Copper
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FCX vs TSLA vs MP vs ALB vs GM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Industrial Materials
Chemicals - Specialty
Auto - Manufacturers
FCX vs TSLA vs MP vs ALB vs GM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Copper | Auto - Manufacturers | Industrial Materials | Chemicals - Specialty | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $87.11B | $1.55T | $12.28B | $23.37B | $70.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.42B | $97.88B | $305M | $5.49B | $184.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.73B | $3.88B | $-71M | $-233M | $2.54B |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 19.1% | 8.3% | 18.5% | 6.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 5.0% | -36.4% | 5.6% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 22.4x | 213.0x | 274.3x | 22.4x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $11.50B | $8.38B | $1.04B | $3.30B | $130.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.35B | $16.51B | $1.17B | $1.62B | $20.95B |
FCX vs TSLA vs MP vs ALB vs GM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 523.9 | +423.9% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 572.0 | +472.0% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 693.4 | +593.4% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 256.9 | +156.9% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 309.9 | +209.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCX vs TSLA vs MP vs ALB vs GM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- PEG 0.75 vs TSLA's 5.50
- Beta 1.79, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.29x
TSLA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 28.6% 10Y total return vs MP's 5.9%
MP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
- 35.1% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4%
ALB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +256.7% vs TSLA's +49.1%
GM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 22.4x)
- Beta 1.07 vs TSLA's 2.06
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.1% revenue growth vs ALB's -4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 22.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs MP's -23.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs TSLA's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ALB's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +256.7% vs TSLA's +49.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs MP's -2.0%, ROIC 12.8% vs -4.7% |
FCX vs TSLA vs MP vs ALB vs GM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FCX vs TSLA vs MP vs ALB vs GM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCX leads in 2 of 6 categories
GM leads 1 • MP leads 1 • TSLA leads 0 • ALB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GM is the larger business by revenue, generating $184.6B annually — 604.7x MP's $305M. FCX is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MP's -23.3%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.4B | $97.9B | $305M | $5.5B | $184.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.6B | $9.5B | -$43M | $802M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $3.9B | -$71M | -$233M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.2B | $7.0B | -$314M | $577M | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +19.1% | +8.3% | +18.5% | +6.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +5.0% | -36.4% | +5.6% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +4.0% | -23.3% | -4.2% | +1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +7.2% | -102.8% | +10.5% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +15.8% | +49.1% | +32.7% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +154.2% | +11.9% | +121.4% | — | -15.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.0x trailing earnings, GM trades at a 94% valuation discount to TSLA's 381.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs TSLA's 9.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $87.1B | $1.55T | $12.3B | $23.4B | $70.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $95.3B | $1.54T | $12.2B | $25.1B | $180.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.88x | 381.31x | -138.26x | -34.50x | 23.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.41x | 212.96x | 274.33x | 22.36x | 6.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.33x | 9.84x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.16x | 146.35x | — | 33.21x | 10.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.38x | 16.30x | 44.59x | 4.55x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.84x | 17.53x | 4.92x | 2.39x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.05x | 248.44x | — | 33.76x | 6.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCX delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MP. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GM's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs MP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +4.8% | -3.7% | -2.3% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +2.9% | -2.0% | -1.4% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +4.5% | -4.7% | +0.6% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +4.4% | -4.2% | +0.6% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.10x | 0.44x | 0.34x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.1B | -$8.1B | -$123M | $1.7B | $109.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.4B | $16.5B | $1.2B | $1.6B | $20.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.5B | $8.4B | $1.0B | $3.3B | $130.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.68x | 17.04x | -2.80x | 1.59x | 2.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MP five years ago would be worth $24,966 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,680 for ALB. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs TSLA's +49.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MP at 47.6% vs ALB's 3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | -6.0% | +25.8% | +38.1% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.3% | +49.1% | +192.7% | +256.7% | +73.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.7% | +139.7% | +221.7% | +9.3% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +83.7% | +149.7% | +26.8% | +35.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +507.7% | +2856.3% | +591.3% | +217.0% | +180.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | +33.8% | +47.6% | +3.0% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALB and GM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GM is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSLA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs MP's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 2.06x | 1.40x | 1.60x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.97 | $498.83 | $100.25 | $221.00 | $87.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.15 | $271.00 | $18.64 | $53.70 | $44.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +82.6% | +69.0% | +89.8% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 59.3 | 66.8 | 53.0 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.4M | 61.6M | 5.6M | 2.0M | 6.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCX and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCX as "Buy", TSLA as "Hold", MP as "Buy", ALB as "Hold", GM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.0% upside for GM (target: $92) vs -3.8% for ALB (target: $191). For income investors, FCX offers the higher dividend yield at 0.99% vs ALB's 0.82%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $450.45 | $78.25 | $190.80 | $91.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 81 | 11 | 45 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | — | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — | — | 15 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | — | $1.62 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.5% |
FCX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FCX vs TSLA vs MP vs ALB vs GM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM?
On trailing P/E, General Motors Company (GM) is the cheapest at 24.
0x versus Tesla, Inc. at 381. 3x. On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Tesla, Inc. 's 5. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM?
Over the past 5 years, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) delivered a total return of +149. 7%, compared to +26. 8% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus GM's +180. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Motors Company (GM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Tesla, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning TSLA is approximately 92% more volatile than GM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for General Motors Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -4. 4% for Albemarle Corporation (ALB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -48. 7% for General Motors Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, GM leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM?
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(FCX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -31. 2% for MP Materials Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCX leads at 24. 4% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCX leads at 27. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Tesla, Inc. 's 5. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 268. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GM: 17. 0% to $91. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM?
In this comparison, FCX (1.
0% yield), GM (0. 9% yield), ALB (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TSLA, MP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FCX or TSLA or MP or ALB or GM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 0. 9% yield, +180. 2% 10Y return). Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +180. 2%, TSLA: +28. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCX and TSLA and MP and ALB and GM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FCX (Basic Materials) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical) and MP (Basic Materials) and ALB (Basic Materials) and GM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. FCX, ALB, GM pay a dividend while TSLA, MP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.