Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FDBC vs NFBK vs NBTB vs KRNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FDBC vs NFBK vs NBTB vs KRNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $271M | $588M | $2.35B | $508M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $251M | $867M | $344M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $39M | $169M | $32M |
| Gross Margin | 65.5% | 49.1% | 72.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 16.1% | 25.3% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 10.4x | 10.8x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $760M | $327M | $1.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $168M | $185M | $167M |
FDBC vs NFBK vs NBTB vs KRNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity D & D Banc… (FDBC) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDBC vs NFBK vs NBTB vs KRNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDBC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 35.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 7.1%, current ratio 33600.30x
- PEG 0.81 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.4x)
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs FDBC's 179.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs KRNY's 1.7%
KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.83 vs NFBK's 1.00
- 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs NFBK's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.9% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FDBC vs NFBK vs NBTB vs KRNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDBC vs NFBK vs NBTB vs KRNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FDBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • NFBK leads 1 • KRNY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 6.2x FDBC's $140M. FDBC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 7.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $251M | $867M | $344M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $61M | $241M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $39M | $169M | $32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $42M | $225M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.5% | +49.1% | +72.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +16.1% | +25.3% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +11.9% | +19.5% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +11.9% | +25.2% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +68.8% | +39.5% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FDBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FDBC trades at a 52% valuation discount to NFBK's 19.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FDBC offers better value at 0.81x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $588M | $2.4B | $508M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $1.2B | $2.5B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.45x | 19.54x | 13.53x | 19.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.42x | 10.80x | 12.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | — | 1.92x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.62x | 24.19x | 10.35x | 44.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 2.34x | 2.71x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 0.83x | 1.21x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.92x | 19.64x | 10.75x | 23.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. FDBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDBC scores 8/9 vs KRNY's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +5.5% | +9.5% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.5% | +2.4% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 1.08x | 0.17x | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$131M | $592M | $142M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $168M | $185M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $760M | $327M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 0.46x | 1.05x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +37.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFBK at 18.3% vs FDBC's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +26.5% | +9.3% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +31.5% | +9.0% | +37.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +65.7% | +54.1% | +32.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +0.2% | +29.9% | -20.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.2% | +20.6% | +102.2% | -9.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +18.3% | +15.5% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFBK and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFBK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FDBC's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.00x | 0.89x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.00 | $14.21 | $46.92 | $8.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.00 | $9.90 | $39.20 | $5.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +99.0% | +96.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 57.0 | 57.3 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 258K | 236K | 298K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFBK as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs NBTB's 3.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.50 | $46.00 | $9.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 10 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +3.7% | +3.2% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $0.52 | $1.43 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.2% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
FDBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FDBC vs NFBK vs NBTB vs KRNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY?
On trailing P/E, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FDBC returned +179. 2% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning NFBK is approximately 19% more volatile than KRNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY?
Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 3. 2% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB).
09Is FDBC or NFBK or NBTB or KRNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, NFBK: +20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDBC and NFBK and NBTB and KRNY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.