Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FGO vs HRTG vs HCI vs PLMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
FGO vs HRTG vs HCI vs PLMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | — | $707M | $1.99B | $2.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $776M | $927M | $978M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $202M | $303M | $197M |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 35.6% | 66.5% | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | 37.6% | 34.8% | 47.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.0x | 9.0x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $100M | $68M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $559M | $1.21B | $107M |
FGO vs HRTG vs HCI vs PLMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 341.6 | +241.6% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGO vs HRTG vs HCI vs PLMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 33.2% margin vs PLMR's 20.2%
- 34.4% ROA vs PLMR's 6.8%, ROIC 95.7% vs 25.5%
HRTG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.33
- PEG 0.06 vs HCI's 0.19
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.06 vs 0.12
HCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- -5.2% vs PLMR's -30.1%
PLMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 472.0% 10Y total return vs HCI's 429.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 0.8%
- Beta 0.18
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.06 vs 0.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.2% margin vs PLMR's 20.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs HCI's 0.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.2% vs PLMR's -30.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.4% ROA vs PLMR's 6.8%, ROIC 95.7% vs 25.5% |
FGO vs HRTG vs HCI vs PLMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FGO vs HRTG vs HCI vs PLMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCI leads 1 • FGO leads 0 • PLMR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FGO and HCI and PLMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $978M annually — 46.0x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLMR's 20.2%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +59.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $776M | $927M | $978M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $280M | $454M | $267M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $202M | $303M | $197M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $203M | $282M | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +35.6% | +66.5% | +60.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +34.8% | +47.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +26.0% | +32.6% | +20.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +26.1% | +30.4% | +32.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.5% | +11.9% | +59.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +20.2% | +23.4% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 76% valuation discount to PLMR's 15.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.05x vs PLMR's 0.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $707M | $2.0B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $247M | $848M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 3.64x | 6.16x | 15.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.98x | 8.99x | 11.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.05x | 0.13x | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 0.91x | 1.93x | 10.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.83x | 2.21x | 3.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.41x | 1.77x | 3.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.06x | 4.48x | 7.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FGO and PLMR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $22 for PLMR. PLMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FGO's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs FGO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +65.5% | +43.7% | +30.8% | +21.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.4% | +8.8% | +12.7% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +95.7% | +15.4% | +6.8% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +73.8% | +38.8% | +40.6% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.20x | 0.06x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$459M | -$1.1B | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $559M | $1.2B | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $100M | $68M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 31.04x | 67.37x | 74.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $27,391 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,963 for PLMR. Over the past 12 months, HCI leads with a -5.2% total return vs PLMR's -30.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 70.5% vs PLMR's 32.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -15.7% | -16.5% | -17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -8.7% | -5.2% | -30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +395.9% | +178.7% | +131.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +173.9% | +117.5% | +69.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +73.0% | +429.1% | +472.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +70.5% | +40.7% | +32.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HCI and PLMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCI's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCI currently trades 72.8% from its 52-week high vs PLMR's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.33x | 0.38x | 0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.00 | $31.98 | $210.50 | $175.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $16.83 | $136.37 | $107.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +72.0% | +72.8% | +61.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 26.6 | 40.7 | 29.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 328K | 173K | 237K |
Analyst Outlook
HCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRTG as "Buy", HCI as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.5% upside for HRTG (target: $39) vs -17.4% for HCI (target: $127). HCI is the only dividend payer here at 0.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.00 | $126.50 | $110.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 14 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.50 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +0.3% | +0.1% | +1.3% |
HRTG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HCI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
FGO vs HRTG vs HCI vs PLMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Palomar Holdings, Inc. at 15. 2x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus HCI Group, Inc. 's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to +69. 6% for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +472. 0% versus HRTG's +73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus HCI Group, Inc. 's 0. 38β — meaning HCI is approximately 106% more volatile than PLMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 54% for FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to 15. 8% for FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR?
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
2% net margin versus 22. 5% for Palomar Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 28. 9% for PLMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus HCI Group, Inc. 's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 3x for Palomar Holdings, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTG: 69. 5% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR?
In this comparison, HCI (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. FGO, HRTG, PLMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FGO or HRTG or HCI or PLMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 0% yield, +429. 1% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGO and HRTG and HCI and PLMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and HRTG (Financial Services) and HCI (Financial Services) and PLMR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. HCI pays a dividend while FGO, HRTG, PLMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.