Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FNKO vs LESL vs HAS vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Leisure
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
FNKO vs LESL vs HAS vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Home Improvement | Leisure | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $249M | $13M | $13.70B | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $918M | $1.21B | $4.70B | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $-275M | $-322M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 34.5% | 70.3% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | -0.2% | 22.5% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 16.8x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $292M | $1.01B | $3.40B | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $64M | $777M | $40M |
FNKO vs LESL vs HAS vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Funko, Inc. (FNKO) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 197.4 | +97.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FNKO vs LESL vs HAS vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FNKO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
LESL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.16, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth -183.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.1%
- Beta 1.16, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.38x
- 13.7% revenue growth vs FNKO's -13.5%
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs HAS's 42.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 2.78x
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 16.8x)
- 4.8% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs FNKO's -13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 16.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs FNKO's 3.15 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs LESL's -89.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.6% |
FNKO vs LESL vs HAS vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FNKO vs LESL vs HAS vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories
HAS leads 2 • FNKO leads 0 • LESL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 10.3x FLXS's $458M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, HAS holds the edge at +31.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $918M | $1.2B | $4.7B | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | $6M | $1.2B | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | -$275M | -$322M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $8M | $830M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +34.5% | +70.3% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -0.2% | +22.5% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | -22.7% | -6.9% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +0.6% | +17.7% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | -16.0% | +31.3% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.5% | -85.8% | +6.6% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FNKO's 36.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $249M | $13M | $13.7B | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $499M | $961M | $16.3B | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.60x | -0.06x | -42.34x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.79x | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 36.78x | 20.25x | 13.28x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.01x | 2.91x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | — | 24.15x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 16.51x | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-52 for HAS. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAS's 6.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs FNKO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.1% | — | -52.3% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | -42.4% | -5.8% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.6% | +1.6% | +22.4% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.8% | +2.1% | +24.5% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | — | 6.01x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $250M | $948M | $2.6B | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $64M | $777M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $292M | $1.0B | $3.4B | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.06x | -3.06x | 0.38x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs LESL's -89.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs LESL's -81.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.7% | -17.3% | +18.2% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.3% | -89.7% | +63.1% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.3% | -99.3% | +76.7% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -99.7% | +11.6% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.9% | -99.7% | +42.9% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.5% | -81.3% | +20.9% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HAS and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAS is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FNKO's 3.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 7.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.15x | 2.20x | 1.16x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.04 | $18.56 | $106.98 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $0.87 | $60.64 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.8% | +7.7% | +91.0% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 47.0 | 57.8 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 845K | 133K | 1.6M | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
HAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FNKO as "Hold", HAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for FNKO (target: $7) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HAS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.87% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | — | $111.67 | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | — | 33 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.9% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.80 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HAS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FNKO vs LESL vs HAS vs FLXS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS?
On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus LESL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Funko, Inc. 's 3. 15β — meaning FNKO is approximately 171% more volatile than HAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 6% for Hasbro, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LESL leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAS leads at 22. 5% versus -5. 0% for FNKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAS leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Hasbro, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNKO: 45. 7% to $6. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS?
In this comparison, HAS (2.
9% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FNKO, LESL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FNKO or LESL or HAS or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16), 2. 9% yield). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAS: +42. 9%, LESL: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FNKO and LESL and HAS and FLXS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FNKO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. HAS, FLXS pay a dividend while FNKO, LESL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.