Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FDMT vs RCKT vs CRSP vs KRYS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FDMT
4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$519M
5Y Perf.-76.0%
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.-93.3%
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$5.06B
5Y Perf.-65.8%
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.75B
5Y Perf.+394.5%

FDMT vs RCKT vs CRSP vs KRYS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FDMT logoFDMT
RCKT logoRCKT
CRSP logoCRSP
KRYS logoKRYS
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$519M$398M$5.06B$8.75B
Revenue (TTM)$85M$0.00$4M$417M
Net Income (TTM)$-161M$-223M$-569M$225M
Gross Margin-14.1%-41.7%92.8%
Operating Margin-210.7%-134.1%42.8%
Forward P/E39.3x
Total Debt$21M$25M$395M$9M
Cash & Equiv.$60M$78M$355M$496M

FDMT vs RCKT vs CRSP vs KRYSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FDMT
RCKT
CRSP
KRYS
StockDec 20May 26Return
4D Molecular Therap… (FDMT)10024.0-76.0%
Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT)1006.7-93.3%
CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP)10034.2-65.8%
Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS)100494.5+394.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FDMT vs RCKT vs CRSP vs KRYS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FDMT
4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

FDMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 2.3K%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 200.9%
  • 2.3K% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
  • +218.3% vs RCKT's -45.2%
Best for: growth exposure
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

RCKT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG
The Secondary Option

CRSP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
The Income Pick

KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.12
  • 26.9% 10Y total return vs CRSP's 272.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 9.95x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFDMT logoFDMT2.3K% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
Quality / MarginsKRYS logoKRYS53.9% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
Stability / SafetyKRYS logoKRYSBeta 1.12 vs CRSP's 1.93, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FDMT logoFDMT+218.3% vs RCKT's -45.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KRYS logoKRYS17.6% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC 18.0% vs -63.2%

FDMT vs RCKT vs CRSP vs KRYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FDMT4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration And License Revenue
100.0%$85M
RCKTRocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRSPCRISPR Therapeutics AG
FY 2025
Grant
100.0%$4M
KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FDMT vs RCKT vs CRSP vs KRYS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKRYSLAGGINGCRSP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

KRYS and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $417M and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFDMT logoFDMT4D Molecular Ther…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$85M$0$4M$417M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$181M-$232M-$535M$185M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$161M-$223M-$569M$225M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$130M-$190M-$401M$237M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-14.1%-41.7%+92.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.1%-134.1%+42.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-188.9%-138.6%+53.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-152.7%-97.8%+56.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+68.6%+31.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-17.4%+38.7%+19.0%+52.5%
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FDMT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricFDMT logoFDMT4D Molecular Ther…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …
Market CapShares × price$519M$398M$5.1B$8.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$480M$345M$5.1B$8.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.10x-1.83x-8.10x43.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.39.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple49.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.09x1440.41x22.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.14x1.47x2.45x7.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF46.30x
FDMT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KRYS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

KRYS delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-80 for RCKT. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRSP's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRYS scores 5/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFDMT logoFDMT4D Molecular Ther…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-36.8%-80.5%-30.9%+19.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.5%-67.5%-24.5%+17.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-28.1%-63.2%-22.3%+18.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-30.3%-58.9%-26.6%+14.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94115
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.09x0.21x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$39M-$53M$40M-$487M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$60M$78M$355M$496M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$21M$25M$395M$9M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense
KRYS leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $41,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, FDMT leads with a +218.3% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 50.1% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFDMT logoFDMT4D Molecular Ther…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+35.7%+6.1%-2.5%+20.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+218.3%-45.2%+53.1%+116.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.9%-82.8%-6.3%+238.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.7%-91.6%-51.3%+319.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.5%-91.3%+272.0%+2688.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-15.6%-44.4%-2.2%+50.1%
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KRYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KRYS is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRSP's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFDMT logoFDMT4D Molecular Ther…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.47x1.31x1.93x1.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.34$7.39$78.48$303.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.00$2.19$33.50$122.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.5%+49.7%+66.8%+97.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.054.455.564.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded737K3.5M2.0M264K
KRYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FDMT as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 232.3% upside for FDMT (target: $33) vs 12.2% for KRYS (target: $333).

MetricFDMT logoFDMT4D Molecular Ther…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.00$5.00$63.00$332.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts14193817
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KRYS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FDMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallKrystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FDMT vs RCKT vs CRSP vs KRYS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.

(FDMT) is the stronger pick with 2302% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (39. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. (FDMT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS?

Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) delivered a total return of +319. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus RCKT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus CRISPR Therapeutics AG's 1. 93β — meaning CRSP is approximately 71% more volatile than KRYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 21% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc.

(FDMT) is pulling ahead at 2302% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, FDMT leads at 200. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS?

Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FDMT: 232.

3% to $33. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is FDMT or RCKT or CRSP or KRYS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRYS: +26. 9%, CRSP: +272. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FDMT and RCKT and CRSP and KRYS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FDMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FDMT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCKT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRSP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRYS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 32%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.