Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FRST vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FRST
Primis Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$360M
5Y Perf.+45.0%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+77.2%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.+43.9%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$580M
5Y Perf.+271.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-66.0%

FRST vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FRST logoFRST
MNSB logoMNSB
NBTB logoNBTB
CARE logoCARE
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$360M$176M$2.35B$580M$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$313M$136M$867M$255M$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$61M$16M$169M$31M$382M
Gross Margin67.6%54.4%72.1%61.7%38.1%
Operating Margin23.2%14.0%25.3%15.7%17.5%
Forward P/E9.1x10.4x10.8x4.8x7.5x
Total Debt$262M$70M$327M$179M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$144M$25M$185M$105M$599M

FRST vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FRST
MNSB
NBTB
CARE
FIS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Primis Financial Co… (FRST)100145.0+45.0%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100177.2+77.2%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100143.9+43.9%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100371.0+271.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10034.0-66.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FRST vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FRST leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. NBT Bancorp Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. CARE and FIS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FRST
Primis Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

FRST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 23.0%, EPS growth 477.3%
  • 23.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
  • 19.7% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
  • +72.1% vs FIS's -35.3%
Best for: growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs CARE's 2.7%
Best for: bank quality
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.

  • 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: dividends
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 112.9% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 126.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 42.5%, current ratio 0.75x
  • Beta 0.56 vs NBTB's 0.89
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
  • PEG 0.31 vs NBTB's 1.53
  • Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.53
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRST logoFRST23.0% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (7.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.53
Quality / MarginsFRST logoFRST19.7% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Stability / SafetyCARE logoCAREBeta 0.56 vs NBTB's 0.89
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FRST logoFRST+72.1% vs FIS's -35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FRST logoFRST1.6% ROA vs CARE's 0.7%, ROIC 9.2% vs 5.7%

FRST vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FRSTPrimis Financial Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

FRST vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFRSTLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FRST and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 80.2x MNSB's $136M. FRST is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$313M$136M$867M$255M$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$23M$241M$46M$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$61M$16M$169M$31M$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$13M$225M$30M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.6%+54.4%+72.1%+61.7%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.2%+14.0%+25.3%+15.7%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.7%+11.5%+19.5%+12.3%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.9%+7.8%+25.2%+12.5%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%+120.9%+39.5%+8.3%+92.3%
Evenly matched — FRST and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FRST leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.9x trailing earnings, FRST trades at a 91% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FRST offers better value at 0.28x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$360M$176M$2.4B$580M$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$479M$221M$2.5B$654M$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.86x13.36x13.53x18.71x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.10x10.45x10.80x4.77x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.28x1.92x2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.60x11.58x10.35x16.34x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.15x1.30x2.71x2.28x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.85x0.82x1.21x1.40x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.89x16.57x10.75x18.25x9.97x
FRST leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FRST leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FRST delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRST's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.8%+7.3%+9.5%+7.6%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+0.7%+1.1%+0.7%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+5.0%+7.9%+5.7%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.1%+0.9%+2.4%+1.5%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965786
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.62x0.32x0.17x0.43x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$119M$45M$142M$73M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$144M$25M$185M$105M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$262M$70M$327M$179M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.82x0.31x1.05x0.39x4.64x
FRST leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FRST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CARE five years ago would be worth $18,721 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FRST leads with a +72.1% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRST at 29.3% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+19.4%+9.3%+34.8%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+72.1%+26.4%+9.0%+69.0%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+116.0%+21.5%+54.1%+94.7%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+13.2%+20.6%+29.9%+87.2%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.1%+126.9%+102.2%+112.9%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+29.3%+6.7%+15.5%+24.9%-2.2%
FRST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARE currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.66x0.89x0.56x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.97$25.17$46.92$26.58$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.69$17.86$39.20$15.37$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.5%+93.4%+96.1%+98.5%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.950.457.375.443.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded191K58K236K276K5.5M
CARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FRST as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CARE as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -4.0% for FRST (target: $14). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs FRST's 2.74%.

MetricFRST logoFRSTPrimis Financial …MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$46.00$27.00$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts2110437
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+3.2%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises021201
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$1.43$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%0.0%+0.4%+3.4%0.0%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FRST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CARE leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallPrimis Financial Corp. (FRST)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FRST vs MNSB vs NBTB vs CARE vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Primis Financial Corp.

(FRST) is the stronger pick with 23. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primis Financial Corp. (FRST) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Primis Financial Corp.

(FRST) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) delivered a total return of +87. 2%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 9% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 58% more volatile than CARE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 62% for Primis Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Primis Financial Corp.

(FRST) is pulling ahead at 23. 0% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primis Financial Corp. grew EPS 477. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS?

Primis Financial Corp.

(FRST) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS?

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), FRST (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB, CARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FRST or MNSB or NBTB or CARE or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FRST and MNSB and NBTB and CARE and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (FRST (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CARE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FRST is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FRST, NBTB, FIS pay a dividend while MNSB, CARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FRST

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NBTB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CARE

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FRST and MNSB and NBTB and CARE and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FRST: 23.0% · MNSB: -1.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(FRST: 19.7% · MNSB: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FRST: 5.9x · MNSB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.