Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FDBC vs CZWI vs NFBK vs PBFS vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FDBC vs CZWI vs NFBK vs PBFS vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $271M | $203M | $588M | $373M | $253M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $90M | $251M | $88M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $14M | $39M | $20M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 65.5% | 54.7% | 49.1% | 100.0% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 7.0% | 16.1% | 37.3% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 11.8x | 10.4x | 19.6x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $52M | $760M | $0.00 | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $119M | $168M | $119M | $161M |
FDBC vs CZWI vs NFBK vs PBFS vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity D & D Banc… (FDBC) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDBC vs CZWI vs NFBK vs PBFS vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 7.87
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs NFBK's 1.00, lower leverage
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 3.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- 3.7% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6%
PBFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.67 vs FXNC's 7.87
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- NIM 3.6% vs NFBK's 2.0%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 7.87 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NFBK's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs FDBC's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% |
FDBC vs CZWI vs NFBK vs PBFS vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDBC vs CZWI vs NFBK vs PBFS vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FDBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PBFS leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • NFBK leads 0 • FXNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $251M annually — 2.9x PBFS's $88M. PBFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFBK's 11.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $90M | $251M | $88M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $9M | $61M | $28M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $14M | $39M | $20M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $11M | $42M | $9M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.5% | +54.7% | +49.1% | +100.0% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +7.0% | +16.1% | +37.3% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +16.0% | +11.9% | +21.8% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +11.5% | +11.9% | +36.5% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +63.0% | +68.8% | +15.4% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FDBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FDBC trades at a 52% valuation discount to PBFS's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PBFS offers better value at 0.67x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $203M | $588M | $373M | $253M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $136M | $1.2B | $254M | $134M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.45x | 14.44x | 19.54x | 19.59x | 14.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.78x | 10.42x | — | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 2.85x | — | 0.67x | 9.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.62x | 15.28x | 24.19x | 7.73x | 6.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 2.25x | 2.34x | 4.24x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.09x | 0.83x | 1.19x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.92x | 19.55x | 19.64x | 11.60x | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $5 for NFBK. FDBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDBC scores 8/9 vs PBFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +7.8% | +5.5% | +6.4% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +2.0% | +2.0% | +8.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +0.6% | +2.5% | +9.7% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.28x | 1.08x | — | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$131M | -$67M | $592M | -$119M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $119M | $168M | $119M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $52M | $760M | $0 | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 0.16x | 0.46x | 0.87x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,458 for FDBC. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs FDBC's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FDBC's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +21.5% | +26.5% | +11.9% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +45.6% | +31.5% | +30.6% | +46.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +160.0% | +65.7% | +72.9% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +71.2% | +0.2% | +25.2% | +68.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.2% | +157.0% | +20.6% | +0.9% | +241.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +37.5% | +18.3% | +20.0% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFBK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FDBC's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.46x | 1.00x | 0.52x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.00 | $22.62 | $14.21 | $15.18 | $29.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.00 | $12.83 | $9.90 | $11.09 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +93.2% | +99.0% | +98.1% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 63.7 | 57.0 | 60.1 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 40K | 258K | 13K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", NFBK as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.1% upside for NFBK (target: $15) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.50 | — | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 9 | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +1.8% | +3.7% | — | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 | 10 | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $0.37 | $0.52 | — | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.1% | +3.2% | +1.7% | +0.1% |
FDBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PBFS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FDBC vs CZWI vs NFBK vs PBFS vs FXNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 2. 32x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -5. 4% for Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus PBFS's +0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning NFBK is approximately 117% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC?
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 11. 9% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 32x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFBK: 3. 1% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC?
In this comparison, NFBK (3.
7% yield), FDBC (3. 5% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PBFS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDBC or CZWI or NFBK or PBFS or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, PBFS: +0. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDBC and CZWI and NFBK and PBFS and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. FDBC, CZWI, NFBK, FXNC pay a dividend while PBFS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.