FRGT vs HUBG vs JBHT vs XPO vs ODFL

For growth investors, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hub Group, Inc.

(HUBG) is the cheapest at 25. 2x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 77. 4x. On forward P/E, Hub Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 98x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) delivered a total return of +298. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 2% versus FRGT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), J.

B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning XPO is approximately 62% more volatile than JBHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -19. 5% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freight Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 96. 8% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for Hub Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPO leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.

(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -40. 8% for Freight Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus -47. 3% for FRGT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBG leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus Hub Group, Inc. 's 21. 98x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) trades at 26. 8x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ODFL: 5. 0% to $208. 19.

In this comparison, HUBG (1.

2% yield), JBHT (0. 7% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FRGT, XPO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.

(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +843. 0% 10Y return). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +843. 0%, XPO: +21. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FRGT (Technology) and HUBG (Industrials) and JBHT (Industrials) and XPO (Industrials) and ODFL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

HUBG, JBHT, ODFL pay a dividend while FRGT, XPO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.