Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FFAI vs NIO vs LI vs LCID

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
NIO
NIO Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.-72.3%
LI
Li Auto Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$35.34B
5Y Perf.+1.2%
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.-93.8%

FFAI vs NIO vs LI vs LCID — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FFAI logoFFAI
NIO logoNIO
LI logoLI
LCID logoLCID
IndustryAuto - ManufacturersAuto - ManufacturersAuto - ManufacturersAuto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$7M$12.28B$35.34B$2.00B
Revenue (TTM)$642K$69.42B$125.72B$1.12B
Net Income (TTM)$-478M$-24.31B$4.51B$-3.36B
Gross Margin-160.2%10.3%19.4%-145.0%
Operating Margin-512.6%-32.6%2.3%-339.6%
Forward P/E11.3x
Total Debt$99M$33.82B$16.34B$861M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$19.33B$65.90B$998M

FFAI vs NIO vs LI vs LCIDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FFAI
NIO
LI
LCID
StockSep 20May 26Return
Faraday Future Inte… (FFAI)1000.0-100.0%
NIO Inc. (NIO)10027.7-72.3%
Li Auto Inc. (LI)100101.2+1.2%
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID)1006.2-93.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FFAI vs NIO vs LI vs LCID

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LI leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. NIO Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LCID also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.
The Secondary Option

FFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
NIO
NIO Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +52.9% vs LCID's -73.1%
Best for: momentum
LI
Li Auto Inc.
The Income Pick

LI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.94
  • 6.9% 10Y total return vs NIO's -11.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 1.82x
  • Beta 0.94, current ratio 1.82x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

LCID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.6%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
  • 67.6% revenue growth vs FFAI's -31.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLCID logoLCID67.6% revenue growth vs FFAI's -31.3%
Quality / MarginsLI logoLI3.6% margin vs FFAI's -745.2%
Stability / SafetyLI logoLIBeta 0.94 vs FFAI's 2.08, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NIO logoNIO+52.9% vs LCID's -73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)LI logoLI2.8% ROA vs FFAI's -151.6%, ROIC 209.3% vs -39.0%

FFAI vs NIO vs LI vs LCID — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.
FY 2023
Automobiles
100.0%$800,000
NIONIO Inc.
FY 2024
Vehicle sales
88.6%$58.2B
Service
5.1%$3.3B
Sales of packages
3.2%$2.1B
Others
3.2%$2.1B
LILi Auto Inc.
FY 2024
Vehicle sales
95.9%$138.5B
Other Sales And Services
4.1%$5.9B
LCIDLucid Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Regulatory Credits
100.0%$96M

FFAI vs NIO vs LI vs LCID — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLILAGGINGLCID

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LI is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.7B annually — 195828.6x FFAI's $642,000. LI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFAI's -745.2%. On growth, FFAI holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…NIO logoNIONIO Inc.LI logoLILi Auto Inc.LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$642,000$69.4B$125.7B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$253M-$23.0B$5.4B-$3.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$478M-$24.3B$4.5B-$3.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$111M-$16.5B-$7.7B-$4.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-160.2%+10.3%+19.4%-145.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-512.6%-32.6%+2.3%-3.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-745.2%-35.0%+3.6%-3.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-172.9%-23.8%-6.1%-4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.1%+9.0%-36.5%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.5%+7.6%-123.3%-44.2%
LI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NIO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…NIO logoNIONIO Inc.LI logoLILi Auto Inc.LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$7M$12.3B$35.3B$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$99M$14.4B$28.1B$1.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.02x-3.62x15.89x-0.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue12.88x1.27x1.66x1.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x6.08x1.79x2.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.32x
NIO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

LI delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NIO. LI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NIO's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LI scores 5/9 vs LCID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…NIO logoNIONIO Inc.LI logoLILi Auto Inc.LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.1%-2.7%+6.2%-193.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-151.6%-23.7%+2.8%-40.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.0%-55.2%+2.1%-98.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-55.5%-41.7%+7.8%-49.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94353
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.86x2.50x0.23x1.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$92M$14.5B-$49.6B-$137M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$19.3B$65.9B$998M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$99M$33.8B$16.3B$861M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.15x-25.29x28.54x-146.67x
LI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LI five years ago would be worth $9,639 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FFAI. Over the past 12 months, NIO leads with a +52.9% total return vs LCID's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LI at -10.7% vs FFAI's -94.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…NIO logoNIONIO Inc.LI logoLILi Auto Inc.LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-65.0%+14.2%+2.0%-45.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-67.1%+52.9%-33.1%-73.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-29.0%-28.9%-92.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-84.1%-3.6%-96.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-11.1%+6.9%-93.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-94.7%-10.8%-10.7%-57.2%
LI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NIO and LI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFAI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NIO currently trades 73.2% from its 52-week high vs FFAI's 10.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…NIO logoNIONIO Inc.LI logoLILi Auto Inc.LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.08x1.29x0.94x2.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.61$8.02$32.03$33.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.21$3.34$15.71$5.62
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+10.4%+73.2%+54.9%+18.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.544.344.634.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded39.5M39.7M3.0M12.9M
Evenly matched — NIO and LI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FFAI as "Hold", NIO as "Buy", LI as "Buy", LCID as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for LCID (target: $14) vs 9.9% for NIO (target: $6).

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…NIO logoNIONIO Inc.LI logoLILi Auto Inc.LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.45$20.01$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2241615
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

LI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NIO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallLi Auto Inc. (LI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FFAI vs NIO vs LI vs LCID: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is the stronger pick with 67. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 3% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI). Li Auto Inc. (LI) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NIO Inc. (NIO) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID?

Over the past 5 years, Li Auto Inc.

(LI) delivered a total return of -3. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LI returned +6. 9% versus FFAI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Li Auto Inc.

(LI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning FFAI is approximately 120% more volatile than LI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Li Auto Inc. (LI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for NIO Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is pulling ahead at 67. 6% versus -31. 3% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. grew EPS 98. 9% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Li Auto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LI leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID?

Li Auto Inc.

(LI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -660. 2% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LI leads at 4. 4% versus -277. 8% for FFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LI leads at 20. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCID: 131.

4% to $14. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is FFAI or NIO or LI or LCID better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Li Auto Inc.

(LI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94)). Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LI: +6. 9%, FFAI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FFAI and NIO and LI and LCID?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NIO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FFAI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 155%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NIO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LCID

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FFAI and NIO and LI and LCID on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FFAI: 311.1% · NIO: 9.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.