Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FOXF vs MFIN vs ENVA vs BCAL vs WRLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Regional
Financial - Credit Services
FOXF vs MFIN vs ENVA vs BCAL vs WRLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $779M | $225M | $4.30B | $613M | $753M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.48B | $353M | $3.15B | $233M | $565M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-300M | $47M | $327M | $63M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 96.7% | 50.1% | 79.4% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | -18.0% | 50.5% | 23.5% | 37.8% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.4x | 8.0x | 10.5x | 11.4x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $780M | $316M | $4.56B | $72M | $526M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $202M | $72M | $52M | $10M |
FOXF vs MFIN vs ENVA vs BCAL vs WRLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Factory Holding… (FOXF) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1219.1 | +1119.1% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOXF vs MFIN vs ENVA vs BCAL vs WRLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOXF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 62.3%, current ratio 27.10x
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 21.1x)
ENVA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs BCAL's 133.6%
- +87.8% vs FOXF's -8.6%
- 5.2% ROA vs FOXF's -16.5%, ROIC 10.4% vs -24.2%
BCAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- PEG 0.36 vs WRLD's 0.59
- 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
- 27.1% margin vs FOXF's -20.2%
WRLD is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 41.9% vs BCAL's 4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 21.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.1% margin vs FOXF's -20.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs FOXF's 1.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BCAL's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.8% vs FOXF's -8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs FOXF's -16.5%, ROIC 10.4% vs -24.2% |
FOXF vs MFIN vs ENVA vs BCAL vs WRLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FOXF vs MFIN vs ENVA vs BCAL vs WRLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ENVA leads 1 • FOXF leads 0 • BCAL leads 0 • WRLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 13.5x BCAL's $233M. BCAL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOXF's -20.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $353M | $3.2B | $233M | $565M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$196M | $111M | $815M | $92M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$300M | $47M | $327M | $63M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $126M | $1.9B | $57M | $252M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +96.7% | +50.1% | +79.4% | +70.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.0% | +50.5% | +23.5% | +37.8% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | +12.2% | +9.8% | +27.1% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +35.7% | +56.2% | +24.4% | +44.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.2% | +16.3% | +28.6% | -2.0% | -107.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 64% valuation discount to ENVA's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WRLD offers better value at 0.26x vs BCAL's 0.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $779M | $225M | $4.3B | $613M | $753M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $340M | $8.8B | $633M | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.42x | 5.37x | 14.90x | 9.88x | 9.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.42x | 7.97x | 10.49x | 11.42x | 21.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.31x | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1.90x | 11.26x | 7.19x | 7.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.64x | 1.37x | 2.63x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 0.46x | 3.40x | 1.08x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.89x | 1.78x | 2.43x | 10.77x | 3.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ENVA and BCAL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-37 for FOXF. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENVA's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs FOXF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.0% | +9.4% | +24.9% | +11.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.5% | +1.6% | +5.2% | +1.6% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.2% | +17.2% | +10.4% | +10.6% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.9% | +10.0% | +13.5% | +5.0% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.16x | 0.62x | 3.41x | 0.12x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $722M | $115M | $4.5B | $20M | $516M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $202M | $72M | $52M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $780M | $316M | $4.6B | $72M | $526M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.17x | 1.07x | 79.01x | 1.55x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $46,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,158 for FOXF. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +87.8% total return vs FOXF's -8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.0% vs FOXF's -42.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.6% | -4.9% | +6.5% | +3.3% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.6% | +8.2% | +87.8% | +32.9% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | +58.9% | +302.0% | +47.7% | +32.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +23.2% | +368.1% | +42.7% | +11.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +60.3% | +2034.9% | +133.6% | +266.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.1% | +16.7% | +59.0% | +13.9% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENVA and BCAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOXF's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FOXF's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 1.15x | 1.48x | 0.90x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.18 | $11.00 | $176.68 | $20.47 | $185.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.08 | $7.88 | $89.00 | $14.07 | $110.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.6% | +86.9% | +97.6% | +93.2% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 55.0 | 65.4 | 62.0 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 658K | 59K | 227K | 189K | 160K |
Analyst Outlook
MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOXF as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy", BCAL as "Buy", WRLD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for FOXF (target: $22) vs 15.4% for BCAL (target: $22). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | — | $199.50 | $22.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.7% | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 | — | $0.10 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% | +5.0% | +1.0% | +7.2% |
MFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ENVA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FOXF vs MFIN vs ENVA vs BCAL vs WRLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Enova International, Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to -88. 4% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 3% versus FOXF's +7. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Fox Factory Holding Corp. 's 1. 55β — meaning FOXF is approximately 73% more volatile than BCAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 3% for Enova International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD?
Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
1% net margin versus -37. 1% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus -35. 6% for FOXF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for World Acceptance Corporation — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOXF: 15. 8% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), BCAL (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. FOXF, ENVA, WRLD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOXF or MFIN or ENVA or BCAL or WRLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 0. 5% yield, +133. 6% 10Y return). Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAL: +133. 6%, FOXF: +7. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOXF and MFIN and ENVA and BCAL and WRLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (FOXF (Consumer Cyclical) and MFIN (Financial Services) and ENVA (Financial Services) and BCAL (Financial Services) and WRLD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FOXF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock. MFIN, BCAL pay a dividend while FOXF, ENVA, WRLD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.