Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTFT vs FINV vs QFIN vs JFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Internet Content & Information
FTFT vs FINV vs QFIN vs JFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $6M | $2.90B | $3.75B | $534M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $13.07B | $17.17B | $6.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $2.80B | $6.89B | $1.71B |
| Gross Margin | 10.7% | 79.3% | 61.8% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | 19.4% | 43.9% | 32.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.6x | 0.5x | 0.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $34M | $1.65B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $4.67B | $4.45B | $541M |
FTFT vs FINV vs QFIN vs JFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 336.8 | +236.8% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) | 100 | 238.6 | +138.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTFT vs FINV vs QFIN vs JFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
- 77.5% revenue growth vs FINV's 3.7%
- -16.1% vs QFIN's -63.6%
FINV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
- Beta 1.12, yield 4.8%, current ratio 4.31x
- Beta 1.12 vs FTFT's 2.54, lower leverage
- 4.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JFIN's 16.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
QFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
- PEG 0.02 vs FINV's 0.19
- Lower P/E (0.5x vs 0.5x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.03
- 36.5% margin vs FTFT's -120.6%
JFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 16.9%
- 21.6% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC 39.9% vs -97.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.5% revenue growth vs FINV's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 0.5x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.03 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs FTFT's -120.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs FTFT's 2.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JFIN's 16.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.1% vs QFIN's -63.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.6% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC 39.9% vs -97.5% |
FTFT vs FINV vs QFIN vs JFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTFT vs FINV vs QFIN vs JFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTFT leads in 1 of 6 categories
QFIN leads 1 • JFIN leads 1 • FINV leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 4482.1x FTFT's $4M. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTFT's -120.6%. On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $13.1B | $17.2B | $6.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | $3.3B | $8.0B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $2.8B | $6.9B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $56.6B | $1.5B | $10.8B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +79.3% | +61.8% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | +19.4% | +43.9% | +32.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -120.6% | +18.2% | +36.5% | +26.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14767.2% | +21.9% | +53.5% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.9% | — | — | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -2.1% | -9.7% | +44.9% |
Valuation Metrics
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, JFIN trades at a 56% valuation discount to FINV's 3.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.11x vs FINV's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $2.9B | $3.8B | $534M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $2.2B | $3.3B | $462M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.54x | 3.85x | 2.15x | 1.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.65x | 0.47x | 0.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.13x | 0.11x | 0.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.76x | 2.99x | 2.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 1.51x | 1.49x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 0.59x | 0.56x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.89x | 2.78x | 5.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN delivers a 39.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-16 for FTFT. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QFIN's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QFIN scores 7/9 vs FINV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.4% | +17.4% | +28.8% | +39.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.9% | +11.2% | +12.2% | +21.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -97.5% | +12.9% | +23.1% | +39.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.5% | +13.8% | +35.6% | +32.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.00x | 0.07x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$457,223 | -$4.6B | -$2.8B | -$489M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $4.7B | $4.5B | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $34M | $1.7B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -228.78x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FTFT and FINV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JFIN five years ago would be worth $12,123 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $72 for FTFT. Over the past 12 months, FTFT leads with a -16.1% total return vs QFIN's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FINV at 13.2% vs FTFT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.7% | +3.6% | -22.5% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.1% | -35.3% | -63.6% | -54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.2% | +45.1% | +0.6% | +36.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -2.3% | -19.1% | +21.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -47.5% | +16.1% | -56.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.9% | +13.2% | +0.2% | +10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FINV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FINV is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FINV currently trades 47.0% from its 52-week high vs JFIN's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.54x | 1.12x | 1.20x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.03 | $10.90 | $47.00 | $19.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $4.50 | $12.30 | $3.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.0% | +47.0% | +28.1% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 58.4 | 53.7 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 108K | 1.3M | 1.4M | 63K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FINV and JFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FINV as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", JFIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 16.0% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, JFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 16.87% vs FINV's 4.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.94 | $28.15 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.8% | +9.3% | +16.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.67 | $8.32 | $5.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +11.6% | +1.5% |
FTFT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). QFIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FTFT vs FINV vs QFIN vs JFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FinVolution Group (FINV) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN?
On trailing P/E, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus FinVolution Group at 3. 9x. On forward P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) delivered a total return of +21. 2%, compared to -99. 3% for Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus FTFT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FinVolution Group (FINV) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning FTFT is approximately 127% more volatile than FINV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for Qfin Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus 3. 7% for FinVolution Group (FINV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -18. 0% for Jiayin Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JFIN leads at 48. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -120. 6% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FINV leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 0. 6x for FinVolution Group — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN?
In this comparison, JFIN (16.
9% yield), QFIN (9. 3% yield), FINV (4. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FTFT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTFT or FINV or QFIN or JFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 4. 8% yield). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FINV: -47. 5%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTFT and FINV and QFIN and JFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTFT (Technology) and FINV (Financial Services) and QFIN (Financial Services) and JFIN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; JFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. FINV, QFIN, JFIN pay a dividend while FTFT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 6.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.