FNF vs ICE vs CME vs FAF vs CBOE

For growth investors, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the stronger pick with 21.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for CME Group Inc. (CME). First American Financial Corporation (FAF) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the cheapest at 11.

6x versus Cboe Global Markets, Inc. at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. wins at 1. 38x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) delivered a total return of +223. 7%, compared to +20. 7% for First American Financial Corporation (FAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBOE returned +463. 6% versus FAF's +138. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus First American Financial Corporation's 0. 59β — meaning FAF is approximately -295% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is pulling ahead at 21.

6% versus 6. 4% for CME Group Inc. (CME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First American Financial Corporation grew EPS 376. 2% year-over-year, compared to -52. 5% for Fidelity National Financial, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FNF leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CME Group Inc.

(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus 4. 2% for Fidelity National Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 9. 9% for FNF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNF leads at 98. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 27. 0x for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. — 18. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNF: 33. 3% to $67. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 27), 0. 8% yield, +463. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBOE: +463. 6%, FAF: +138. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FNF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FAF is a small-cap high-growth stock; CBOE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.