FNKO vs LESL

For growth investors, Leslie's, Inc.

(LESL) is the stronger pick with -6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). Analysts rate Funko, Inc. (FNKO) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Funko, Inc.

(FNKO) delivered a total return of -82. 5%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FNKO returned -36. 9% versus LESL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Leslie's, Inc.

(LESL) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 20β versus Funko, Inc. 's 3. 15β — meaning FNKO is approximately 43% more volatile than LESL relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Leslie's, Inc.

(LESL) is pulling ahead at -6. 6% versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Funko, Inc. grew EPS -342. 9% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LESL leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Funko, Inc.

(FNKO) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 4% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps -7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LESL leads at 1. 1% versus -5. 0% for FNKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNKO leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Funko, Inc.

(FNKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FNKO: -36. 9%, LESL: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.