Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FGI vs LESL vs FLXS vs MAS vs HD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Construction
Home Improvement
FGI vs LESL vs FLXS vs MAS vs HD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Home Improvement | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Construction | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $65M | $13M | $295M | $14.51B | $320.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $1.21B | $458M | $7.68B | $164.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-275M | $22M | $837M | $14.16B |
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | 34.5% | 23.2% | 35.4% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | -0.2% | 6.1% | 16.8% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.9x | 16.9x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $1.01B | $59M | $3.44B | $19.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $64M | $40M | $647M | $1.39B |
FGI vs LESL vs FLXS vs MAS vs HD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGI Industries Ltd. (FGI) | 100 | 27.9 | -72.1% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 221.4 | +121.4% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGI vs LESL vs FLXS vs MAS vs HD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 12.4% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6%
- +129.8% vs LESL's -89.7%
Among these 5 stocks, LESL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 2.78x
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 21.5x)
MAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 3.40 vs HD's 6.01
- 10.9% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
- 15.9% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs 1.6%
HD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 2.8%
- 184.0% 10Y total return vs MAS's 152.1%
- Beta 0.84, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.06x
- Beta 0.84 vs LESL's 2.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs LESL's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs MAS's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.8% vs LESL's -89.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs 1.6% |
FGI vs LESL vs FLXS vs MAS vs HD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FGI vs LESL vs FLXS vs MAS vs HD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAS leads 1 • HD leads 1 • FGI leads 0 • LESL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 1214.0x FGI's $136M. MAS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $1.2B | $458M | $7.7B | $164.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $183,538 | $6M | $31M | $1.4B | $24.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$275M | $22M | $837M | $14.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $8M | $28M | $943M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +34.5% | +23.2% | +35.4% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -0.2% | +6.1% | +16.8% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -22.7% | +4.8% | +10.9% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +0.6% | +6.1% | +12.3% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -16.0% | +9.8% | +6.5% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | -85.8% | -27.2% | +20.7% | -14.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 31% valuation discount to HD's 22.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MAS offers better value at 3.76x vs HD's 6.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $65M | $13M | $295M | $14.5B | $320.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $88M | $961M | $314M | $17.3B | $338.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.15x | -0.06x | 15.54x | 18.63x | 22.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.90x | 16.85x | 21.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.76x | 6.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 81.73x | 20.25x | 10.38x | 12.18x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.01x | 0.67x | 1.92x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.01x | — | 1.87x | 201.40x | 25.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.74x | 16.76x | 25.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FLXS and MAS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-19 for FGI. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs FGI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.3% | — | +12.2% | +8.0% | +110.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -42.4% | +7.5% | +15.9% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +1.6% | +9.9% | +35.4% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +35.9% | +29.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | — | 0.35x | 45.81x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $948M | $19M | $2.8B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $64M | $40M | $647M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $1.0B | $59M | $3.4B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.14x | -3.06x | 380.21x | 12.60x | 8.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, FGI leads with a +129.8% total return vs LESL's -89.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs LESL's -81.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.7% | -17.3% | +38.7% | +12.1% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +129.8% | -89.7% | +80.1% | +21.1% | -8.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -99.3% | +242.4% | +40.1% | +21.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.2% | -99.7% | +19.5% | +16.1% | +7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.2% | -99.7% | +51.4% | +152.1% | +184.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | -81.3% | +50.7% | +11.9% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLXS and HD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HD is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 7.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 2.20x | 1.51x | 1.28x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.62 | $18.56 | $59.95 | $79.19 | $426.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.48 | $0.87 | $29.38 | $58.16 | $310.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.7% | +7.7% | +92.0% | +90.8% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 47.0 | 60.4 | 59.6 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 133K | 47K | 2.7M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
HD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAS as "Buy", HD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for HD (target: $408) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $54.00 | $82.36 | $408.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 38 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | +1.7% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.63 | $1.24 | $9.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +3.9% | 0.0% |
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MAS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FGI vs LESL vs FLXS vs MAS vs HD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus The Home Depot, Inc. at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Masco Corporation wins at 3. 40x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HD returned +184. 0% versus LESL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 163% more volatile than HD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HD leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD?
Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
7% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus -1. 6% for FGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAS leads at 35. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 40x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for The Home Depot, Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 26. 5% to $408. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD?
In this comparison, HD (2.
8% yield), MAS (1. 7% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FGI, LESL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FGI or LESL or FLXS or MAS or HD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 8% yield, +184. 0% 10Y return). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HD: +184. 0%, LESL: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGI and LESL and FLXS and MAS and HD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGI (Consumer Cyclical) and LESL (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and MAS (Industrials) and HD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FLXS, MAS, HD pay a dividend while FGI, LESL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.