Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FSV vs HD vs LOW vs WSO vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Home Improvement
Industrial - Distribution
Construction
FSV vs HD vs LOW vs WSO vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Home Improvement | Home Improvement | Industrial - Distribution | Construction |
| Market Cap | $5.78B | $313.33B | $126.13B | $17.10B | $8.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.52B | $164.68B | $86.29B | $7.24B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $146M | $14.16B | $6.65B | $496M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 33.3% | 33.5% | 28.4% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 12.7% | 11.8% | 9.8% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.5x | 21.0x | 17.9x | 33.4x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.62B | $19.01B | $7.19B | $479M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $180M | $1.39B | $982M | $433M | $182M |
FSV vs HD vs LOW vs WSO vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FirstService Corpor… (FSV) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 100 | 172.8 | +72.8% |
| Watsco, Inc. (WSO) | 100 | 236.5 | +136.5% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 358.3 | +258.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSV vs HD vs LOW vs WSO vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 87.2%, current ratio 1.25x
- 5.8% FFO/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- Beta 0.64 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
HD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 2.9%
- 8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
- 13.5% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 32.1% vs 6.4%
LOW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +2.2% vs BLDR's -33.3%
WSO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.10, yield 3.0%, current ratio 4.12x
- 3.0% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HD's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs WSO's 276.6%
- PEG 1.67 vs HD's 5.87
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 33.4x), PEG 1.67 vs 2.83
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% FFO/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 33.4x), PEG 1.67 vs 2.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs HD's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.2% vs BLDR's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 32.1% vs 6.4% |
FSV vs HD vs LOW vs WSO vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FSV vs HD vs LOW vs WSO vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLDR leads in 1 of 6 categories
LOW leads 1 • WSO leads 1 • FSV leads 0 • HD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HD and LOW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 29.8x FSV's $5.5B. HD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.5B | $164.7B | $86.3B | $7.2B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $521M | $24.2B | $12.3B | $757M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $146M | $14.2B | $6.7B | $496M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $322M | $12.6B | $7.7B | $702M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +33.3% | +33.5% | +28.4% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +12.7% | +11.8% | +9.8% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +8.6% | +7.7% | +6.8% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +7.7% | +8.9% | +9.7% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | -3.8% | +10.9% | +0.1% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.7% | -14.6% | -11.0% | -3.1% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, LOW trades at a 52% valuation discount to FSV's 39.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LOW offers better value at 2.14x vs HD's 6.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.8B | $313.3B | $126.1B | $17.1B | $8.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $330.9B | $132.3B | $17.1B | $13.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.77x | 22.15x | 19.01x | 34.34x | 19.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.51x | 20.98x | 17.89x | 33.37x | 13.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.25x | 6.20x | 2.14x | 2.91x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.85x | 13.70x | 10.94x | 23.29x | 9.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 1.90x | 1.46x | 2.36x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.09x | 24.53x | — | 4.95x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.84x | 24.78x | 16.49x | 31.94x | 9.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HD delivers a 110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $110 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. WSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HD's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOW scores 6/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +110.5% | — | +15.3% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +13.5% | +12.3% | +10.8% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +32.1% | +76.2% | +16.6% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +29.8% | +33.6% | +19.0% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 1.48x | — | 0.15x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $17.6B | $6.2B | $46M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $180M | $1.4B | $982M | $433M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $19.0B | $7.2B | $479M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.62x | 8.71x | 8.90x | — | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSO five years ago would be worth $15,861 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,004 for FSV. Over the past 12 months, LOW leads with a +2.2% total return vs BLDR's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSO at 10.5% vs BLDR's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.6% | -8.2% | -7.8% | +22.9% | -28.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.0% | -10.3% | +2.2% | -9.6% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.9% | +18.1% | +16.1% | +34.9% | -33.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.0% | +7.4% | +23.2% | +58.6% | +52.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.4% | +181.8% | +240.6% | +276.6% | +560.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.1% | +5.7% | +5.1% | +10.5% | -12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FSV and WSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSV is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.84x | 0.86x | 1.10x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $209.66 | $426.75 | $293.06 | $496.25 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $124.37 | $310.42 | $210.33 | $323.05 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.9% | +73.9% | +76.9% | +84.8% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.1 | 33.8 | 34.3 | 49.3 | 29.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 181K | 3.6M | 2.3M | 452K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HD and LOW and WSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FSV as "Buy", HD as "Buy", LOW as "Buy", WSO as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.5% upside for FSV (target: $203) vs -5.0% for WSO (target: $400). For income investors, WSO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.97% vs FSV's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $203.00 | $408.08 | $288.25 | $399.80 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 62 | 51 | 26 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +2.9% | +2.1% | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 16 | 16 | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.07 | $9.18 | $4.71 | $12.50 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.0% | +5.0% |
BLDR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LOW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FSV vs HD vs LOW vs WSO vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FirstService Corporation (FSV) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus FirstService Corporation at 39. 8x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Builders FirstSource, Inc. wins at 1. 67x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Watsco, Inc.
(WSO) delivered a total return of +58. 6%, compared to -20. 0% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +560. 4% versus HD's +181. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 160% more volatile than FSV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watsco, Inc. (WSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 148% for The Home Depot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FirstService Corporation (FSV) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FirstService Corporation grew EPS 6. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSV leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR?
The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 2. 6% for FirstService Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOW leads at 33. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 67x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 5. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 33. 4x for Watsco, Inc. — 20. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSV: 61. 5% to $203. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR?
In this comparison, WSO (3.
0% yield), HD (2. 9% yield), LOW (2. 1% yield), FSV (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FSV or HD or LOW or WSO or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 0. 8% yield, +196. 4% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSV: +196. 4%, BLDR: +560. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSV and HD and LOW and WSO and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSV (Real Estate) and HD (Consumer Cyclical) and LOW (Consumer Cyclical) and WSO (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
FSV, HD, LOW, WSO pay a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.