Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLD vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLD
Fold Holdings Inc

Asset Management - Cryptocurrency

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$60M
5Y Perf.-87.5%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-52.8%
MSTR
Strategy Inc

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$60.05B
5Y Perf.+16.2%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-34.2%
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.96B
5Y Perf.-10.3%

FLD vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLD logoFLD
BTBT logoBTBT
MSTR logoMSTR
MARA logoMARA
COIN logoCOIN
IndustryAsset Management - CryptocurrencyFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$60M$589M$60.05B$4.83B$50.96B
Revenue (TTM)$32M$164M$490M$907M$7.18B
Net Income (TTM)$-70M$137M$-12.36B$-1.31B$801M
Gross Margin44.4%61.9%68.1%-47.7%74.6%
Operating Margin-87.2%16.8%94.2%-90.6%20.0%
Forward P/E9.2x2.4x81.0x
Total Debt$0.00$14M$8.28B$3.65B$7.83B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$95M$2.30B$547M$11.29B

FLD vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLD
BTBT
MSTR
MARA
COIN
StockJul 24May 26Return
Fold Holdings Inc (FLD)10012.5-87.5%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10047.2-52.8%
Strategy Inc (MSTR)100116.2+16.2%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10065.8-34.2%
Coinbase Global, In… (COIN)10089.7-10.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLD vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT and MSTR are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Strategy Inc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. COIN and FLD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FLD
Fold Holdings Inc
The Banking Pick

FLD is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 1.55 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: stability
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9%
  • 19.0% ROA vs FLD's -41.2%, ROIC 6.5% vs -68.9%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
MSTR
Strategy Inc
The Income Pick

MSTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.59, yield 0.7%
  • 8.6% 10Y total return vs COIN's -41.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.59, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 5.62x
  • Beta 2.59, yield 0.7%, current ratio 5.62x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.
The Banking Pick

COIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and momentum.

  • 17.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
  • -1.8% vs FLD's -69.9%
Best for: quality and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9%
ValueMSTR logoMSTRLower P/E (2.4x vs 81.0x)
Quality / MarginsCOIN logoCOIN17.6% margin vs MSTR's -25.2%
Stability / SafetyFLD logoFLDBeta 1.55 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsMSTR logoMSTR0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)COIN logoCOIN-1.8% vs FLD's -69.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs FLD's -41.2%, ROIC 6.5% vs -68.9%

FLD vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLDFold Holdings Inc
FY 2025
Other Revenues
100.0%$63,663
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
MSTRStrategy Inc
FY 2025
Product Licenses And Subscription Services
50.0%$215M
Subscription And Circulation
40.8%$176M
License
9.2%$40M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
COINCoinbase Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing, Consumer, Net
47.9%$3.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Stablecoin
19.5%$1.3B
Subscription and Circulation, Blockchain Infrastructure Service
9.8%$677M
Subscription and Circulation, Other
8.0%$555M
Bank Servicing, Institutional
6.9%$480M
Other Revenue
4.3%$298M
Bank Servicing, Other
3.6%$253M

FLD vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSTRLAGGINGCOIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MSTR and COIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

COIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 225.9x FLD's $32M. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSTR's -25.2%.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$32M$164M$490M$907M$7.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$27M$166M$480M$627M$202M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$70M$137M-$12.4B-$1.3B$801M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$17M-$448M$7.6B-$312M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.4%+61.9%+68.1%-47.7%+74.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-87.2%+16.8%+94.2%-90.6%+20.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.2%+17.3%-25.2%-144.6%+17.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-50.7%-65.3%+15.5%-34.4%+33.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-101.2%+2.8%-132.0%-4.8%-7.2%
Evenly matched — MSTR and COIN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BTBT and MSTR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 79% valuation discount to COIN's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COIN's 29.3x.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
Market CapShares × price$60M$589M$60.1B$4.8B$51.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$52M$508M$66.0B$7.9B$47.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.75x9.15x-11.81x-3.44x43.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.37x81.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.86x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x29.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.87x3.60x125.83x5.32x7.10x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.82x0.56x1.04x1.30x3.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.00x
Evenly matched — BTBT and MSTR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-88 for FLD. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-87.5%+21.4%-24.1%-30.5%+5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.2%+19.0%-19.4%-17.1%+2.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.9%+6.5%-9.9%-9.0%+5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-31.6%+8.5%-12.6%-12.1%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946334
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.16x1.05x0.53x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M-$81M$6.0B$3.1B-$3.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$95M$2.3B$547M$11.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$14M$8.3B$3.6B$7.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.69x9.05x4.73x16.97x
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $28,983 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,121 for FLD. Over the past 12 months, COIN leads with a -1.8% total return vs FLD's -69.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 82.7% vs FLD's -51.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.4%-10.3%+14.4%+28.2%-18.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-69.9%-9.0%-54.2%-4.7%-1.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-19.7%+510.2%+36.1%+232.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-84.6%+189.8%-59.5%-26.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-60.4%+855.6%-51.6%-41.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-51.8%-7.1%+82.7%+10.8%+49.2%
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLD and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs FLD's 22.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.35x3.41x2.59x3.10x3.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.53$4.55$457.22$23.45$444.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.00$1.25$104.17$6.66$139.36
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+22.2%+40.2%+39.3%+54.2%+43.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.869.168.869.653.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded128K18.5M18.8M47.6M10.8M
Evenly matched — FLD and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", COIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 23.9% for COIN (target: $239). For income investors, MSTR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs BTBT's 0.31%.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …COIN logoCOINCoinbase Global, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$280.83$16.13$239.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2291937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$1.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.0%+1.6%
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). BTBT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallStrategy Inc (MSTR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLD vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs COIN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +189.

8%, compared to -88. 8% for Fold Holdings Inc (FLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +855. 6% versus FLD's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

35β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately 153% more volatile than FLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 3. 0% for Strategy Inc (MSTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1275. 0% for Fold Holdings Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

Coinbase Global, Inc.

(COIN) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COIN leads at 20. 0% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COIN leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.

4x forward P/E versus 81. 0x for Coinbase Global, Inc. — 78. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173. 2% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN?

In this comparison, MSTR (0.

7% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FLD, MARA, COIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FLD or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or COIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, BTBT: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLD and BTBT and MSTR and MARA and COIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (FLD (Financial Services) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services) and COIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSTR pays a dividend while FLD, BTBT, MARA, COIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FLD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSTR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COIN

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.