Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLWS vs OTLY vs AMZN vs FTDR vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Specialty Retail
Personal Products & Services
Internet Content & Information
FLWS vs OTLY vs AMZN vs FTDR vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Specialty Retail | Personal Products & Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $292M | $336M | $2.92T | $4.76B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $893M | $742.78B | $2.12B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $-152M | $90.80B | $260M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 32.6% | 50.6% | 54.3% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | -6.8% | 11.5% | 22.1% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 34.8x | 15.2x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $271M | $514M | $152.99B | $1.21B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $64M | $86.81B | $566M | $30.71B |
FLWS vs OTLY vs AMZN vs FTDR vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, … (FLWS) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
| Oatly Group AB (OTLY) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 168.3 | +68.3% |
| Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 337.7 | +237.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLWS vs OTLY vs AMZN vs FTDR vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLWS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
OTLY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FTDR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- beta 1.04
- PEG 0.72 vs AMZN's 1.24
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 1.55x
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.72 vs 0.99
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs FLWS's -8.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs FLWS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.72 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs OTLY's -17.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs OTLY's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs FLWS's -19.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs OTLY's -19.5%, ROIC 25.1% vs -10.5% |
FLWS vs OTLY vs AMZN vs FTDR vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLWS vs OTLY vs AMZN vs FTDR vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FTDR leads 1 • FLWS leads 0 • OTLY leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 831.5x OTLY's $893M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OTLY's -17.1%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $893M | $742.8B | $2.1B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$74M | -$21M | $155.9B | $554M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | -$152M | $90.8B | $260M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | -$28M | -$2.5B | $385M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | +32.6% | +50.6% | +54.3% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -6.8% | +11.5% | +22.1% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | -17.1% | +12.2% | +12.3% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | -3.2% | -0.3% | +18.2% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.6% | +15.6% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.3% | +4.8% | +74.8% | +18.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, FTDR trades at a 47% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FTDR offers better value at 0.94x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $292M | $336M | $2.92T | $4.8B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $516M | $786M | $2.98T | $5.4B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.46x | -2.14x | 37.82x | 19.86x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 34.77x | 15.17x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | 0.94x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 20.47x | 11.06x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.39x | 4.07x | 2.28x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 16.63x | 7.14x | 20.91x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 378.98x | 12.24x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR delivers a 99.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $100 in annual profit, vs $-4 for OTLY. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OTLY's 26.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTDR scores 8/9 vs FLWS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.5% | -4.3% | +23.3% | +99.9% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.9% | -19.5% | +11.5% | +11.9% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.7% | -10.5% | +14.7% | +31.2% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.1% | -27.2% | +15.3% | +23.0% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 26.12x | 0.37x | 5.01x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $225M | $449M | $66.2B | $646M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $64M | $86.8B | $566M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271M | $514M | $153.0B | $1.2B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | -1.41x | 39.96x | 5.24x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $267 for OTLY. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs FLWS's -19.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs OTLY's -37.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | -3.8% | +19.7% | +19.1% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.2% | +0.2% | +43.7% | +28.1% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.2% | -75.0% | +156.2% | +124.4% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -97.3% | +64.8% | +29.0% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.5% | -97.3% | +697.8% | +126.4% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.7% | -37.0% | +36.8% | +30.9% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTDR and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTDR is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OTLY's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FLWS's 54.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.52x | 1.51x | 1.04x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.44 | $18.84 | $278.56 | $70.77 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.88 | $9.26 | $185.01 | $48.47 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.3% | +57.2% | +97.3% | +96.0% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 40.7 | 81.1 | 59.8 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 780K | 64K | 45.5M | 689K | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLWS as "Buy", OTLY as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", FTDR as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.4% upside for FLWS (target: $10) vs 2.1% for FTDR (target: $69). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $14.64 | $306.77 | $69.33 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 18 | 94 | 12 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.9% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FTDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FLWS vs OTLY vs AMZN vs FTDR vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the cheapest at 19. 9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Frontdoor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontdoor, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -97. 3% for Oatly Group AB (OTLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus OTLY's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Oatly Group AB's 1. 52β — meaning OTLY is approximately 47% more volatile than FTDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 26% for Oatly Group AB — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -17. 7% for Oatly Group AB — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -12. 2% for FLWS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLWS: 107. 4% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FLWS, OTLY, AMZN, FTDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLWS or OTLY or AMZN or FTDR or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Oatly Group AB (OTLY) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, OTLY: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLWS and OTLY and AMZN and FTDR and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLWS (Consumer Cyclical) and OTLY (Consumer Defensive) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and FTDR (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FLWS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OTLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; FTDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.