50x | 16.42x | 9.92x | 14.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.80x | 1.51x | — | 0.99x | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.77x | 20.24x | 13.09x | 5.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.71x | 6.93x | 4.64x | 4.33x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 4.37x | 1.17x | 0.93x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.24x | 54.93x | 9.39x | 11.92x | 9.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. APO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCRX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs APO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +14.3% | +3.2% | +8.1% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +6.5% | +0.6% | +3.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +16.1% | +0.3% | +5.7% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +16.9% | +0.1% | +7.5% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.61x | 0.67x | 1.12x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $866M | $10.7B | $54.8B | $15.1B | -$5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $2.6B | $6M | $924M | $19.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $876M | $13.3B | $54.8B | $16.0B | $13.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.34x | 14.12x | 3.29x | 2.98x | 28.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APO five years ago would be worth $23,514 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,220 for FCRX. Over the past 12 months, FCRX leads with a +6.5% total return vs KKR's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APO at 29.2% vs FCRX's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -21.3% | -22.0% | -4.9% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.5% | -6.5% | -13.0% | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.0% | +65.9% | +107.7% | +34.2% | +115.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | +59.0% | +76.5% | +47.0% | +135.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | +476.1% | +715.5% | +139.2% | +759.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | +18.4% | +27.6% | +10.3% | +29.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCRX and ARCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCRX currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs BX's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.53x | 1.70x | 0.77x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.20 | $190.09 | $153.87 | $23.42 | $157.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $101.73 | $82.67 | $17.40 | $99.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +64.3% | +65.2% | +81.0% | +81.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 54.8 | 52.4 | 56.7 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 7.1M | 6.5M | 7.5M | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
FCRX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCRX as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", APO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.5% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs 15.4% for ARCC (target: $22). For income investors, FCRX offers the higher dividend yield at 8.09% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $156.29 | $143.00 | $21.88 | $157.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 29 | 26 | 32 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.1% | +6.3% | +0.8% | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.03 | $7.70 | $0.80 | $0.38 | $2.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
FCRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). BX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FCRX vs BX vs KKR vs ARCC vs APO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO?
On trailing P/E, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 42. 9x. On forward P/E, Ares Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apollo Global Management, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. 's 4. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) delivered a total return of +135. 1%, compared to +22. 2% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +759. 2% versus FCRX's +22. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
77β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 121% more volatile than ARCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 118% for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO?
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
3% net margin versus 12. 3% for KKR & Co. Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCRX leads at 77. 7% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. 's 4. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Blackstone Inc. — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 42. 5% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. (FCRX) offers the highest yield at 8. 1%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is FCRX or BX or KKR or ARCC or APO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
77), 2. 0% yield, +139. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARCC: +139. 2%, FCRX: +22. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCRX and BX and KKR and ARCC and APO?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCRX is a small-cap deep-value stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; APO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.