Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FULC vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs BEAM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FULC
Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$372M
5Y Perf.-65.4%
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.92B
5Y Perf.+141.8%
SRPT
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-86.3%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-21.7%
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.23B
5Y Perf.+23.2%

FULC vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs BEAM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FULC logoFULC
ARWR logoARWR
SRPT logoSRPT
NTLA logoNTLA
BEAM logoBEAM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$372M$10.92B$2.18B$1.62B$3.23B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$622M$2.18B$68M$132M
Net Income (TTM)$-76M$-301M$65M$-413M$-65M
Gross Margin85.1%34.4%-25.6%-64.2%
Operating Margin-35.7%-1.9%-6.5%-281.0%
Forward P/E6.9x
Total Debt$6M$366M$1.04B$93M$294M
Cash & Equiv.$198M$227M$801M$155M$295M

FULC vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs BEAMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FULC
ARWR
SRPT
NTLA
BEAM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Fulcrum Therapeutic… (FULC)10034.6-65.4%
Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR)100241.8+141.8%
Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT)10013.7-86.3%
Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA)10078.3-21.7%
Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM)100123.2+23.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FULC vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs BEAM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARWR and SRPT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FULC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FULC
Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FULC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.40
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 27.40x
  • Beta 1.40, current ratio 27.40x
  • Beta 1.40 vs NTLA's 2.37, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
  • 12.5% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 67.8%
  • 232.6% revenue growth vs FULC's -100.0%
  • +496.9% vs SRPT's -43.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SRPT
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

SRPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 3.0% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
  • 1.9% ROA vs NTLA's -45.2%, ROIC -31.4% vs -44.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

NTLA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, BEAM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARWR logoARWR232.6% revenue growth vs FULC's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsSRPT logoSRPT3.0% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyFULC logoFULCBeta 1.40 vs NTLA's 2.37, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARWR logoARWR+496.9% vs SRPT's -43.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SRPT logoSRPT1.9% ROA vs NTLA's -45.2%, ROIC -31.4% vs -44.0%

FULC vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs BEAM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARWRLAGGINGBEAM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SRPT and FULC operate at a comparable scale, with $2.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. SRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.1%. On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFULC logoFULCFulcrum Therapeut…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$622M$2.2B$68M$132M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$86M-$203M-$6M-$431M-$355M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$76M-$301M$65M-$413M-$65M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$64M-$51M$107M-$396M-$384M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+85.1%+34.4%-25.6%-64.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-35.7%-1.9%-6.5%-2.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-48.4%+3.0%-6.1%-49.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.2%+4.9%-5.8%-2.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-86.4%-1.9%+78.8%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.7%-133.8%+162.6%+34.6%+26.6%
SRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FULC and ARWR and SRPT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricFULC logoFULCFulcrum Therapeut…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$372M$10.9B$2.2B$1.6B$3.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$181M$11.1B$2.4B$1.6B$3.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.83x-6389.34x-2.92x-3.60x-38.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple90.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue13.16x0.99x23.93x23.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.25x20.71x1.91x2.21x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF69.58x
Evenly matched — FULC and ARWR and SRPT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — FULC and ARWR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

SRPT delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-57 for NTLA. FULC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SRPT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs FULC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFULC logoFULCFulcrum Therapeut…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-27.8%-55.5%+4.9%-56.6%-5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-26.3%-18.1%+1.9%-45.2%-4.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.2%+9.3%-31.4%-44.0%-31.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-28.1%+8.8%-24.0%-48.5%-33.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936444
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.73x0.91x0.14x0.24x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$191M$140M$238M-$62M-$1M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$198M$227M$801M$155M$295M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$366M$1.0B$93M$294M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.03x-14.00x1.08x
Evenly matched — FULC and ARWR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $11,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,024 for NTLA. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs SRPT's -43.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULC at 30.7% vs SRPT's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFULC logoFULCFulcrum Therapeut…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.0%+15.0%-2.4%+48.9%+16.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.7%+496.9%-43.4%+88.1%+93.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.4%+92.7%-83.6%-68.3%-5.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.4%+17.4%-72.1%-79.8%-55.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.0%+1253.3%+18.0%-42.9%+67.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+24.4%-45.3%-31.8%-1.9%
ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FULC and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FULC is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs FULC's 43.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFULC logoFULCFulcrum Therapeut…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x1.81x2.02x2.37x2.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.74$79.48$44.14$28.25$36.44
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.78$12.44$10.42$6.83$15.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+43.7%+98.1%+47.1%+48.5%+86.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.069.763.450.460.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded990K1.9M3.0M5.3M2.0M
Evenly matched — FULC and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FULC as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 200.4% upside for FULC (target: $21) vs 4.2% for ARWR (target: $81).

MetricFULC logoFULCFulcrum Therapeut…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.67$81.22$24.63$20.88$40.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts1620543927
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.1%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ARWR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, … (ARWR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FULC vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC). Analysts rate Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM?

Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) delivered a total return of +17. 4%, compared to -79. 8% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus FULC's -49. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.

(FULC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 69% more volatile than FULC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 91% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus -100. 0% for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -637. 5% for Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM?

Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.

(FULC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 97. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULC: 200.

4% to $20. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is FULC or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1253% 10Y return). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1253%, NTLA: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FULC and ARWR and SRPT and NTLA and BEAM?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FULC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FULC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 51%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SRPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTLA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BEAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FULC and ARWR and SRPT and NTLA and BEAM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FULC: -100.0% · ARWR: -86.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.