Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE vs BAND

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FIVN
Five9, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.70B
5Y Perf.-78.7%
TWLO
Twilio Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.86B
5Y Perf.-0.3%
NICE
NICE Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.-48.6%
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.-56.1%

FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE vs BAND — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FIVN logoFIVN
TWLO logoTWLO
NICE logoNICE
BAND logoBAND
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1.70B$29.86B$5.78B$1.56B
Revenue (TTM)$1.17B$5.30B$2.95B$209.36B
Net Income (TTM)$57M$104M$612M$4.11B
Gross Margin55.1%48.8%66.4%37.3%
Operating Margin4.7%4.7%21.9%-2.2%
Forward P/E7.0x36.3x8.7x27.4x
Total Debt$847M$1.08B$164M$701M
Cash & Equiv.$232M$682M$379M$103M

FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE vs BANDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FIVN
TWLO
NICE
BAND
StockMay 20May 26Return
Five9, Inc. (FIVN)10021.3-78.7%
Twilio Inc. (TWLO)10099.7-0.3%
NICE Ltd. (NICE)10051.4-48.6%
Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)10043.9-56.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE vs BAND

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NICE leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Five9, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. TWLO and BAND also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FIVN
Five9, Inc.
The Growth Play

FIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
  • Lower P/E (7.0x vs 8.7x)
Best for: growth exposure
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs BAND's 143.3%
  • 13.7% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
NICE
NICE Ltd.
The Income Pick

NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.72
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
  • Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
  • 20.8% margin vs TWLO's 2.0%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BAND is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +253.6% vs NICE's -40.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWLO logoTWLO13.7% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7%
ValueFIVN logoFIVNLower P/E (7.0x vs 8.7x)
Quality / MarginsNICE logoNICE20.8% margin vs TWLO's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyNICE logoNICEBeta 0.72 vs BAND's 1.86, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BAND logoBAND+253.6% vs NICE's -40.4%
Efficiency (ROA)NICE logoNICE11.8% ROA vs TWLO's 1.1%, ROIC 13.2% vs 1.6%

FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE vs BAND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FIVNFive9, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.1B
TWLOTwilio Inc.
FY 2025
Messaging
73.3%$2.9B
Other Communications
19.0%$747M
Segment
7.7%$303M
NICENICE Ltd.
FY 2025
Cloud
76.0%$2.2B
Service
19.0%$560M
Product
5.0%$147M
BANDBandwidth Inc.
FY 2025
CPaaS, Usage-Based Fees
73.8%$415M
CPaaS, Service Fees
26.2%$147M

FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE vs BAND — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNICELAGGINGTWLO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 178.2x FIVN's $1.2B. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWLO's 2.0%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$5.3B$2.9B$209.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$140M$415M$845M-$4.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$57M$104M$612M$4.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$206M$1.0B$665M$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.1%+48.8%+66.4%+37.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.7%+4.7%+21.9%-2.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.9%+2.0%+20.8%+2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.6%+19.0%+22.6%+0.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.2%+20.0%+9.0%+1197.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.0%+3.8%+56.5%+39.8%
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FIVN and NICE and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.

MetricFIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$29.9B$5.8B$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.3B$30.3B$5.6B$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS48.26x938.43x9.89x-113.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.96x36.33x8.74x27.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.84x77.16x6.59x50.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.48x5.89x1.96x2.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.46x4.03x1.56x3.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.45x28.91x8.22x0.02x
Evenly matched — FIVN and NICE and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+1.3%+16.4%+4.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.2%+1.1%+11.8%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.7%+1.6%+13.2%-1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%+1.9%+16.1%-1.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98773
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.08x0.14x0.04x1.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$615M$399M-$216M$598M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$232M$682M$379M$103M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$847M$1.1B$164M$701M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.94x-10.30x
NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TWLO five years ago would be worth $6,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,305 for FIVN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs NICE's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs FIVN's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.0%+42.4%-14.6%+242.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-11.9%+90.3%-40.4%+253.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.4%+259.4%-49.3%+330.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.0%-35.8%-59.1%-61.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+125.4%+584.5%+50.7%+143.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-27.2%+53.2%-20.2%+62.7%
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NICE and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs NICE's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x1.51x0.72x1.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$30.38$201.39$180.61$49.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.29$91.84$94.89$12.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+73.1%+97.9%+53.0%+98.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.178.440.990.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M2.2M631K670K
Evenly matched — NICE and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: FIVN as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", NICE as "Buy", BAND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for NICE (target: $151) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185).

MetricFIVN logoFIVNFive9, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.40$185.17$150.88$46.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts41522315
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.9%+2.9%+8.5%0.0%
BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAND leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallNICE Ltd. (NICE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FIVN vs TWLO vs NICE vs BAND: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Five9, Inc. (FIVN) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND?

On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND?

Over the past 5 years, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) delivered a total return of -35. 8%, compared to -87. 0% for Five9, Inc. (FIVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus NICE's +50. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 156% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND?

NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -1. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -1. 9% for BAND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NICE leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.

(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NICE: 57. 8% to $150. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is FIVN or TWLO or NICE or BAND better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NICE: +50. 7%, BAND: +143. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FIVN and TWLO and NICE and BAND?

These companies operate in different sectors (FIVN (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and NICE (Technology) and BAND (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FIVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWLO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59862%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FIVN and TWLO and NICE and BAND on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FIVN: 9.2% · TWLO: 20.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FIVN: 48.3x · TWLO: 938.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.