Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FDBC vs PBFS vs CZWI vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FDBC vs PBFS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $271M | $373M | $203M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $88M | $90M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $20M | $14M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 65.5% | 100.0% | 54.7% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 37.3% | 7.0% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 19.6x | 11.8x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $0.00 | $52M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $119M | $119M | $185M |
FDBC vs PBFS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity D & D Banc… (FDBC) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDBC vs PBFS vs CZWI vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 35.6%
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.5%, current ratio 33600.30x
- 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.53
PBFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.67 vs CZWI's 2.32
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs FDBC's 179.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FDBC's 0.95
- +45.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs FDBC's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FDBC's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6% |
FDBC vs PBFS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDBC vs PBFS vs CZWI vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FDBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PBFS leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.8x PBFS's $88M. PBFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $88M | $90M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $28M | $9M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $20M | $14M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $9M | $11M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.5% | +100.0% | +54.7% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +37.3% | +7.0% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +21.8% | +16.0% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +36.5% | +11.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +15.4% | +63.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FDBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FDBC trades at a 52% valuation discount to PBFS's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PBFS offers better value at 0.67x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $373M | $203M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $254M | $136M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.45x | 19.59x | 14.44x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.78x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 0.67x | 2.85x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.62x | 7.73x | 15.28x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 4.24x | 2.25x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.19x | 1.09x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.92x | 11.60x | 19.55x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for PBFS. FDBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDBC scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +6.4% | +7.8% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +8.1% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +9.7% | +0.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | — | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$131M | -$119M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $119M | $119M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $0 | $52M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 0.87x | 0.16x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,458 for FDBC. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FDBC's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +11.9% | +21.5% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +30.6% | +45.6% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +72.9% | +160.0% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +25.2% | +71.2% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.2% | +0.9% | +157.0% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +20.0% | +37.5% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBFS and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FDBC's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PBFS currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs FDBC's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.52x | 0.46x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.00 | $15.18 | $22.62 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.00 | $11.09 | $12.83 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +98.1% | +93.2% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 60.1 | 63.7 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 13K | 40K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FDBC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". For income investors, FDBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | — | +1.8% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | — | $0.37 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.7% | +3.1% | +0.4% |
FDBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PBFS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FDBC vs PBFS vs CZWI vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -5. 4% for Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FDBC returned +179. 2% versus PBFS's +0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FDBC is approximately 107% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 35. 6% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB?
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB?
In this comparison, FDBC (3.
5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PBFS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDBC or PBFS or CZWI or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, PBFS: +0. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDBC and PBFS and CZWI and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FDBC, CZWI, NBTB pay a dividend while PBFS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.