Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRSH vs BILL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
FRSH vs BILL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2.50B | $3.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $871M | $1.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $180M | $163K |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $67M | $1.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $632M | $1.14B |
FRSH vs BILL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
| Bill.com Holdings, … (BILL) | 100 | 14.1 | -85.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRSH vs BILL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRSH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.15
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 296.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 2.14x
BILL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs FRSH's -81.0%
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 15.9x)
- -19.0% vs FRSH's -36.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% revenue growth vs BILL's 13.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.7% margin vs BILL's 0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs BILL's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -19.0% vs FRSH's -36.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs BILL's 0.0%, ROIC 2.0% vs -1.4% |
FRSH vs BILL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FRSH vs BILL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRSH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 1.8x FRSH's $871M. FRSH is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BILL's 0.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $871M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $180M | $163,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $254M | $370M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +80.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +0.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | +13.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FRSH and BILL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, FRSH trades at a 91% valuation discount to BILL's 163.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FRSH's 27.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BILL's 492.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.33x | 163.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.87x | 15.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.13x | 492.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.98x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.57x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.18x | 12.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRSH leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRSH delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $0 for BILL. FRSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BILL's 0.45x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.5% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | -1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.2% | -1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$566M | $633M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $632M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $67M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FRSH and BILL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BILL five years ago would be worth $2,439 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,899 for FRSH. Over the past 12 months, BILL leads with a -19.0% total return vs FRSH's -36.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRSH at -12.5% vs BILL's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.2% | -25.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.5% | -19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | -61.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | -75.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.5% | -27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRSH and BILL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRSH is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILL's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BILL currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs FRSH's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.14 | $57.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.79 | $34.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.8M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FRSH as "Buy" and BILL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.1% upside for BILL (target: $54) vs 26.6% for FRSH (target: $11).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.43 | $54.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +15.5% | +11.6% |
FRSH leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
FRSH vs BILL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRSH or BILL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the stronger pick with 16. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 4% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. (BILL). Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRSH or BILL?
On trailing P/E, Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. at 163. 6x. On forward P/E, Bill. com Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRSH or BILL?
Over the past 5 years, Bill.
com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) delivered a total return of -75. 6%, compared to -81. 0% for Freshworks Inc. (FRSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BILL returned +6. 0% versus FRSH's -81. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRSH or BILL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning BILL is approximately 64% more volatile than FRSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 45% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRSH or BILL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is pulling ahead at 16. 4% versus 13. 4% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. (BILL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshworks Inc. grew EPS 296. 9% year-over-year, compared to 185. 2% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILL leads at 31. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRSH or BILL?
Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 1. 6% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRSH leads at 1. 6% versus -5. 5% for BILL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRSH leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRSH or BILL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bill.
com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for Freshworks Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BILL: 44. 1% to $54. 22.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRSH or BILL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FRSH or BILL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Freshworks Inc.
(FRSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15)). Bill. com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRSH: -81. 0%, BILL: +6. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRSH and BILL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRSH is a small-cap high-growth stock; BILL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.