Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FSBW vs WAFD vs HFWA vs COLB vs NWBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FSBW vs WAFD vs HFWA vs COLB vs NWBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $310M | $2.73B | $932M | $7.04B | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $218M | $1.41B | $336M | $3.21B | $877M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $243M | $68M | $550M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 50.9% | 72.4% | 67.7% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 20.5% | 23.2% | 23.4% | 18.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 10.9x | 13.3x | 9.7x | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $141M | $1.82B | $42M | $4.01B | $446M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $657M | $53M | $511M | $234M |
FSBW vs WAFD vs HFWA vs COLB vs NWBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) | 100 | 195.6 | +95.6% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSBW vs WAFD vs HFWA vs COLB vs NWBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSBW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 288.9% 10Y total return vs HFWA's 109.7%
- NIM 4.1% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 9.7x)
- 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4%
WAFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5%
Among these 5 stocks, HFWA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.6% vs FSBW's +8.4%
NWBI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 5.4%
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
- PEG 1.24 vs WAFD's 3.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 9.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs COLB's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs FSBW's +8.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% |
FSBW vs WAFD vs HFWA vs COLB vs NWBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FSBW vs WAFD vs HFWA vs COLB vs NWBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HFWA leads in 2 of 6 categories
FSBW leads 1 • WAFD leads 0 • COLB leads 0 • NWBI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 14.8x FSBW's $218M. HFWA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWBI's 14.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $218M | $1.4B | $336M | $3.2B | $877M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $55M | $277M | $80M | $895M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $243M | $68M | $550M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $226M | $86M | $724M | $142M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.5% | +50.9% | +72.4% | +67.7% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +20.5% | +23.2% | +23.4% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +16.0% | +20.1% | +17.1% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +14.8% | +25.5% | +22.0% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +46.3% | +85.7% | +5.9% | +19.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FSBW leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, FSBW trades at a 36% valuation discount to NWBI's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HFWA offers better value at 1.60x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $310M | $2.7B | $932M | $7.0B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $437M | $3.9B | $922M | $10.5B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.65x | 13.56x | 13.99x | 12.85x | 15.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.25x | 10.93x | 13.33x | 9.65x | 10.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.41x | 1.60x | — | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.96x | 12.98x | 11.58x | 11.76x | 13.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 1.93x | 2.77x | 2.19x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 0.94x | 1.02x | 1.12x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.97x | 13.09x | 10.88x | 9.97x | 14.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HFWA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSBW delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for NWBI. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +8.0% | +7.5% | +8.4% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +3.9% | +5.2% | +5.4% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +5.7% | +4.1% | +2.0% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.60x | 0.05x | 0.51x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $128M | $1.2B | -$10M | $3.5B | $213M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $657M | $53M | $511M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $141M | $1.8B | $42M | $4.0B | $446M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.48x | 0.87x | 0.82x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FSBW and HFWA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSBW five years ago would be worth $13,376 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,185 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +32.6% total return vs FSBW's +8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HFWA at 24.4% vs WAFD's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +11.9% | +17.7% | +6.2% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +28.5% | +24.5% | +32.6% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.0% | +51.6% | +92.4% | +75.3% | +56.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.8% | +22.5% | +10.4% | -18.1% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +288.9% | +84.4% | +109.7% | +51.1% | +52.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.5% | +14.9% | +24.4% | +20.6% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.81x | 0.97x | 1.37x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.22 | $36.12 | $28.90 | $32.70 | $14.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.65 | $26.31 | $21.32 | $21.91 | $11.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +98.8% | +94.9% | +90.4% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 68.3 | 54.6 | 60.4 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 661K | 289K | 2.7M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FSBW and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FSBW as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HFWA as "Buy", COLB as "Buy", NWBI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs WAFD's 2.96%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $35.00 | $31.33 | $32.92 | $14.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.5% | +3.8% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.34 | $1.05 | $0.95 | $1.13 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | +3.7% | +0.6% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
HFWA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FSBW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FSBW vs WAFD vs HFWA vs COLB vs NWBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI?
On trailing P/E, FS Bancorp, Inc.
(FSBW) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Northwest Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, FS Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northwest Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI?
Over the past 5 years, FS Bancorp, Inc.
(FSBW) delivered a total return of +33. 8%, compared to -18. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSBW returned +288. 9% versus COLB's +51. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning COLB is approximately 88% more volatile than NWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Financial Corporation grew EPS 58. 1% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI?
Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus 14. 4% for Northwest Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLB leads at 23. 4% versus 18. 8% for NWBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for Heritage Financial Corporation — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 14. 3% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 3. 0% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD).
09Is FSBW or WAFD or HFWA or COLB or NWBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FS Bancorp, Inc.
(FSBW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 3. 2% yield, +288. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSBW: +288. 9%, COLB: +51. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSBW and WAFD and HFWA and COLB and NWBI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FSBW is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.