Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FMAO vs CZWI vs MVBF vs HFWA vs OVBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FMAO vs CZWI vs MVBF vs HFWA vs OVBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $380M | $203M | $339M | $932M | $212M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $90M | $270M | $336M | $94M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $14M | $27M | $68M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 62.3% | 54.7% | 71.7% | 72.4% | 67.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 7.0% | 13.6% | 23.2% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 11.8x | 15.2x | 13.3x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $300M | $52M | $77M | $42M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $119M | $244M | $53M | $15K |
FMAO vs CZWI vs MVBF vs HFWA vs OVBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers & Merchants… (FMAO) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 185.8 | +85.8% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| Ohio Valley Banc Co… (OVBC) | 100 | 179.5 | +79.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMAO vs CZWI vs MVBF vs HFWA vs OVBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMAO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 79.5%
- PEG 0.72 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 13.6x), PEG 0.72 vs 1.49
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs OVBC's 144.9%
MVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- +53.4% vs FMAO's +15.0%
HFWA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 3.5%
- 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%
OVBC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 32.4%, current ratio 56092.09x
- Beta 0.33, yield 2.0%, current ratio 56092.09x
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Beta 0.33 vs FMAO's 1.04, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 13.6x), PEG 0.72 vs 1.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs FMAO's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs FMAO's +15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MVBF's 0.6% |
FMAO vs CZWI vs MVBF vs HFWA vs OVBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FMAO vs CZWI vs MVBF vs HFWA vs OVBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HFWA leads in 2 of 6 categories
FMAO leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • OVBC leads 1 • MVBF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA is the larger business by revenue, generating $336M annually — 3.7x CZWI's $90M. HFWA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 10.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $90M | $270M | $336M | $94M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $9M | $39M | $80M | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $14M | $27M | $68M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $11M | $2M | $86M | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.3% | +54.7% | +71.7% | +72.4% | +67.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +7.0% | +13.6% | +23.2% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +16.0% | +10.0% | +20.1% | +16.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +11.5% | +0.8% | +25.5% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +63.0% | -55.6% | +85.7% | +58.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, FMAO trades at a 44% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FMAO offers better value at 0.60x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $380M | $203M | $339M | $932M | $212M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $583M | $136M | $172M | $922M | $267M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.11x | 14.44x | 12.81x | 13.99x | 13.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.81x | 11.78x | 15.23x | 13.33x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | 2.85x | — | 1.60x | 1.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | 15.28x | 4.67x | 11.58x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 2.25x | 1.25x | 2.77x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.09x | 1.04x | 1.02x | 1.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 19.55x | 160.42x | 10.88x | 12.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HFWA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OVBC delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for HFWA. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMAO's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +7.8% | +8.5% | +7.5% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +2.0% | +7.0% | +5.2% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +0.6% | +8.2% | +4.1% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.28x | 0.23x | 0.05x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $202M | -$67M | -$167M | -$10M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $119M | $244M | $53M | $14,845 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $300M | $52M | $77M | $42M | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.16x | 0.54x | 0.87x | 0.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OVBC five years ago would be worth $21,582 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,234 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +53.4% total return vs FMAO's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FMAO's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.7% | +21.5% | +4.3% | +17.7% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | +45.6% | +53.4% | +24.5% | +30.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.8% | +160.0% | +65.3% | +92.4% | +92.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +71.2% | -27.7% | +10.4% | +115.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.5% | +157.0% | +135.5% | +109.7% | +144.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +37.5% | +18.2% | +24.4% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
OVBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OVBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMAO's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OVBC currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs MVBF's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.46x | 0.84x | 0.97x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.79 | $22.62 | $29.59 | $28.90 | $47.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.59 | $12.83 | $17.13 | $21.32 | $27.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +93.2% | +89.2% | +94.9% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 63.7 | 50.8 | 54.6 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 40K | 34K | 289K | 12K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and HFWA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FMAO as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", MVBF as "Buy", HFWA as "Buy", OVBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs 3.0% for FMAO (target: $29). For income investors, HFWA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.46% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | — | $30.00 | $31.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 2 | 7 | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +1.8% | +2.5% | +3.5% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $0.37 | $0.66 | $0.95 | $0.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.1% | +3.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
HFWA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FMAO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FMAO vs CZWI vs MVBF vs HFWA vs OVBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC?
On trailing P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC?
Over the past 5 years, Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) delivered a total return of +115. 8%, compared to -27. 7% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus HFWA's +109. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning FMAO is approximately 218% more volatile than OVBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 81% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC?
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HFWA leads at 23. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for MVB Financial Corp. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 14. 3% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is FMAO or CZWI or MVBF or HFWA or OVBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 2. 0% yield, +144. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OVBC: +144. 9%, FMAO: +144. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMAO and CZWI and MVBF and HFWA and OVBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMAO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; OVBC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.