FLWS vs UPS

For growth investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.

(UPS) is the stronger pick with -2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, United Parcel Service, Inc.

(UPS) delivered a total return of -40. 0%, compared to -86. 4% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPS returned +44. 7% versus FLWS's -42. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.

(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning FLWS is approximately 41% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 101% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Parcel Service, Inc.

(UPS) is pulling ahead at -2. 5% versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Parcel Service, Inc. grew EPS -3. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UPS leads at -4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

United Parcel Service, Inc.

(UPS) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -11. 9% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPS leads at 9. 6% versus -12. 2% for FLWS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLWS leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLWS: 107.

4% to $9. 50.

In this comparison, UPS (6.

3% yield) pays a dividend. FLWS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.

(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, FLWS: -42. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FLWS (Consumer Cyclical) and UPS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FLWS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. UPS pays a dividend while FLWS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.