Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FGEN vs INSM vs RARE vs PTCT vs BMRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
FGEN vs INSM vs RARE vs PTCT vs BMRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $585M | $22.62B | $2.57B | $5.35B | $10.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-118M | $606M | $669M | $827M | $3.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $216M | $-1.28B | $-609M | $-187M | $269M |
| Gross Margin | 47.5% | 79.4% | 83.6% | 49.7% | 75.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | -194.0% | -83.9% | -8.3% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 8.3x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $90M | $768M | $1.28B | $492M | $643M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $510M | $434M | $985M | $1.31B |
FGEN vs INSM vs RARE vs PTCT vs BMRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 645.8 | +545.8% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 35.2 | -64.8% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 100 | 53.1 | -46.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGEN vs INSM vs RARE vs PTCT vs BMRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 0.3%
- 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 157.4% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%
INSM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs PTCT's 7.3%
- Beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.54 vs FGEN's 1.58
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PTCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs FGEN's -36.7%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 12.6x)
- +58.2% vs RARE's -21.8%
BMRN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 5.21x
- 8.3% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs FGEN's -36.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs INSM's -210.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs FGEN's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.2% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 157.4% ROA vs INSM's -57.3% |
FGEN vs INSM vs RARE vs PTCT vs BMRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FGEN vs INSM vs RARE vs PTCT vs BMRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMRN leads in 2 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 1 • INSM leads 1 • FGEN leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMRN and FGEN operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and -$118M in trailing revenue. BMRN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$118M | $606M | $669M | $827M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$123M | -$1.2B | -$536M | -$37M | $521M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $216M | -$1.3B | -$609M | -$187M | $269M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$998M | -$487M | -$229M | $767M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +79.4% | +83.6% | +49.7% | +75.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -194.0% | -83.9% | -8.3% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -160.6% | -2.1% | -91.0% | -22.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | -164.5% | -72.8% | -27.7% | +23.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.7% | +152.6% | -2.4% | -76.8% | +2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | -16.7% | -17.2% | -100.3% | -43.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 72% valuation discount to BMRN's 30.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BMRN's 15.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $585M | $22.6B | $2.6B | $5.3B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $625M | $22.9B | $3.4B | $4.9B | $9.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.63x | -16.35x | -4.48x | 8.29x | 30.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 12.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 5.42x | 15.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.75x | 37.30x | 3.82x | 3.09x | 3.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 30.30x | — | — | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 7.61x | 14.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMRN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGEN delivers a 12.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. BMRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSM's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs FGEN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | -168.4% | -6.1% | — | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +157.4% | -57.3% | -45.8% | -6.8% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -86.5% | -89.4% | — | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -104.8% | -66.8% | -46.4% | +55.9% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.04x | — | — | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $258M | $842M | -$492M | -$669M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $510M | $434M | $985M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $90M | $768M | $1.3B | $492M | $643M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.28x | -14.23x | -14.49x | -1.67x | 16.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $148 for FGEN. Over the past 12 months, PTCT leads with a +58.2% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSM at 77.0% vs FGEN's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.1% | -40.8% | +10.7% | -16.0% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.0% | +53.5% | -21.8% | +58.2% | -8.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +454.5% | -44.5% | +16.1% | -43.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +221.7% | -77.2% | +60.3% | -30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +793.5% | -59.4% | +733.2% | -35.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.3% | +77.0% | -17.8% | +5.1% | -17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSM and BMRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FGEN's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMRN currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 0.54x | 1.42x | 1.13x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.60 | $212.75 | $42.37 | $87.50 | $66.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.85 | $63.81 | $18.29 | $37.94 | $50.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.5% | +49.3% | +61.7% | +73.7% | +81.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.4 | 41.9 | 66.6 | 45.3 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 2.3M | 1.8M | 1.0M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FGEN as "Hold", INSM as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 273.3% upside for FGEN (target: $28) vs 39.0% for PTCT (target: $90). FGEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $217.11 | $51.50 | $89.67 | $89.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 35 | 33 | 26 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BMRN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FGEN vs INSM vs RARE vs PTCT vs BMRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 7% for FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insmed Incorporated (INSM) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. at 30. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -98. 5% for FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus FGEN's -98. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus FibroGen, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning FGEN is approximately 194% more volatile than INSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 104% for Insmed Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -36. 7% for FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -18. 6% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -507. 8% for FGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FGEN: 273.
3% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN?
In this comparison, FGEN (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. INSM, RARE, PTCT, BMRN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FGEN or INSM or RARE or PTCT or BMRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +793. 5% 10Y return). FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +793. 5%, FGEN: -98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGEN and INSM and RARE and PTCT and BMRN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.